I think he's actually right about that though. Undertaker faced Kane for the belt with Austin as the special guest ref in 98. The bout ended in a draw/ and led to the tourney at Survivor Series.
Still it's a b ppv. We're talking real $ matches here.
So from 1997 to 2019, they only main-evented a PPV twice....from a creative standpoint they been stuck together since Kane's debut, and yet only 2 main-events. It's funny that you mentioned the breakdown match, they had add Austin into the mix just to generate interest, and the fact that the fans popped with AUstin both of them down and counted to three, which is one of the worst finishes I've ever seen, just prove that people didn't really give a crap about those two facing each other, they just wanted to see Austin.
No it's not. The argument is whether the matches themselves were big money matches. You seem to be under the impression that unless the match was in the main event, it wasn't a draw, which is laughable.
It's not about who close out the show. The main storyline leading up to that PPV was Kane/Austin, it's not even debatable.
The night after, those two main-evented the Show again.
Where did I ever state that Kane/Taker was the true main event of WM 14? I'll wait.
You said for a lot of people Kane/Taker was the biggest match of the show,...not even the biggest Kane/Taker fans believe this.
Your exact reply to Taker/Mankind was "it might have stole the show, but it wasn't the main event". What do you think main event means?
Main event = the main storyline
Rock/Hogan was the true main-event of WM 18 because leading up to that event it was a primary focus from a creative standpoint.
The Rock benefited from Austin's rise in popularity and had a strong supporting cast to help him. And even then, his popularity outside the US doesn't come anywhere close to Andres.
Here we go again.
The same can be said about Austin, he benefited from the nWo's rise in popularity. They literally brought the wrestling industry from death to life. Actually, if it wasn't for Hulk Hogan turning the WWE into a global brand in the 80s, Austin wouldn't be nearly as popular.
If getting big in the AE was this easy, then why didn't the other wrestlers rode the "Austin wave", and become as popular as Rock was/is?
Now you're saying Andre was bigger than Rock...lol. No one sold out more house shows than Rock did in 2000. Seriously, just stop.