Wrestling Forum banner
41 - 52 of 52 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
50 Posts
As it stands in relation to the build it doesn't even deserve to be in the Wrestlemania card. This shit has no heat. Same as Asuka/Bianca.
IMO it really should've been Rhea vs Bianca. I always want to see the best 2 face each other, not spread out over 2 matches. Bianca has been a powerhouse and unbeaten in quite a while, and Rhea IS a powerhouse with all the momentum in the world. That would be a classic, and that's a WM worthy match.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,699 Posts
IMO it really should've been Rhea vs Bianca. I always want to see the best 2 face each other, not spread out over 2 matches. Bianca has been a powerhouse and unbeaten in quite a while, and Rhea IS a powerhouse with all the momentum in the world. That would be a classic, and that's a WM worthy match.
I think the original plan prior to backstage politics several months ago was

SD women’s chamophonship match: Ronda vs Becky

Raw women’s championship match: Bianca vs Rhea

These two would have been killer matches, full of star power that would have made sense.

And look what we are getting instead, such a joke.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
6,228 Posts
I think two bloodline main events is overkill. Tag title match can kick off the show. Crowd will be hot and will force everyone else to step up their game.

In terms of deserve, I don't know, but Rhea Ripley is getting a hell of alot of screen time on both RAW and Smackdown. It's a star making moment for her at WM so I think it would be better going on last than the tag title match which really has no business going on last.

Not that anyone of this really matters. Did Austin vs Bret go on last? No. Did HBK vs Taker at WM 25 go on last? No. Sometimes people including the talent take the whole main event thing a little to far. You can have a legendary moment where ever you are on the card.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
10,238 Posts
I think that's poor reasoning especially since that hasn't always been the case.
I meant in my opinion the Rumble winner should get to main event, I know that WWE hasn't done that in every year

Undertaker vs batista at WM 22 was like the 3rd match
Mysterio was the Rumble winner at 22 and I think he should have main-evented too but thats just an opinion
 

· Registered
Joined
·
5 Posts
The match has no build there. If they gonna keep 2 nite mania...then in true HHH fashion...1st night should build in suspense to 2nd night....meaning ...

Some twists that yield unexpected wins or losses and capped off by solid performers with a push in Main event on 1st night (ie. Cena/theory)....but however things go down in other setups on night 1
should bring their participation carryover to night 2 to possibly affect some outcomes.....
THAT ...is how you sustain interest in what is and has become a painful 2 night affair now...otherwise..why go to one or the other...gotta have interest and build in 1 and then follow through and surprise in night 2
 

· Registered
Joined
·
21,393 Posts
I’d put Cena v Theory and Usos vs KO-Zayn above this match as a night 1 main event.
 

· FOTC
Joined
·
13,072 Posts
There are FOUR tag team matches scheduled for WM 39. The Usos vs. Kevin Owens and Sami Zayn will be the main event of Night 1. That's the only tag match we should see on Night 1. Put the other three tag matches on Night 2.
 
41 - 52 of 52 Posts
Top