Do you think that Vince McMahon ended the streak so that presuming Lesnar puts Reigns over at Mania, he gets all the credibility and none of the heat of ending the streak?
What a stupid comment. The match with Lesnar was awful BECAUSE he was concussed, not the other way around. Anyone that thinks Undertaker came into Wrestlemania for the last 8 years and had arguably the best match on the card each time with different opponents simply because he was carried by these guys is an idiot and it shits all over Undertaker's skill as a performer, his dedication to putting on an incredible show at 'Mania and the story he and his opponents told in the ring together.No, I think it had more to do with Undertaker's body exeeding its mileage, and his opponents having to carry him the past few years. His match with Lesnar was awful, and he ended up concussed, so I think Vince did the right thing.
Reigns beating Lesnar at Mania is just the payoff.
I'm not saying this is or isn't true... it could be for all we know. But for the record, Calaway NEVER went on record and said that. Something posted on dirtsheets or insinuated through wrestle reporters or even other wrestlers isn't the same thing as going on record and stating it from your own mouth.Why don't people understand that MARK CALAWAY wanted the streak to end, specifically to Brock. He has gone on record saying he has wanted the streak to end a few times so this was 100% his decision, not Vince's. Common sense, man.