Wrestling Forum banner

181 - 190 of 190 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
466 Posts
If a woman wrestler wants to do it then so be it. Who are we to decide what a woman can and can't do to get over or make money? If Vince forces them to do it, then we have another story.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,681 Posts
IF your objective is for WWE to run into severe political headwinds, then you encourage this. If WWE were to run this in 2020 they would be absolutely slammed, and probably lose their FOX deal.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,577 Posts
Threads like this may be kinda depressing, as they show how backwards some people's opinions still are ... but at least it outs them as misogynistic idiots who'll take literally any opportunity they can to try and push the treatment of women back a couple of decades.

As much as you dress it up with nonsense, and retaliate to people disagreeing with buzzword insults that mean nothing, you're still showing your antiquated position on the subject, and making it clear that people with those opinions aren't worth taking take seriously elsewhere on the forums. :D

I see they're already back-pedalling on the matter anyway, deciding that these matches should only be for the women that they find attractive, and the women that have the right shape. Do you even read what you type before you hit "submit"?

:eyeroll
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
847 Posts
Threads like this may be kinda depressing, as they show how backwards some people's opinions still are ... but at least it outs them as misogynistic idiots who'll take literally any opportunity they can to try and push the treatment of women back a couple of decades.

As much as you dress it up with nonsense, and retaliate to people disagreeing with buzzword insults that mean nothing, you're still showing your antiquated position on the subject, and making it clear that people with those opinions aren't worth taking take seriously elsewhere on the forums. <img src="http://www.wrestlingforum.com/images/smilies/biggrin.gif" border="0" alt="" title="Big Grin" class="inlineimg" />

I see they're already back-pedalling on the matter anyway, deciding that these matches should only be for the women that they find attractive, and the women that have the right shape. Do you even read what you type before you hit "submit"?

<img src="http://i.imgur.com/DWZhB88.gif" border="0" alt="" title="Eye Roll" class="inlineimg" />
There's no backtracking going on. When WWE was doing bra and panties they hired models as their wrestlers not wrestlers. That's a fact. The notion that Stacy Keibler was hired to do anything but strip and sell sex is common sense. The idea that she was hired to wrestle Now that's laughable. Now you can state that's offensive towards women. That's fine I'm not calling you out there but it's the absolute truth that if WWE were to go back to those matches they'd hire accordingly. They're not going to sell sex with Natalia vs Tamina in a bra and panties match. They're wrestlers not models.

Seems to me like you're just struggling to connect a few dots. You hire models to take off their clothes and wrestlers to wrestle. WWE understood that and that's why the talent has changed over the years.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
768 Posts
First, lets be real: it a'int going to happen because when those types of matches were the norm, they were still a private company. When they went public, yeah, there were a few, but they were tamed down. Also, the talent doing so had no talend...Trish and Lita LATER became good in the ring, but by the time they did, the product was toned down.

Second, it would accomplish virtually nothing of they did such a match again. Wrestling is not what it was back then. The ladies can actually wrestle now! Also, the WWE is in between a "rock and a hard place" with their core fanbase. It made up of the "old faithfuls" that have been watching since the year 1 and little kids who they make the vast majority of their merchandise money appealing to with their parents buying shirts, toys, action figures, etc. WWE overall is not cool to most of the 16-45 year old market. Having a couple of the girls in their underwear for all of a minute and a half (if that) isn't going to bring much to the table as you do not have a Stone Cold Steve Austin or a Rock to keep you interested and glued to your TV screen.

Third, if you are thirsty for seeing many of your favorite girls in their underwear or bikinis, all you have to do is visit their Social Media pages and the Internet and you will more than likely find what you are looking for. UNFORTUNATELY, you may find more than that as some things are not a secret, but I will not glorify the invasion of their privacy.
 
181 - 190 of 190 Posts
Top