Wrestling Forum banner
21 - 40 of 42 Posts

· Premium Member
Joined
·
6,159 Posts
It was a very good concept at first, and when done correctly, has created some great moments.

Edge's first title win, the two times CM Punk cashed in and Seth Rollins WrestleMania win in particular stand out as great moments.

The last couple of years have just been very bleugh. Hopefully Triple H can restore its prestige again. Have somebody believable win once Roman's reign has finished.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,206 Posts
It was a very good concept at first, and when done correctly, has created some great moments.

Edge's first title win, the two times CM Punk cashed in and Seth Rollins WrestleMania win in particular stand out as great moments.

The last couple of years have just been very bleugh. Hopefully Triple H can restore its prestige again. Have somebody believable win once Roman's reign has finished.
This, this one’s in London so hopefully we get a good winner at least.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
50 Posts
I would get rid of it altogether. Nobody takes the new champion seriously until they've defended it against the former champion, it only creates paper champions and devalues the title.

The matches are cool, so maybe keep it but have it so the title shot is fixed for SummerSlam.
Wow, I really like this idea...they should make it back as a WM match and have the winner with a guaranteed title match at the next PPV, or have the PPV closer to summerslam and have the winner main event. It's something to think about for sure, cause yeah it's been getting pretty stale. And no one takes the new title holder seriously until their first defense
 

· Registered
Joined
·
6,595 Posts
It was a very good concept at first, and when done correctly, has created some great moments.

Edge's first title win, the two times CM Punk cashed in and Seth Rollins WrestleMania win in particular stand out as great moments.

The last couple of years have just been very bleugh. Hopefully Triple H can restore its prestige again. Have somebody believable win once Roman's reign has finished.
Imagine if Cody loses at Mania, wins MitB, the Usos finally turn on Roman, and then Roman's reign ends with a MitB cash in
 

· Registered
Joined
·
7,187 Posts
I don't like how they made it it's own PPV. Money in the bank ladder match was something to look forward to at WrestleMania and there was only one briefcase. Also having people consecutively lose the cash in has completely devalued it.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
2,712 Posts
I think it’s fine. It’s a good concept, and when booked properly, it can help elevate a midcarder/young guy that hasn’t been there. Which is different from the Rumble, because that’s pretty much always an already established guy.

The issue has been the winners and the booking of it really since Rollins. Corbin, Otis, The Miz? Really…Braun didn’t even win with his. Brock didn’t need it to get a rematch with Rollins. We all know how poorly Theory’s went.
 
21 - 40 of 42 Posts
Top