Clearly there setting up for Orton vs Punk at Mania.The title match was alright but...why Punk?
Thank god for that eh? Or he would have dropped out of it in 1.9 sec...michael tarver was not in the rumble![]()
I realise they were probably setting that up, but why not follow up in the rumble match? It just made it look like stupid random intereference with no point other than to keep the title on Miz. Both were in the rumble, so they should have continued it. There were just so many ridiculous booking decisions and thigns that didn't make sense it irritated me.Clearly there setting up for Orton vs Punk at Mania.
I didn't have a problem with Del Rio winning the match, it's just it turned out to be such a fiasco in my eyes (the rumble match) that his win completely fell flat with me. I like the guy, so don't mind him winning. I was just annoyed Morrison didn't last longer since he should have, and with the stuff he can do, there was so much more they could have had him pull off in that match. Morrison is a good bet for MITB, but so is Dolph Ziggler and since they like having heels win it, my money would still be on Ziggler unfortunately.You should be ecstatic that Del Rio won the Rumble. Morrison is completely unopposed to win the MITB now, whereas he had no shot at all before.
They've actually had 4 faces win the MITB, so it's not uncommon ground. RVD, Punk twice and Kane. Granted, 2 of those resulted in heel turns, but that could happen to Morrison as well. As much as I hate Morrison, I can't justify giving Ziggler the win over him. He can't be trusted with the belt. He's SO bad that it goes beyond belief, he's actually eclipsed Morrison in terms of being terrible. He has the presence of a 4 year old girl. He's the most forgettable wrestler on the roster. Not only that, but Morrison's actually getting a real push. Ziggler was just filler. I wondered why it wasn't Del Rio that got the title match at the Rumble instead, since he's a FAR bigger star than Ziggler, and now I know (I know Ziggler entered the Rumble anyway after having the title match, but they had to build Del Rio to win the Rumble). Either way, Morrison is a safer bet.I didn't have a problem with Del Rio winning the match, it's just it turned out to be such a fiasco in my eyes (the rumble match) that his win completely fell flat with me. I like the guy, so don't mind him winning. I was just annoyed Morrison didn't last longer since he should have, and with the stuff he can do, there was so much more they could have had him pull off in that match. Morrison is a good bet for MITB, but so is Dolph Ziggler and since they like having heels win it, my money would still be on Ziggler unfortunately.
If Morrison wins MITB and turns heel...it would be pretty good, and that could happen yeh. I have a feeling they want him to stay face though. I guess it's about time a face won and cashed in the RVD way, it's been a while since someone has. I hope your right and that he does end up winning it, he's been getting the push to somewhere like that so I can only hope they don't drop it for no reason.They've actually had 4 faces win the MITB, so it's not uncommon ground. RVD, Punk twice and Kane. Granted, 2 of those resulted in heel turns, but that could happen to Morrison as well. As much as I hate Morrison, I can't justify giving Ziggler the win over him. He can't be trusted with the belt. He's SO bad that it goes beyond belief, he's actually eclipsed Morrison in terms of being terrible. He has the presence of a 4 year old girl. He's the most forgettable wrestler on the roster. Not only that, but Morrison's actually getting a real push. Ziggler was just filler. I wondered why it wasn't Del Rio that got the title match at the Rumble instead, since he's a FAR bigger star than Ziggler, and now I know (I know Ziggler entered the Rumble anyway after having the title match, but they had to build Del Rio to win the Rumble). Either way, Morrison is a safer bet.
I'd give it to Kofi Kingston before either of them, but, you know.....black.