Re: Can we just agree that Roman Reigns is the best contender for being the next FOTC?
Drew can't/won't be FOTC. Reason is not accent (this could actually be fixed easily if this was his problem, I know some people who got rid of accent pretty quick). He is way too big, hard to be FOTC where you have to play underdog when you are 6'5, 250+ pound monster. If anything he should be booked like Taker, important, feared, respected. He has build, height, badass look, entrance, attitude all he needs is better looking. He is still very young too. Guy clearly has good work ethic, and has proved himself since he left WWE and came back. Not many guys his size can't move that fast and do things he does.
Now Roman, I am not ashamed to admit I didn't give a fuck about Shield at all, especially in first few years. I however did like Roman for first few years of his career on main roster. Dude has strength, size, look, and charisma (when he is allowed to be himself) and I always thought he is way more entertaining than Ambrose or Rollins. Now if we are gonna be honest Rollins is best in ring, but there is just something off about guy, I could never get invested in him. Ambrose was worst and still is IMO. Guy was cringe in ring (people bitch about Roman in ring but did you ever fucking watch Ambrose?) and always over reacted on mic, he would always look like he trying too hard. Then WWE ruined Roman with retarded push and booking over the years and I started getting bored of him. He did have potential but they ruined him.
there was a chance to fix him and turn him heel, have him end the streak and become most hated man in professional wrestling history. I honestly believe guy had potential to be best heel ever if they weren't pussies and went for his Face push. There is still hope, streak is gone but there are other ways to get him some major heat.