Wrestling Forum banner
21 - 40 of 67 Posts
WWE would rather eliminate the combative aspect of professional wrestling from professional wrestling than die. That is why they can so easily call themselves "storytellers" or "sports entertainment", than professional wrestling
This is kinda working right now. A lot of people put more stock in promo battles/mic work than believable in-ring offense. We're slowly getting to the point where the ultimate pay off in a feud, the match, is less exciting than everything around it.
 
I can guarantee you that we wouldn't be on this forum right now, nor anywhere else talking about wrestling.
I certainly believe the alternate timeline may not reached out to 2025 either WWF being worth billions of dollars.

Does Hulkamania even happen without Vince? I think Vince had as much to do, if not more than Hogan in Hulkamania becoming so big and Hogan becoming the big megastar he is.
He did have a huge part to play and that is why I mentioned Hulkamania.

Pro wrestling started to gain steam really in 1983. Hogan was known via Rocky 3. However, some top wrestlers didn’t like Hogan because he was seen more as a showman.

Backlund didn’t want to turn heel to put him over. Verne Gagne didn’t want Bockwinkle to put him over as champ either.

That is why I made the comment on whether Flair would agree to make him the man.

Hogan besides Sgt. Slaughter had the hero appeal for masses at that level.
 
Pro wrestling is a microcosm of society. The attitude era wasn't just limited to pro wrestling. Society was in an attitude era from 1991 to about 2000.

In order for pro wrestling to survive it must adequately adapt itself to the society in which it lives. As long as WWE recognizes the societal trends and adapts to it, it will survive. WWE has transitioned their flagship program, RAW, from TV to streaming. WWE is much too corporate, commercialistic and greedy not to try and adapt to society

WWE would rather eliminate the combative aspect of professional wrestling from professional wrestling than die. That is why they can so easily call themselves "storytellers" or "sports entertainment", than professional wrestling
Oh, I understand that completely. WWE is great at what they do. And they have a ton of resources to work with. It's not like I'm predicting WWE to be closed by 2030. But I wouldn't be surprised if it dies at some point. I just started getting really into it again when Wyatt Sicks was going to debut. I always liked Bray, and it got me into it enough that I started to pay attention to wrestling again. And it's not terrible. But I do feel like it is pretty much the same thing every night. The formatting of their TV program is a problem. They do entrances. Throw someone to the outside, do a dive. Go to commercial. The amount of brawls taking place with security pulling them apart. I just feel like I'm watching the same thing week after week. If we're in the Attitude Era. Steve Austin might show up with a beer truck, they might throw someone into the river, they might blow up a limo. I mean, the product found new ways to entertain you. I don't know if they have that drive or creativity to keep it fun. And at the end of the day, it's fake fighting. It has to have something. Do you think people would watch boxing if it was scripted?
 
Discussion starter · #25 ·
Oh, I understand that completely. WWE is great at what they do. And they have a ton of resources to work with. It's not like I'm predicting WWE to be closed by 2030. But I wouldn't be surprised if it dies at some point. I just started getting really into it again when Wyatt Sicks was going to debut. I always liked Bray, and it got me into it enough that I started to pay attention to wrestling again. And it's not terrible. But I do feel like it is pretty much the same thing every night. The formatting of their TV program is a problem. They do entrances. Throw someone to the outside, do a dive. Go to commercial. The amount of brawls taking place with security pulling them apart. I just feel like I'm watching the same thing week after week. If we're in the Attitude Era. Steve Austin might show up with a beer truck, they might throw someone into the river, they might blow up a limo. I mean, the product found new ways to entertain you. I don't know if they have that drive or creativity to keep it fun. And at the end of the day, it's fake fighting. It has to have something. Do you think people would watch boxing if it was scripted?
Don't be mistaken. Professional wrestling, itself, is dead. WWE hasn't had any use for actual "professional wrestling" since, at least, 1999 when they decided to go public. In my opinion, true professional wrestling died when kayfabe died. The advent of the internet and the Montreal Screwjob were just the the final nails in the coffin

Once the attitude era got hot everyone knew the business was a work so all WWE had left to do was be as risque and rebellious as possible and people were willing to eat it up. It was the final gasps of true masculinity in pro wrestling. Since that point, everything has been become commercialized and formulaic. WWE now caters to sponsors, answers to shareholders and is afraid to offend the "wrong" people

So yeah, you're right in that real professional is dead but it has been for decades. There is still an appetite for real pro wrestling but, unfortunately, those who actually have it are more in the minority
 
It’d be dead because the pro wrestling traditionalists would’ve dominated over the showmanships. You have to understand that the 60s and 70s had wrestlers who thought they’d get their big break from the Gorgeous George era, when they didn’t they became bitter. They created a toxic environment and tried to keep young talent down. Hogan, Flair, Piper they all have their own stories when they started.

Wrestling would linger around, but it wouldn’t become mainstream purely because of the lack of celebrity involvement. Eventually you’d have Hogan, Flair, Savage, Piper, Road Warriors all under the same umbrella promotion, but their reach wouldn’t be as far. They wouldn’t have the same pop culture impact. The 90s would’ve tried to emulate 70s wrestling. WCW during the late 80s and 90s was creatively bankrupt, that product was the best they were able to do.

A big thing forgotten about Hulkamania is how it introduced merchandise in a big way. Hogan was on everything. AWA would’ve sold Hulkamania t-shirts, but WWF changed the game with cartoons, ice creams, lunchboxes, action figures etc. Vince and Hogan literally saved wrestling.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jpickens
Oh, I understand that completely. WWE is great at what they do. And they have a ton of resources to work with. It's not like I'm predicting WWE to be closed by 2030. But I wouldn't be surprised if it dies at some point. I just started getting really into it again when Wyatt Sicks was going to debut. I always liked Bray, and it got me into it enough that I started to pay attention to wrestling again. And it's not terrible. But I do feel like it is pretty much the same thing every night. The formatting of their TV program is a problem. They do entrances. Throw someone to the outside, do a dive. Go to commercial. The amount of brawls taking place with security pulling them apart. I just feel like I'm watching the same thing week after week. If we're in the Attitude Era. Steve Austin might show up with a beer truck, they might throw someone into the river, they might blow up a limo. I mean, the product found new ways to entertain you. I don't know if they have that drive or creativity to keep it fun. And at the end of the day, it's fake fighting. It has to have something. Do you think people would watch boxing if it was scripted?
Since doing some historical posts I thought about this comment about the programming evolution and also changing viewing habits over the years.

I remember an interview with Bruno Sammartino talking about how Vince Jr. ran lesser times MSG compared to his dad with Hogan as champ. He said it was due to Hogan's formula and it would wear thin if he was there monthly and they needed to go to different markets.

It got me thinking that the old model although not the most entertaining or lack of unpredictable content, there was a reason for it. It was to drive people to live shows and this way it lessens the overexposure of acts on television in big matches.

This caused big gates and ticket sales across the board in 1986 breaking records with Hogan. The superstar vs superstar and majority of major title matches on television was basically quarterly with SNME. It still left room for weekly syndicated shows to advance stories, while at the same time it would showcase superstars against local jobbers or just jobbers to make fans familiar with their moveset and finishers.

This way at the house shows fans would see the stars and the matches at the least monthly and lower the overexposure. This worked very well from 1986-1989, but by spring 1990 attendance started to drop in comparison. You wouldn't see title changes at house shows as previously with Savage vs Santana at Boston Garden for example.

Then Vince tried to innovate with Monday Night RAW using it sort of like a live version of the weekend shows, but you could see star vs star on a more regular occurrence with title changes such as Marty Jannetty and HBK with the IC title. That worked and felt different as they wanted to come off raw to the audience again instead of a polished Marvel show with characters.

It eventually also had taped weeks to save money as after the steroid and sex scandal along with the departure of stars to WCW things were still declining into 1995. WCW came around with Nitro and changed the game as we know and it made WWF force to change more to that type of programming. Then we were getting can you top this every week where they burned through YEARS of angles.

Instead of just having the Big 4 PPV shows, we now had a ppv each month to counter WCW. This too also caused burnout, but here we are today with current WWE trying to do RAW and Smackdown in the streaming era with less constraints for RAW with timing and censoring.


Don't be mistaken. Professional wrestling, itself, is dead. WWE hasn't had any use for actual "professional wrestling" since, at least, 1999 when they decided to go public. In my opinion, true professional wrestling died when kayfabe died. The advent of the internet and the Montreal Screwjob were just the the final nails in the coffin

Once the attitude era got hot everyone knew the business was a work so all WWE had left to do was be as risque and rebellious as possible and people were willing to eat it up. It was the final gasps of true masculinity in pro wrestling. Since that point, everything has been become commercialized and formulaic. WWE now caters to sponsors, answers to shareholders and is afraid to offend the "wrong" people

So yeah, you're right in that real professional is dead but it has been for decades. There is still an appetite for real pro wrestling but, unfortunately, those who actually have it are more in the minority
One thing with the Attitude Era is they created a new kayfabe somewhat with shworks as I mentioned in the MT Rushmore Cody promo thread. The beef with Bret and HBK brought a new type of reality that grabbed viewers attention because of the reality of it. The other element was Vince coming out as the real boss who tries to manipulate wrestlers to be in the form he wanted them to be for PR reasons.

This worked really well due to Hogan smashing his old image in WCW turning heel too. The other thing that made the Attitude Era grab attention with new and old viewers was the reality of the real competition going on with WCW and WWF. The fans also knew that was real. I think the risque stuff like in 1999 wasn't really what brought fans back heavy, but the shedding of the old gimmicks and becoming more reality tv based with relatable stars like Austin who appeared to be like the average worker in the crowd trying to do his work against the system.

The very same thing that WWE was accusing WCW of in terms of hiring old wrestlers and being predatory with practices WWE has become.
 
This is kinda working right now. A lot of people put more stock in promo battles/mic work than believable in-ring offense. We're slowly getting to the point where the ultimate pay off in a feud, the match, is less exciting than everything around it.
I missed this post earlier, but what you are saying is on point. It goes into my point above about the shworks that were brought in during the 90s with mic work blurring the lines with the backstage/politics of situations or stars. I guess things like Cena vs Roman even in recent years mic exchange fans knew there were "legitimate" things with what was thrown back and forth between them. It's a sign fans want to believe and immerse with content that they could totally buy into.

The matches are a different story being a work. However, this is for hardcore fans who get the art of the whole thing compared to a casual who wouldn't notice the nuances between shoot and work.
 
Discussion starter · #30 ·
Since doing some historical posts I thought about this comment about the programming evolution and also changing viewing habits over the years.

I remember an interview with Bruno Sammartino talking about how Vince Jr. ran lesser times MSG compared to his dad with Hogan as champ. He said it was due to Hogan's formula and it would wear thin if he was there monthly and they needed to go to different markets.

It got me thinking that the old model although not the most entertaining or lack of unpredictable content, there was a reason for it. It was to drive people to live shows and this way it lessens the overexposure of acts on television in big matches.

This caused big gates and ticket sales across the board in 1986 breaking records with Hogan. The superstar vs superstar and majority of major title matches on television was basically quarterly with SNME. It still left room for weekly syndicated shows to advance stories, while at the same time it would showcase superstars against local jobbers or just jobbers to make fans familiar with their moveset and finishers.

This way at the house shows fans would see the stars and the matches at the least monthly and lower the overexposure. This worked very well from 1986-1989, but by spring 1990 attendance started to drop in comparison. You wouldn't see title changes at house shows as previously with Savage vs Santana at Boston Garden for example.

Then Vince tried to innovate with Monday Night RAW using it sort of like a live version of the weekend shows, but you could see star vs star on a more regular occurrence with title changes such as Marty Jannetty and HBK with the IC title. That worked and felt different as they wanted to come off raw to the audience again instead of a polished Marvel show with characters.

It eventually also had taped weeks to save money as after the steroid and sex scandal along with the departure of stars to WCW things were still declining into 1995. WCW came around with Nitro and changed the game as we know and it made WWF force to change more to that type of programming. Then we were getting can you top this every week where they burned through YEARS of angles.

Instead of just having the Big 4 PPV shows, we now had a ppv each month to counter WCW. This too also caused burnout, but here we are today with current WWE trying to do RAW and Smackdown in the streaming era with less constraints for RAW with timing and censoring.




One thing with the Attitude Era is they created a new kayfabe somewhat with shworks as I mentioned in the MT Rushmore Cody promo thread. The beef with Bret and HBK brought a new type of reality that grabbed viewers attention because of the reality of it. The other element was Vince coming out as the real boss who tries to manipulate wrestlers to be in the form he wanted them to be for PR reasons.

This worked really well due to Hogan smashing his old image in WCW turning heel too. The other thing that made the Attitude Era grab attention with new and old viewers was the reality of the real competition going on with WCW and WWF. The fans also knew that was real. I think the risque stuff like in 1999 wasn't really what brought fans back heavy, but the shedding of the old gimmicks and becoming more reality tv based with relatable stars like Austin who appeared to be like the average worker in the crowd trying to do his work against the system.

The very same thing that WWE was accusing WCW of in terms of hiring old wrestlers and being predatory with practices WWE has become.
The ramifications of the Montreal Screwjobs were that the relationships between the employees and the employer did get more blurred. That dynamic did make things pretty intriguing in the short term but really harmed the business in the long term

A case in point was that once Eric Bischoff signed with WWE in 2002 or so, it's not as if people would come in droves to see what type of heat he and Vince might generate. Again, the attitude era was hot, created a facsimile of kayfabe but then crashed in 2001.

WWEs model for success the past 10-15 years is unlike anything quite seen in professional wrestling before it. They now rely on TV contracts, streaming deals, social media promotion, merchandise/content creation, political maneuverability, more international touring and diversity initiatives
 
The ramifications of the Montreal Screwjobs were that the relationships between the employees and the employer did get more blurred. That dynamic did make things pretty intriguing in the short term but really harmed the business in the long term

A case in point was that once Eric Bischoff signed with WWE in 2002 or so, it's not as if people would come in droves to see what type of heat he and Vince might generate. Again, the attitude era was hot, created a facsimile of kayfabe but then crashed in 2001.

WWEs model for success the past 10-15 years is unlike anything quite seen in professional wrestling before it. They now rely on TV contracts, streaming deals, social media promotion, merchandise/content creation, political maneuverability, more international touring and diversity initiatives
Yeah as I said here we are in 2025 with this timeline. I agree with you.

I could even break this down even more since this topic is what would wrestling be like without Vince. I do find it interesting the different types of fans and the changing viewing habits since 1984. There is so much domino effect that has occurred and in due time has Hulk Hogan and Vince Mcmahon's real life current heat with fans by proxy karma for what they did to the wrestling business or getting back their own dose of medicine they did to the original pro wrestling fans?

What do I mean by this? Just look at how everything has turned out. Now this would be a dramatic biopic.

Vince Mcmahon Jr. did a buyout of his father's company. He claims if his father knew what he was going to do the business he would have never sold it to him. On the flip side to that, the opposite is said by some saying his father DID know what he was about to do with the national expansion and it would be better if he broke the old handshake agreements with the fiefdoms.

Regardless whichever side one falls on which story to believe, the result is the same. The raid of the AWA begins and Vince is off to the races with ironically the star his father fired because he wanted him to choose being a pro wrestler instead of a movie star. Now remember that karma thing I said? Who know is on the board of TKO that runs WWE? None other than the movie star The Rock who was passed the torch by that very same Hulk Hogan basically 20 years after the fact Vince Mcmahon fired Hulk Hogan for being a movie star. Hogan was fired in April/May of 1981 and he returned to WWF in 2002 after being let go basically a decade earlier that made it a decade after being fired by Vince Sr.

Now what did I say above? None of the top champs liked Hulk Hogan because they kind of had the same mentality of Vince Mcmahon Sr about him being a movie star. Bruno Sammartino never really gave Hogan the co-sign. This keep in mind as in future years Hogan would be accused of politics and holding talent down, but it is rarely talked about how the champs of Hogan's day never passed the torch to him either. Here is Vince Mcmahon Sr. with Bruno Sammartino. The guy they are still chasing the ghost of recently with Roman Reigns title run in terms of record length. Another irony is that Roman was Vince's last chosen champion and Vince probably tried to chase that ghost to with his father's champion the record of his then company.




During this time Vince Jr was on commentary and learning the nuances of pro wrestling, but perhaps was thinking one day how he would change it to more entertainment based. However, in the early days of WWF he would still use the blueprint of his father. It is interesting that decades later someone in his family would then transform what he created into their own vision with HHH. Unlike his father he was not willing to pass or sell it to family members, but of course the company is totally different now being on Wall Street.

Vince always wanted to keep things private, so he wouldn't lose control. He was able to do this and was forced to after Ted Turner put the competition wheels to him. Turner ended up doing exactly what Vince did to the territories raiding their biggest stars. Bischoff even at one point called him the Verne Gagne of the 90s lol.

I think Vince Mcmahon up until post WM 3 kept a lot of the old school lessons and blueprint from his father. The success of WM 3 and even Big Event in Toronto perhaps made Vince Jr think he knew how to make things even bigger than his dad ever dreamed and went more Walt Disney by 1989 with the production. He wanted to be called the Walt Disney of wrestling anyways.

While this is going on, Vince pisses off all the old timers breaking rules that they all agreed to having to make a living. He already had people like Harley Race and Verne Gagne threatening Hogan lol. That was the first swing at the armor of the WWF and the second was breaking kayfabe in courts. Vince wanted to do real cinema ironically like his son in law now claims WWE as. The bringing in Zeus character that was Hogan's rival in No Holds Barred was next level kayfabe breaking too. However, they were scorching hot in 1989 and things were looking up for Hogan in movies as Vince looked to the future with Ultimate Warrior. The very thing Vince's dad would not have Hogan do his son went to the other limit with it encouraging Hogan into movies and mixing it with pro wrestling.

The irony also comes into play that Vince used the fame of Rocky 3 with Mr. T to help launch WrestleMania. Something his father would most likely not do either as Piper was not too fond of it either being old school. He would end up leaving two years later for Hollywood lol.

Vince also created larger than life athletes where the intrigue would be their size such as Andre The Giant. Even if people would rag wrestling for being fake, the one thing it had was larger than life humans who the average Joe would not be able to step up to to test their "realness." This bubble also burst in 1991 with the Goerge Zahorian news outbreak with the steroid scandal. That was another blow to the business and by this time in 1992 they try to revert back to the era before Hulkamania.

They have guys like Ric Flair, Randy Savage, and Bret Hart become the WWF Champion and even brought back Bob Backlund. The damage was done and they would struggle for years, but something strange happened when Hogan jumped ship to Turner. He turned heel and turned things upside down and eventually get into your post basically. It caught fire as Hogan now shed that same corporate image Vince created for him and fans thought they were now seeing the real Hogan who had lied on national televison over steroid abuse.

Before that Vince tried to make a new corporate champion for the masses and all failed with Diesel and Luger, but Steve Austin who fans knew for real was politicked and fired other places now seemed like their guy. Vince didn't get it at first because he still had the vision for Rocky Maivia which in truth if it was the decade before he probably would have been huge with that presentation.

Everything changed due to Nitro forcing Vince and the characters became more organic with reality of fans reactions and the stories as well such as Canada vs USA. Fast forward that to recent years where Vince became sort of in the position of his father clashing with HHH's vision of NXT for future stars. He tried to prevent the inevitable as his father, but eventually he got the boot creatively and from the company. All the things his father tried to prevent with certain rules all broken by his son some may say is karma coming back to him.

He didn't want his son wrestling or mix wrestlers with executives in relationships. Bret Hart who grew up in the business and had a promoter father says the new wrestlers wrestle more like him than Hogan due to being more pro wrestler traditionally. The same issue guys like Backlund and Harley Race had.

Vince is also seen as a crazy old perverted man in his last days lost all his creative flair as the company he built is kind of back being a NWA style heel heat champ platform. It has all come full circle.


Imagine Vince Sr could see this timeline lol.

"I fired Hulk Hogan for a reason. Now it came back to bite you in the butt son. You broke kayfabe. You made movies. You made the kids get into the business and wrestle. You even wrestled when I vetoed that. You did great, but now my name is not connected to MY CREATION."




:vkm:"I made the company into a billion dollar entity though dad."
 
I honestly don't think it would be as big as it got. Let's be real, no one has brought a vision to wrestle like Vince has. I mean yes, I think Eric Bischoff helped entirely reshape the direction of the industry, but Vince got it up to that level where someone wanted to challenge it in the first place. And once Vince is heavily challenged he just straight up does it better
 
I honestly don't think it would be as big as it got. Let's be real, no one has brought a vision to wrestle like Vince has. I mean yes, I think Eric Bischoff helped entirely reshape the direction of the industry, but Vince got it up to that level where someone wanted to challenge it in the first place. And once Vince is heavily challenged he just straight up does it better
There is no way wrestling would be as big I agree. Did he make mistakes along the way and perhaps did damage that can't be undone? Of course, but would millions of people have cared as much about pro wrestling? Not likely without his version especially 1984-1988. He doesn't have the golden goose produced the way he was in 1984 and 1985, NBC doesn't come calling with a production that still til this day made pro wrestling look cooler than it ever would have looked under the people running the competition.

Starrcade was the standard bearer and by 3 years WWF eclipsed it ten fold with WM 3.
 
I have to laugh at the WWE fanboys saying we wouldn't be talking about wrestling now if not for Vince. Was he a major player, of course. But wrestling was a thing long before Vince McMahon was even a thought. He didn't invent it like so many people think.
 
You would have to go back to the early 80s or possibly even the late 70s to even fathom what circumstances would bring change. There’s a million and one variants.

It’s like saying ‘what would telephones be like nowadays if Thomas Edison wasn’t alive’.

Wrestling could be dead and buried and only shown in carnivals. It could be the greatest show on earth and the number one sport in the world. It could be a made-for-TV enterprise along the lines of bad movies and Lucha Underground. Who fucking knows?

As for ‘there would be no Attitude Era’ or ‘no Hulk Hogan’ etc. Thanks Nostra-dumbass.
 
21 - 40 of 67 Posts