Wrestling Forum banner
Cancel
Create thread New Forums

Has Undertaker ruined his legacy?

Jump to Latest
41 - 60 of 69 Posts
#42 ·
Not at all but he should really, really stay out of the ring from now on. As one of his biggest fans since he debuted I say that.

But as far as wrestling goes and the way 90% of the guys can't let the money or the fame or the boys go then he's only doing what most of them do. He's on the top end of that since he's not in the indies or lower wrestling company etc.
 
#46 ·
Kentucky34 said:
Seth would have carried him actually.

That's the point though. Undertaker always needed to be carried and needed tons of help from the booking team to remain fresh. The true greats like Michaels need help from the booking team but aren't as dependent on it.
Click to expand...
Trolling again are we ??
 
Save
Reply Quote Like Like
#47 ·
Kentucky34 said:
Bret's 2010 run was an embarrassment but it only lasted for a few months.

Taker embarrassed himself for years.
Click to expand...
So has seth since leaving the Shield, like I said he is a sweet worker but so overrated in all other aspects, if you say he woukd of carried taker, either your just pwlin dumb or high as mofo all the time, can you stop mentioning seth in every post,,you mentioned taker , talk about him , ffs!!

The lowest rating ever and you think this is good, how old are you??
 
Save
Reply Quote Like Like
#48 ·
Taker should of retired after handing it over to roman, then he comes back after gettim a huge payday after the goldberg shitfest, he wanted redeemed himself in the tsg math with roman, at extreme rules 2019 , if he comes back after the matxh against AJ,,then it will be really disappointing, I've watched him since his debut, he is vinces go to guy, there like father and son, 25 years is a lot of time, he has dedicated most of his life to entertaining fans like us, he has had more surgical repairs than a old battered car,

One word describes taker LEGEND, and I don't say that lightly,,after austin he is the 2ND GOAT!!
 
Save
Reply Quote Like Like
#49 ·
Kentucky34 said:
The Rock got away with being a bit crap because he left before he really got exposed as a 1 trick pony. Undertaker should have done the same. He stayed around for too long and that ruined his legacy.

He was always carried by superior performers like HBK anyway and the last 10 years of his career proved that he was a hypejob all along.
Click to expand...
Your entire
Kentucky34 said:
The Rock got away with being a bit crap because he left before he really got exposed as a 1 trick pony. Undertaker should have done the same. He stayed around for too long and that ruined his legacy.

He was always carried by superior performers like HBK anyway and the last 10 years of his career proved that he was a hypejob all along.
Click to expand...
your entire post lost
Kentucky34 said:
The Rock got away with being a bit crap because he left before he really got exposed as a 1 trick pony. Undertaker should have done the same. He stayed around for too long and that ruined his legacy.

He was always carried by superior performers like HBK anyway and the last 10 years of his career proved that he was a hypejob all along.
Click to expand...
Kentucky34 said:
The Rock got away with being a bit crap because he left before he really got exposed as a 1 trick pony. Undertaker should have done the same. He stayed around for too long and that ruined his legacy.

He was always carried by superior performers like HBK anyway and the last 10 years of his career proved that he was a hypejob all along.
Click to expand...
Kentucky34 said:
The Rock got away with being a bit crap because he left before he really got exposed as a 1 trick pony. Undertaker should have done the same. He stayed around for too long and that ruined his legacy.

He was always carried by superior performers like HBK anyway and the last 10 years of his career proved that he was a hypejob all along.
Click to expand...
your entire post lost credibility when u called the rock a one trick pony
 
#50 ·
I'd use the word tainted, rather than ruined but yes.

I'm still unconvinced that the streak should have been broken by anyone, let alone Lesnar but if it was to be broken, then having it be his last match made sense even at the time, and not just now with the benefit of hindsight.

Not retiring at another opportune moment after his match at WM 32 is another blot on his record IMO, and I don't buy the "oh, the match wasn't a good enough one to retire on" excuse. The main reason it sucked is because Taker was too old back in 2016 and yet he's still going in 2020.
 
#51 ·
I eat mangos said:
No. In ten years we won't remember the bad bits. To ruin a legacy you have to consistently undermine your own good work for long enough that you become better known for the bad stuff. And to be fair, even Undertaker's bad stuff wasn't that bad.
Click to expand...
Even for a guy with a career as long as Taker's, 6 years of mediocrity, which it has been since his loss to Lesnar at WM 30, is a long period of time to forget.
 
Discussion starter · #52 ·
Carter84 said:
Taker should of retired after handing it over to roman, then he comes back after gettim a huge payday after the goldberg shitfest, he wanted redeemed himself in the tsg math with roman, at extreme rules 2019 , if he comes back after the matxh against AJ,,then it will be really disappointing, I've watched him since his debut, he is vinces go to guy, there like father and son, 25 years is a lot of time, he has dedicated most of his life to entertaining fans like us, he has had more surgical repairs than a old battered car,

One word describes taker LEGEND, and I don't say that lightly,,after austin he is the 2ND GOAT!!
Click to expand...
2nd GOAT? Are you serious?

He wasn't even the 2nd GOAT in his era.
 
#58 ·
TeamFlareZakk said:
NO. If anything Undertaker does his best to push his legacy to greater heights!

He wants retire btw ever he wanted Lesnar to beat the streak and that would have been it, but Vince wont let him.. Its Vince McMahon that is forcing him to stay around.. despite Undertaker's desire to call it a career
Click to expand...
You call signing another contract for 15 more fucking years as a sign of "wanting to retire"??? No, Vince is not forcing Mark to stay. He's COERCING him with huge money and Mark is taking it as job security. I assume Vince will want a few more matches out of Taker with the first 5 years, so I doubt he will be retiring yet.
 
#59 ·
No but i think if he came back for one more match he would. He's had the perfect ending for his in ring career.

Hall of Fame and the occasional appearance as the conscious of the WWE is perfect for me.

In fact I wouldn't be totally against him appearing on Sunday to prevent Orton from winning the title
 
#60 ·
USCena said:
You call signing another contract for 15 more fucking years as a sign of "wanting to retire"??? No, Vince is not forcing Mark to stay. He's COERCING him with huge money and Mark is taking it as job security. I assume Vince will want a few more matches out of Taker with the first 5 years, so I doubt he will be retiring yet.
Click to expand...
Vince McMahon is nothing but a old washed up piece of shit and is forcing him!
 
41 - 60 of 69 Posts
About this Discussion
68 Replies
38 Participants
Last post:
Riddle101
Wrestling Forum
posts
24M
members
272K
Since
2002
A forum community dedicated to all Wrestling enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about WWE, AEW, Ring of Honor, Impact and all forms of professional and amateur wrestling.
Full Forum Listing
Explore Our Forums
General WWE RAW Future & Past WWE PPV TNA Wrestling General AEW