well I would love to see the rock defeat this two guys , the rock has defeated every great wrestler, Except for this two I was very mad, when lesnar beat the rock at summerslam 2002, and then goldberg at backlash 2003
Uh, because it was the right thing for business. It established Lesnar as for real, and Goldberg would of looked like a moron if he didn't win his first match. Neither effected Rock in a bad way.
You do realize that the whole reason for him dropping the title was so Brock could get over and so Rock could shoot a movie? He was gone after that match and didn't return until the build up to his match with Hogan, which obviously is a bigger draw than a Rock/Brock rematch.the right choice was rock beating brock, retaining the undisputed championship and then lose the rematch at unforgiven
You do realize that the whole reason for him dropping the title was so Brock could get over and so Rock could shoot a movie? He was gone after that match and didn't return until the build up to his match with Hogan, which obviously is a bigger draw than a Rock/Brock rematch.
Okay, OP at this point still believes it's real and doesn't realize that "kayfabe accomplishments" mean nothing in the grand scheme of things.
Rock's career doesn't get a boost by saying he beat Brock. Little known fact, HE ALREADY BEAT BROCK!!! He beat him and HHH in a triple threat match. The result of that started the Brock/Rock build up to Summerslam, in which Rock lost. At this point, it's not like he needs that victory on his list of impressive accomplishments, especially when technically has a victory over Brock already.
That doesn't make any sense. I mentioned this before in another thread weeks ago, you have to pull the trigger in these situations in the first match. Warrior and Goldberg would of never got over to the level they got over at if they lost to Hogan first, then won in a rematch.the right choice was rock beating brock, retaining the undisputed championship and then lose the rematch at unforgiven