Who is looking good with their titles and who should just lose it? - Wrestling Forum: WWE, AEW, New Japan, Indy Wrestling, Women of Wrestling Forums
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 8 (permalink) Old 07-28-2010, 01:44 PM Thread Starter
SWAG/SPICE
 
swagger_ROCKS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 26,648
Points: 16,403
                     
Who is looking good with their titles and who should just lose it?

Sorry for the long thread title, but I wanna hear some voices who is looking good with their belts, and who should give it up already.

kofi kingston
sheamus
HD
miz
kane
lay cool
alicia

I think Kofi and Sheamus should have good title reigns along with lay cool till beth comes back. the rest i don't think should have longer title reigns especially the miz.
swagger_ROCKS is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 8 (permalink) Old 07-28-2010, 01:48 PM
Regularly Beating Up James Ellsworth
 
The+King_of_Kings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Manchester
Posts: 3,415
Points: 0
                     
Re: Who is looking good with their titles and who should just lose it?

Need long reigns: Sheamus, Kingston, Alycia & LayCool
Needs to lose ASAP: The Miz
Not Fussed: Kane & Hart Dynasty

Glory, Glory, Man United.
The+King_of_Kings is offline  
post #3 of 8 (permalink) Old 07-28-2010, 01:56 PM
Learning to break kayfabe
 
swolfdab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: 831
Posts: 133
Points: 0
             
Re: Who is looking good with their titles and who should just lose it?

Quote:
Originally Posted by The+King_of_Kings View Post
Need long reigns: Sheamus, Kingston, Alycia & LayCool
Needs to lose ASAP: The Miz
Not Fussed: Kane & Hart Dynasty
This.

VIRGIL IS UNDEFEATED AT WRESTLEMANIA.
Proud Founder of the I.M.4.H. Committee
I . MARK . 4 . HEELS
swolfdab is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #4 of 8 (permalink) Old 07-28-2010, 02:05 PM
Follower of Lockeism
 
NJ88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Cumbria, England
Posts: 13,482
Points: 3,180
                     
Re: Who is looking good with their titles and who should just lose it?

Needs long reigns: Sheamus, Layla/Michelle (if only to keep it off Kelly x 2)
Needs to lose ASAP: The Miz, Kane
Not fussed: Kofi, Harts, Alicia

Marking for: John Morrison, Randy Orton, CM Punk, Sheamus, Dolph Ziggler, Cody Rhodes and Jack Swagger.
NJ88 is offline  
post #5 of 8 (permalink) Old 07-28-2010, 02:09 PM
Learning to break kayfabe
 
mattrulesok!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 139
Points: 0
             
Re: Who is looking good with their titles and who should just lose it?

sheamus needs a long reign and i dont mind alicia so i woudl prefer she kept the belt

id liek to see kofi lose the ic belt to dolph after a good fued and as much as i liek the miz he isnt really doing anything with the us title atm
mattrulesok! is offline  
post #6 of 8 (permalink) Old 07-28-2010, 02:23 PM
P.O.P., hold it down
 
Notorious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Houston
Posts: 22,546
Points: 3,141
                     
Re: Who is looking good with their titles and who should just lose it?

Need long reigns: Sheamus, Kofi, Kane
Needs to lose ASAP: Miz, Alicia
Not Fussed: Hart Dynasty, Lay-Cool

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tupac Shakur
We ain't even really rapping, we just letting our dead homies tell stories for us.
Notorious is offline  
post #7 of 8 (permalink) Old 07-28-2010, 03:55 PM
Wheelman for James Ellsworth
 
PowPow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 647
Points: 0
                 
Re: Who is looking good with their titles and who should just lose it?

Need long reigns: Sheamus, Alicia, Hart Dynasty
Needs to lose ASAP: The Miz
Not Fussed: Kane, Laycool, Kofi

Sheamus should get a decent 3-4 month reign. A short second reign and he could become an Edge sort of transition champion. Alicia needs to hold the belt as that's the only way to get credibility in the cesspool of a diva's division. Long feud with Melina when she comes back should elevate the title. The Harts should get a long run to cement their position as the top team in the tag division, given that they create opponents for them. Holding the belts a while should give them good stature as long as it's regularly defended.

The Miz needs to give up the US belt as it's clearly a prop just to make him seem like a big deal, and he shows no interest in the belt on the show. Give it to someone like Bourne who the belt will actually elevate. Laycool would also be in that bracket if not for the fact that the alternatives are Kelly Kelly or Tiffany. I do wish the whole co-champion thing would fuck off because it's clearly done to keep shoving McCool down our throats and not make her seem secondary to Layla. It's totally devalued what winning the Women's title should have done for Layla. Not to mention it's highly confusing and it doesn't even make sense how they won it in the first place. How the hell do titles change hand in a triple-threat that also is a handicap match.

Kofi should get a long reign, again they need new opponents if that is the case though SD's midcard is not lacking in Rhodes, Del Rio, Christian all potential heel opponents. I wouldn't mind him losing the belt as long as he was going to get elevated. Kane I simply do not care for.

PowPow is offline  
post #8 of 8 (permalink) Old 07-28-2010, 04:54 PM
Number 30 in the Rumble
 
sean 590's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,621
Points: 1,795
               
Re: Who is looking good with their titles and who should just lose it?

Need long reigns: Sheamus, Hart Dynasty & LayCool
Needs to lose ASAP: The Miz, Alicia
Not Fussed: Kane, Kingston

https://www.wrestlingforum.com/signaturepics/sigpic189200_4.gif
sean 590 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome