The rematch clause is still in full effect - Page 2 - Wrestling Forum: WWE, AEW, New Japan, Indy Wrestling, Women of Wrestling Forums

 11Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #11 of 19 (permalink) Old 07-21-2019, 03:24 PM
alexa = greatest of all time!
 
NondescriptWWEfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 2,345
Points: 8,231
                     
Re: The rematch clause is still in full effect

i suppose wwe might think it builds up the character in kayfabe to "earn" a rematch so you can suspend disbelief a bit for the match. (the challenger isn't as much of a 'loser'). but in reality the idea of a rematch is still going strong, they just arrive at it differently in storyline.

they got creative with lexi's rematch for ER by having her minion win the title shot for her, but in the end it was the same result.

number 1 fan of The Face Of WWE alexa

Suffering from incurable Bliss Fever ❤️❤️❤️

Alexa Bliss - global megastar, Tag team Champion, future first ballot hall of famer, 5x singles champ and soon to be undisputed Raw and SD! champ

(sigh) oh, Alexa, how magnificent you are. Don't you ever get tired of being so perfect?
NondescriptWWEfan is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #12 of 19 (permalink) Old 07-21-2019, 03:26 PM
Blaze is Elite
 
Blaze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Crawford County, Ga
Posts: 2,684
Points: 4,261
                     
Re: The rematch clause is still in full effect

Something that would be nice sometimes, since they want to get rid of the rematches, don't have the person who could just get said "Rematch." win the match to get one, at least that way it's not always going to be "Well (superstar A) will get their rematch with (superstar b) sometimes let it be someone else so the fans are like whoa okay. Cause if the person who loses just "Earns" it back like that, than it's uh.



Blaze is online now  
post #13 of 19 (permalink) Old 07-21-2019, 03:31 PM
 
DoctorWhosawhatsit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: The Tardis, All of Time and Space
Posts: 11,727
Points: 37,064
                     
Re: The rematch clause is still in full effect

Quote:
Originally Posted by UniversalGleam View Post
Back in December last year the McMahons came out and said to all of us that rematch clauses were done with

they also stood in that ring and announced in december that the product would be changing and they would be listening to the audience.

its fairly well established at this point that the mcmahons are full of shit. It's just time to accept that they are compulsive liars and will not change anything until vince at least steps down, retires or dies because he is the main issue. Thats the bottom line. Nothing will change with vince in charge.

DoctorWhosawhatsit is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #14 of 19 (permalink) Old 07-21-2019, 03:44 PM
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 896
Points: 2,733
                     
Re: The rematch clause is still in full effect

Wait people still take anything Vince or anyone in WWE says seriously?
B0D2017 is offline  
post #15 of 19 (permalink) Old 07-21-2019, 07:06 PM
 
optikk sucks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: London, UK
Posts: 10,240
Points: 1,961
                     
Almost everything they’ve done since that segment has actually been worse than anything they did prior to it.

Let that sink in. We still have rematches but they bait fans into thinking there won’t be a rematch. Literal bait. This shit is crazy.

Vince is a senile old man who doesn’t understand his target audience. And what he’s done is hire 2 other old men as executive directors.

Instead of going back to basics, they add extra stipulations, implement dumb ideas and are genuinely doing the opposite of what I expect them to do.

does Vince watch anything but current day WWE?

If you look at a basic storyline in anything from wrestling to comic books and movies there is usually a bad guy who’s powerful and dastardly, does things to hurt good people. Then there’s the good guy who’s relatable - family man or humble (unless it’s iron man). In the first encounter, the bad guy goes over the good guy because the good guy isn’t as strong as the bad guy or doesn’t believe himself. But then in the second encounter, the good guy goes over because he’s spent the past hour working on himself getting stronger or fighting others to get his courage back. And then that’s the end of the feud. No more - there’s just 2 encounters but a lot happens in between.

Why can’t Vince do this? Just try it goddammit.
Leon Knuckles likes this.



Last edited by optikk sucks; 07-21-2019 at 07:08 PM.
optikk sucks is offline  
post #16 of 19 (permalink) Old 07-21-2019, 07:18 PM
 
Nothing Finer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,658
Points: 5,215
                     
Re: The rematch clause is still in full effect

Nobody said there weren't going to be any more rematches, they're just not automatic. If someone loses a title and WWE think there's still money in the feud then obviously they're going to put them together again. Scrapping the clause just means that you don't have those boring obligatory rematches where everyone knows who's going to win.
Leon Knuckles likes this.

Nothing Finer is online now  
post #17 of 19 (permalink) Old 07-21-2019, 07:20 PM
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 32
Points: 93
     
Re: The rematch clause is still in full effect

Looking at your post, technically, they have gotten rid of the rematch clause because now the same contender/ex-champion has to "earn" it in a predictable match on TV instead of the automatic title shot. With all that said, I don't know why anyone at this point would even try to make sense of anything WWE does. They've done this "new era" shit a bunch of times now and it only takes them weeks before they revert to the same old shit.

I do laugh at the "YOU are the general manager!" promo pointing towards the audience, and I laugh even more at anyone who actually fell for that drivel.
IndustryPlant is offline  
post #18 of 19 (permalink) Old 07-21-2019, 07:31 PM
WF's #1 Mox fan.
 
Mox Girl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: New Zealand
Favourite(s): Jon Moxley, Seth Rollins, Roman Reigns
Posts: 22,703
Points: 83,608
                     
Re: The rematch clause is still in full effect

Yeah, it was the AUTOMATIC rematch clause for former champions they seem to have got rid of. Corbin literally got 3 title shots in a row and didn't earn any of them but he wasn't the former champ so it didn't matter. Seth at least earned his rematch in that battle royal, they didn't just hand it to him.

But they're inconsistent cos sometimes they enforce it, sometimes they don't. I remember back in January when Mox lost the IC title, he didn't get a rematch for it and I was mad Probably a good thing in the long run, but at the time I was annoyed lol.

Met Mox on March 28 2015/April 2 2016/August 20 2016/April 1 2017/April 7 2019!!
Met Roman on April 2 2016/April 7 2018!! Met Seth on March 31 2017/April 6 2019!!

Upcoming shows: WWE Melbourne, October 23 2019
Mox Girl is offline  
post #19 of 19 (permalink) Old 07-21-2019, 08:04 PM
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,662
Points: 5,508
                     
Re: The rematch clause is still in full effect

That's why if there is a certain announcement, new match stipulation, or show change acknowledged on TV, you should take it with a grain of salt. The old man changes his mind so damn much, that it'll likely be gone and not referenced the very next week.

Remember when Mick Foley came out and said that the third hour of Raw from now on will have a totally different feel to it, it would have a grittier lighting and ring presence? Yeah, that lasted two weeks. On the second week, they didn't even do it until the last 20 minutes of the show. After that, never done or mentioned again. And it was actually a neat idea.

Or when WWE was introducing a new segment called "The Electric Chair", where fans would get to ask a chosen wrestler random questions of their choosing? That lasted 1 week and ended the same night that it debuted. All because Vince got pissed off that Sami Zayn mentioned AEW, which was the following Raw after All In.

Oh how about the Wild Card Rule, where 3 wrestlers of a show can appear on a different show, including NXT and 205 talent? Yeah, that was a big fucking lie. It way surpassed 3 wrestlers, and it was the same wrestlers jumping shows every single week. Also, the NXT or 205 guys were never even used.

http://orig02.deviantart.net/b39e/f/2011/039/1/3/randy_orton_by_spider_man91-d394l92.png
#BestForBusiness is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome