Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: In hell with Kane and Snitksy
Why are number of defenses/reigns mentioned more than their duration or length?
Because duration sounds more like a technicality and less like a statistic indicating superiority?
Corey Graves mentioned this during RAW and I too wondered this long ago. Isn't the duration of reign/combined reigns superior to their number, as the latter indicates inability to remain dominant.
Kevin Nash too mentioned this in a promo with CM Punk where he brought up Punk's title defenses and then condescendingly addressed their frequency.
Or perhaps Vince prefers his own jargon even if they don't sound as remarkable.
Last edited by JonnyAceLaryngitis; 06-24-2019 at 11:47 PM.