Re: How good could WWE be if they did things correctly?
Well me brainstorming for what would make it good for me?
No brand split
Actual storylines that develop and come to a conclusion.
A more streamlined roster. Probably no bigger than 50 full time wrestlers.
Keep the part-timers for guest spots in the Royal Rumble and special attraction matches at Wrestlemania.
Keep part-timers away from the Titles. Keep the titles for the wrestlers who are full time
Creative freedom for Wrestlers
Raw is 2 hours and Smackdown is 1 hour or 90 minutes and it is giving the undercard and younger wrestlers exposure.
One World Title, One Midcard Title, One Women's Title and Tag Titles
TV-14 product but not smutty or crude like the attitude era (Which was awesome but very much of it's time). More in line with popular movies and TV where characters curse, bleed and do bad things that will disturb and shock fans.
Save big matches for PPV's and use TV more for progressing storylines, angles, backstage segments, interviews and short matches
One authority figure for the men's division and one for the women. Make them neutral and only show up when big issues need settled
Make the face wrestlers likable, relatable, realistic and rounded
Let the heels be heels. Make them ruthless, unscrupulous and a genuine threat to the heroes. Don't just make them idiotic cannon fodder for Reigns.
No monthly PPVS. All we need is Rumble, Mania, Summerslam and Survivor Series.
Last edited by ScottishPsychopath; 06-08-2019 at 02:04 PM.