Should Reigns be the one to retire Kane? - Page 2 - Wrestling Forum: WWE, AEW, New Japan, Indy Wrestling, Women of Wrestling Forums

View Poll Results: Should Reigns be the one to retire Kane
Yes Yes Yes 19 29.23%
HELL NO 46 70.77%
Voters: 65. You may not vote on this poll

 23Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #11 of 50 (permalink) Old 04-21-2017, 12:20 PM
Trying to Impress Vince McMahon
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 6,115
Points: 20,104
                     
Re: Should Reigns be the one to retire Kane?

one last big run from the big red machine is all i want
BigDaveBatista is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #12 of 50 (permalink) Old 04-21-2017, 12:29 PM
 
RapShepard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 18,223
Points: 54,946
                     
Re: Should Reigns be the one to retire Kane?

Kane is my all time favorite, but Taker he is not. He doesn't really warrant a big time send off. If he did get one as a Reigns fan he certainly doesn't need it. Give it to Braun or Rusev

Sent from my Z981 using Tapatalk
RapShepard is offline  
post #13 of 50 (permalink) Old 04-21-2017, 12:30 PM
TEAM DARKLADY
 
THE LAST OF THE RED HOT REPPERS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: CASA DEL BAD SHIV
Posts: 58,344
Points: 293,167
                     
Re: Should Reigns be the one to retire Kane?

No, Jinder should retire Kane, Vince, and Roman in that order.

THE LAST OF THE RED HOT REPPERS is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #14 of 50 (permalink) Old 04-21-2017, 12:32 PM
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 858
Points: 2,617
                     
Re: Should Reigns be the one to retire Kane?

By the time it's all said and done Reigns is going to retire Taker, Kane, Lesnar, Angle, and Cena.
matta5580 is offline  
post #15 of 50 (permalink) Old 04-21-2017, 01:22 PM
Wheelman for James Ellsworth
 
Superkick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 741
Points: 2,326
                     
Re: Should Reigns be the one to retire Kane?

What is this obsession with Reigns retiring everyone? Do you seriously think that people will like him more if he retires every single legend? Soon someone will ask "Should Reigns be the one to retire Jericho?".
Superkick is offline  
post #16 of 50 (permalink) Old 04-21-2017, 01:37 PM
Team Narcisse
 
Flair Flop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Flair Country
Posts: 7,939
Points: 21,667
                     
Re: Should Reigns be the one to retire Kane?

I still stand firmly by my opinion that Kane and Taker should have went out together in one last match between brothers, but that's not what happened. Strowman looks like the best option now for me.



Quote:
Originally Posted by ByTor View Post
The only thing better than one Flair Flop is two Flair Flops. Wrestling would be better if more people did Flair Flops.
Flair Flop is offline  
post #17 of 50 (permalink) Old 04-21-2017, 01:59 PM
Regularly Beating Up James Ellsworth
 
mrdiamond77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: wales uk
Posts: 3,161
Points: 11,890
                     
Re: Should Reigns be the one to retire Kane?

No, but it should be another younger wrestler who does retire him.
mrdiamond77 is offline  
post #18 of 50 (permalink) Old 04-21-2017, 02:03 PM
 
NapperX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,452
Points: 7,680
                     
Re: Should Reigns be the one to retire Kane?

A new younger character claiming to be the long lost younger brother of Kane and Undertaker who then seeks some sort of revenge on Kane...call him Abel, and in a reversal of fortune, Abel buries Kane alive. It becomes a comic book series, a new leader of each generational theme. The Kane, Undertaker gimmicks and storylines have been successful all these years, and it can continue with a new lead and new character.
NapperX is offline  
post #19 of 50 (permalink) Old 04-21-2017, 02:14 PM
Scarring the Night Sky
 
emerald-fire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 4,987
Points: 71,961
                     
Re: Should Reigns be the one to retire Kane?

I'm not sure if Kane will get a big farewell match although he does deserve a memorable last run before he finally retires. If it does happen though, it should be against Baron Corbin.


Last edited by emerald-fire; 03-31-2019 at 04:22 PM.
emerald-fire is offline  
post #20 of 50 (permalink) Old 04-21-2017, 02:15 PM
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 100
Points: 436
                     
Re: Should Reigns be the one to retire Kane?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ImSumukh View Post
Why not ?
He's Da BIG Dawg. He should retire every old superstars like Big show, Mark Henry, Triple H etc.
This is a good idea for a gimmick. Roman wants to make sure that it's his yard now so he retires every vet on the roster who has any type of pull. They could make him a tweener but he would get cheered/thanked for retiring Big Show, etc.
Muskoka Redneck is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome