Match rules (I didn't know where else to put this) - Page 2 - Wrestling Forum: WWE, AEW, New Japan, Indy Wrestling, Women of Wrestling Forums

 1Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #11 of 11 (permalink) Old 10-29-2016, 08:14 PM
 
Jupiter Jack Daniels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Far Away From Uncle Ole
Posts: 14,675
Points: 7,214
                     
Re: Match rules (I didn't know where else to put this)

Quote:
Originally Posted by thaaang View Post
Basicly, I was just trying to get the meaning of the difference between matches with similar names.

Am I completely off, when I say it would be logical if a No Holds Match COULD contain disqualification due to the use of weapons? I mean, No Holds Barred could mean eye rakes, choking et cetera are legal, but weapons aren't. In an extreme rules match, the use of chairs and other weapons are legal but no choking and hair pulling or eye raking.
The bold doesn't make sense at all, since an eye rake isn't a hold and in the context of you saying a "no holds barred" match should, logically, be one where normally illegal holds are now legal, the only "hold" that would seem to be effected is a "chokehold" , which happens in regular matches, anyway.

For clarification purposes, a "no holds barred" match basically means nothing is off limits; there are no restrictions. Now, that definition carries over into casual, non-wrestling related use of the term, specifically in regards to debates that's a way of saying "everything is fair play". Basically, it's a real-world term used in professional wrestling with the same definition it uses in the real-world.

Quote:
Originally Posted by thaaang View Post
Then in a street fight - you take the match out of the ring and into the streets. If there is a referee, then no weapons and illegal holds are allowed. But if there is no referee then anything goes until one can't continue.
No.

The idea behind a street fight, initially, was that the competitors would wear regular clothes ("street clothes"), instead of wrestling gear and had no implication on the location of the match. Originally, that's what made it different from a "falls count anywhere" match, as falls still had to occur inside the ring during a street fight. Old school, some places would call it a street fight, some would call it a "come as you are match" or a "bunkhouse match". But, over time and in various companies, a street fight would pretty much be the same as a "falls count anywhere" match.

Quote:
Originally Posted by thaaang View Post
In an anything goes match, then that "anything" Means low blows, choking et cetera and no weapons (basicly a no holds barred match - "anything" (but foreign objects).


Quote:
Originally Posted by thaaang View Post
A person interferring in a match is considered in line of the use of weapons and/or foreign objects.
Then why would that be allowed but foreign objects aren't?

Quote:
Originally Posted by thaaang View Post
I don't know if my logical thinking is completely off. What do you think of my thinking?
I think you're overthinking things.

Jupiter Jack Daniels is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome