WWE applied for the trademark King of The Ring (as an event name), possibly returning? - Page 5 - Wrestling Forum: WWE, AEW, New Japan, Indy Wrestling, Women of Wrestling Forums

LinkBack Thread Tools
post #41 of 44 (permalink) Old 08-06-2016, 09:19 AM
Wheelman for James Ellsworth
Second Nature's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2016
Favourite(s): Charlotte Miz Becky Sami Nikki Alexa Jericho
Posts: 847
Points: 2,812
Re: WWE applied for the trademark King of The Ring (as an event name), possibly returning?

Hopefully it means something this time and no more King gimmicks please.
Second Nature is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #42 of 44 (permalink) Old 08-06-2016, 04:43 PM
Try being informed instead of just opinionated.
Aficionado's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Red Deer, Alberta
Posts: 3,350
Points: 1,294
Re: WWE applied for the trademark King of The Ring (as an event name), possibly returning?

It would be nice if they were to incorporate NXT guys in it as well.

8 NXT on one side, 8 Smackdown or RAW (whichever brand it's for) on the other. The finals would see the NXT winner face the main brand winner.

Aficionado is offline  
post #43 of 44 (permalink) Old 08-06-2016, 04:50 PM
Breathe with the Switchblade
Even Flow's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 19,472
Points: 141,637
Re: WWE applied for the trademark King of The Ring (as an event name), possibly returning?

If it's coming back, it'll probably be a Raw PPV event.

Even Flow is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #44 of 44 (permalink) Old 08-06-2016, 09:31 PM
IronMan8's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,984
Points: 6,404
Originally Posted by blackholeson View Post

I have said for years that this tournament should grant the winner a WWE title shot at Summer Slam. May I also add that the winner should also receive an actual "Brass Ring". I also have said that this tournament along with The Royal Rumble should only be held in Europe where this "Wrestling Royalty" can keep it's true meaning. Obviously 8 men are chosen, but I think the WWE should select the "8" men through the course of the year. Make this a spectacle. Now that both shows are live you could easily get away with not spoiling who is selected.

We often find ourselves bitching about "random" matches. This is one way to help diminish that. We know only 8 men will be selected, but we don't know when, or by who. It should be known that anyone can be awarded an invitation to the King of the Ring tournament. What this means is that every match counts even though we know all of the matches can't have qualifiers. It's a hook that never dies because each year we know the rules and this all works. It's like Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory. Everyone was awaiting their Golden ticket and that was the build to a large portion of the movie. The WWE could do same each year with this concept.

Why hold KOTR in Europe?

I think it makes because we have the WWE Network now. Make this it's own thing and I feel like having aired across the ocean as a non PPV type event, but more of a "Network Exclusive" gives it a breath of life that it has never had before. The crowds overseas are far better as well and they deserve the WWE live just as much as us Westerners. WWE sends it's best 8 over seas to prove that one of them is worth a WWE title shot at Summer Slam.
Great idea.

I've long believed the WWE Network affords the WWE the opportunity to expand globally in new and innovative ways for the reasons you've provided above.

They should build up a couple of geographically-specific yearly PPVs. A yearly major WWE event in a foreign country would feel like Wrestlemania to the local crowd, every year.

By extension, take Melbourne as an example - they go crazy whenever UFC, formula one, etc come to town. A house show now and then is never worth mainstream attention - but giving the city its own B-level PPV to make their own would build massive hype and you'd get super-hyped crowds putting the show over, mainstream and casual attention, and network subscribers in a region of the world where everybody has broadband.

India could get a yearly PPV too, where you empower the locals to make it feel massive. Plus it's a nice little point of difference between the 16 or so PPVs they'll be having each year.

The WWE should feel more like a worldwide event, like the Formula One does, rather than having smark-heavy US dominated crowds dictating every major event.


By the way, on a separate note within this same topic:

This is the type of PPV that should be used to catapult Sami Zayn into Universal Championship contention, or a Cesaro.

In kayfabe, how do you realistically win a King of the Ring tournament? What makes it different to every other form of "competition" or opportunity to win a title (such as the Royal Rumble, which theoretically favours the bigger guys)?

1. Competent at multiple wrestling styles. You need to be able to combat a range of different techniques from different wrestling opponents with little strategic preparation

2. Endurance. You need excellent endurance to wrestle multiple matches in one night

3. Strategy. You need to be smart about how you spend your energy, through the wrestling style you use in the quarter finals. Take two heavyweights using different strategies for example:
Kevin Owens wins his first match by grounding his opponent, making his opponent submit without expending much energy, while Roman Reigns wrestles a power style, diving over the top rope, multiple dead-weight slams, etc... it'd then be believable for KO to beat Roman Reigns in that situation - something Roman learns from for next year's tournament and becomes storyline.

Corey Graves is someone who can put over that strategic style of thinking about the product and that is the best way to make KOTR really mean something in the New Era.
blackholeson likes this.

Last edited by IronMan8; 08-06-2016 at 09:58 PM.
IronMan8 is offline  

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome