Meant "Break". Sorry to bother with what might be a silly question.
I'm asking this because I've read the rules pretty extensively and I believe I know why most are in place.
What I'm asking is this: Say a comparison thread is made is it acceptable if there is a reasonable question to be asked and a discussion can be held without it turning into a pissing match between fans of wrestler X and fans of wrestler Y?
For example: Compare the career trajectories of Nature Boy Buddy Rogers and Nature Boy Ric Flair. How were they similar? How did Flair differ from Rogers vs. what did he flat out steal?
Basically what I want to know is if a discussion like this can be accepted by the mods as long as it stays intelligent or is Brock going to come in immediately and Cena me and my comparison thread? Thanks.
I'm asking this because I've read the rules pretty extensively and I believe I know why most are in place.
What I'm asking is this: Say a comparison thread is made is it acceptable if there is a reasonable question to be asked and a discussion can be held without it turning into a pissing match between fans of wrestler X and fans of wrestler Y?
For example: Compare the career trajectories of Nature Boy Buddy Rogers and Nature Boy Ric Flair. How were they similar? How did Flair differ from Rogers vs. what did he flat out steal?
Basically what I want to know is if a discussion like this can be accepted by the mods as long as it stays intelligent or is Brock going to come in immediately and Cena me and my comparison thread? Thanks.