Do you reckon they begged Taker to stay?
For the past few years Undertaker has been allowed to basically take a year off and come back for the build up to Wrestlemania which is perfectly acceptable especially at a man Undertakers age who has done more then enough over the years. But for the past couple of years, WWE has always had the back-up and starpower with people like The Rock to keep the viewers drawn in.
With Rock seemingly out for the future and also Punk out, do you reckon they asked Taker to stay because of the lack of star-power that they have, and in my opinion - I think Undertaker is needed at the moment and is a great addition if he is to work live shows and pay-per-views.
You have to admitt it, with Rock gone - that left a huge spot, and Undertaker is a great man who is avalible and not retired and hopefully he feels good enough to go for one last full run. What do you think?
Last edited by VILLAIN; 04-24-2013 at 01:19 PM.