What if he won?
To me, if I see punk aginst Taker, thats saying he is on par with guys like HHH, HBK and all the other legends who fought him, those guys main even ted how many times combined?
that says punk is on the level of guys who have mainevented wm constantly
No, it doesn't. ACTUALLY main eventing WrestleMania does that. There's been a lot of throwaway Streak victims.
Or maybe like I was saying TAKERS match AND the WWE\what ever m,ain event ARE the main event, Punk has not been in either
Or maybe not. Unless you're doing WrestleMania in 2 seperate locations and these matches go on last AT THE SAME TIME, one of them is NOT a main event. Guess which one?
What would you say if he fought taker and he stoped saying that? would you still say he knows what he is talking about?
No, because he'd be wrong then.
Or maybe he just disagrees that the match he had was a main event, and in no way says anything about if he thinks only the last match matters
Ok, whatever. You're really reaching.
Like i said taker is a SPECIAL match, just like at the rumble, the rumble comes on last, that dont mean the wwe title is not the main event either
Actually, that's exactly what it means.
Yeah, putting Punk with Undertaker at Mania is "special", all right. You know what I mean.
Taker in many ways is BETTER then main eventing WM, becauseof the streak, to be in that match, is to fight one of the greatist of all time for the biggest streak ever
Thats no mif card no matter how many times you say it
Yeah, it's midcard regardless of how many times I say it, not because I'm saying it.
Losing to Taker at WrestleMania in the midcard is NOT better than main eventing WrestleMania. Nothing is better than main eventing WrestleMania.