Originally Posted by Phantomdreamer
What annoys me about this is Del Rio loses to Sheamus 3 times in a row, The Big Show beats Sheamus 3 times in a row and now we're supposed to believe that Del Rio can beat The Big Show? It's just dumb how this whole thing was booked.
Its meant to be unpredictable. Anyone can beat anybody, and therefore they're all elite (though you could see it as everyone being mediocre, too, but I don't). Del Rio had his losses in recent months, to Sheamus and Orton, but they wanna promote him, so give him a win over Big Show and put the strap on him. Btw, Sheamus' SummerSlam win over Del Rio was dirty (Ricardo threw in a shoe (lol) for Del Rio to use, but Sheamus caught it and hit Del Rio with it for the pinfall).
Also, Sheamus beat Big Show in a lumberjack match on the Christmas Eve Raw, in which only Sheamus got beat up by lumberjacks (unless we missed something during the commercial break). Yeah that's right, I paid attention to that, lol. I should've counted who took the most chair shots in their chairs match but I was too irresponsible. I bet Sheamus took the most shots, to weigh against Big Show's clean wins.
Oh, and Big Show didn't get a title reign as a "respect" thing for Big Show. WWE doesn't lose money out of respect for wrestlers. It built up the Big Show for the rest of his career, and I bet for a loss to Ryback at Mania. And, I think it builds the World Heavyweight Title itself, cuz Big Show is over as hell as just a dominant monster. I swear every time Undertaker held the WHC it was to promote the WHC itself, and not Undertaker.
Sheamus > Del Rio > Big Show > Sheamus isn't bad booking. Its unpredictable, and gives everyone their moments. Guys draw against each other all the time, so everyone has their moments and their claim to being the best.