Re: Official Raw Ratings Thread [Post All TV Ratings Discussions Here]
On the Lesnar F-5ing Vince, there was no confirmation Lesnar would have a Mania match, who would avenge Vince if he did, or if anyone would avenge Vince as maybe Vince would've avenged himself. Not the same with Taker and the segment that followed, which confirmed the Taker match. Lesnar/HHH's build didn't truly start until HHH returned to fight Lesnar.
Second paragraph, I don't even know where to start. Simply put, it shows the bias you're using. Rock's WWE Title match was set for Mania as soon as he retained the title and it happened to be Rock/Cena, and that's part of the build. Taker/Punk started with that segment and the announcement of a four way match to determine who would face Taker. Lesnar/HHH's build started truly when HHH made the challenge, but I'll also include the brawl as that was a physical confrontation between the two that wasn't leading anywhere except Lesnar vs. HHH.
And the last paragraph, again, is funny. You basically describe yourself there in this whole argument, as I've shown through the last bazillion posts I've made in this thread.
But ah well. Just to add a cherry on top, look at Kokepepsi's post (though that alone doesn't prove anything, in this case with two matches that are fairly close in ratings, it says it all). No bias... well, except obviously for obviously all the fans that voted Taker/Punk, because clearly they MUST be biased. At least that's what you're going by with your little jab at THANOS and Wrestlinfan35. I realize no one's ever going to be able to talk 100% accurately when it comes to people they mark for, and I'm not an exception to that, but you certainly aren't either Starbuck and your refusal to acknowledge this in the past (and acting like I'm the only one being even just partially a mark here) is what's making you ridiculous and hilarious here.
Last edited by #BadNewsSanta; 03-29-2013 at 01:44 PM.