CM Punk is not stale or boring. Haters, what possible justifications do you have?
CM Punk is the farthest thing from being stale right now. Each and every single one of his promos is different, contrary to what blind haters remark, and all of them are entertaining. CM Punk's charisma and genuine promos are something nobody else in the WWE is able to pull off because they all come off as cheesy or scripted. When CM Punk speaks, it all feels very real. He puts the extra "HMPH" to his promos that everybody lacks. If you believe all his promos are the same tired speech, you probably lack the mental capacity to appreciate the brilliance that are his promos.
If not Punk, then who?
Tell me who is better suited as WWE champion other than Punk?
Ziggler is not ready and would make a terrible WWE champion because he lacks ring presence and his mic skills are bad. His voice cracks too all the time.
Cena is stale. What can Cena possibly give us that he hasn't already? He refuses to change his alignment and brings nothing new to the table that we haven't already seen.
Ryback has the look, has the mic skills, but is too new to become WWE champion. Sheamus was made WWE champion way too quickly and as a result, it took a long time before people reacted to him. Now I can say Sheamus would be an okay WWE champion but even he can't be compared to Punk.
The Rock, of course, is suitable to become WWE champion but do we really want a WWE champion that will miss every show and not even make an appearance every week? CM Punk was hurt and he still came out there and talked smack to the crowds and entertained. The Rock can't do this. Also, what does WWE accomplish by making Rock champion?
The only person I can think of that would freshen up WWE would be if Undertaker became WWE champion, as it is something we haven't seen in a while. For now, though, there is nobody deserving or good enough to take Punk's place as champion. His reign is still and always has been entertaining. He may be a typical cowardly heel but he plays the role so well, I don't even feel like it's a generic gimmick.
Besides, Punk has many challengers he can still take on and defend his WWE title against. There's no reason to drop the WWE title from him and place it on anybody, when nobody is as:
- Good in the ring as he is (Even Punk botches, but so does Daniel Bryan. Some of you pretend like all he does is botch when he rarely does). Punk is a technical wrestler and can get the crowd involved in his matches. He gives matches life.
- The best on the mic we have right now, bar none. Only The Rock has a slight edge on Punk on this one, and that's really impressive.
- He's still fresh and entertaining.
- He's popular - hated or not.
Who can you possibly say is good enough to take Punk's title away and be fresh, something new that we haven't seen already that isn't the same old boring shit? Punk is always changing his character, and he does a bunch of little things that keep him not-stale.
I'm a Punk fan because he's the last good thing WWE has. Once he leaves, we're stuck with the same boring shit as usual.