What was with the recording quality? It was like watching RAW back in the 80's.... - Page 2 - Wrestling Forum : WWE, TNA, Indy Wrestling, Debate League, Women of Wrestling Forums
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #11 of 34 (permalink) Old 11-06-2012, 10:39 AM
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
ConnorMCFC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: (Sent to me from Heaven) Manchester (City you are my world)
Posts: 894
Points: 0
               
Re: What was with the recording quality? It was like watching RAW back in the 80's...

Difference wattage here in UK.

THE REAL BEAST INCARNATE

ConnorMCFC is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #12 of 34 (permalink) Old 11-06-2012, 10:49 AM
Humbled
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: DEUTSCHLAND
Posts: 6,531
Points: 0
                     
Re: What was with the recording quality? It was like watching RAW back in the 80's...

Ah, yes, RAW back in the 80's. Man, those where the days. :hogan
Patrick Bateman is offline  
post #13 of 34 (permalink) Old 11-06-2012, 10:50 AM
Rampaiger
 
tommo010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Glasgow, UK
Posts: 2,903
Points: 1,745
                     
Re: What was with the recording quality? It was like watching RAW back in the 80's...

Quote:
Originally Posted by TOM MADISON View Post
LOL, you guys.

It's because in europe they are recording in PAL and here in America our TV use NTSC. So, we get the PAL quality transfered into NTSC for American diffusion.
This! NTSC has a slightly higher fps


Last edited by tommo010; 11-06-2012 at 10:53 AM.
tommo010 is offline  
post #14 of 34 (permalink) Old 11-06-2012, 10:59 AM
Electric Groove
 
Oakue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 5,949
Points: 729
                     
Re: What was with the recording quality? It was like watching RAW back in the 80's...

Quote:
Originally Posted by TOM MADISON View Post
LOL, you guys.

It's because in europe they are recording in PAL and here in America our TV use NTSC. So, we get the PAL quality transfered into NTSC for American diffusion.
This is it folks.
Oakue is offline  
post #15 of 34 (permalink) Old 11-06-2012, 11:06 AM
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
Arm-Bar1004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 964
Points: 15
           
Re: What was with the recording quality? It was like watching RAW back in the 80's...

Quote:
Originally Posted by TOM MADISON View Post
LOL, you guys.

It's because in europe they are recording in PAL and here in America our TV use NTSC. So, we get the PAL quality transfered into NTSC for American diffusion.
Isn't PAL run at 50fps as opposed to 60fps for NTSC? I didn't really notice the quality change.
Arm-Bar1004 is offline  
post #16 of 34 (permalink) Old 11-06-2012, 11:08 AM
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
Davion McCool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 950
Points: 333
             
Re: What was with the recording quality? It was like watching RAW back in the 80's...

Probably PAL being converted to NTSC. American telly looks shitty when it ends up on our screens, too.


I mark for (right now):

William Regal
Shinsuke Nakamura
Dean Ambrose
Cesaro
Sami Zayn
Enzo Amore & Big Cass
Paige
Bad News Barrett


Infinite marking and endless love for:

Eddie Guerrero
Larry Sweeney
Macho Man Randy Savage
Davion McCool is offline  
post #17 of 34 (permalink) Old 11-06-2012, 11:36 AM
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
MidlifeCrisis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Western NY
Posts: 683
Points: 30
   
Re: What was with the recording quality? It was like watching RAW back in the 80's...

It was the format difference that caused the drop in quality for most I'd imagine. The reason you notice it is because you do have HD. For those few of us still stuck in the stone age with tube driven standard definition tv's, there wasn't any noticeable difference in quality at all.
MidlifeCrisis is offline  
post #18 of 34 (permalink) Old 11-06-2012, 11:49 AM
BELIEVE THAT
 
Spears's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Fearless University
Posts: 5,979
Points: 4,258
                     
Re: What was with the recording quality? It was like watching RAW back in the 80's...

yeah i noticed it too, maybe because the british has shitty quality for cameras lol
Spears is offline  
post #19 of 34 (permalink) Old 11-06-2012, 03:28 PM
[R]
 
~Humanity~'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,762
Points: 0
                 
Re: What was with the recording quality? It was like watching RAW back in the 80's...

It's always looked slightly different when the record in the UK



~Humanity~ is offline  
post #20 of 34 (permalink) Old 11-06-2012, 03:30 PM
AND YOU SHINE MY SHOES IF I WANT YOU TO
 
Punkholic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Miami
Posts: 9,531
Points: 1,037
                     
Re: What was with the recording quality? It was like watching RAW back in the 80's...

RAW was much, much better back during the 80's!

Punkholic is offline  
Reply

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome