Ratings means something to the company but I see no reason to base anything off it as a viewer. A viewer should just want quality.
McDonald's makes the most money out of any restaurant chain, but it hardly means that they serve quality food. If Lady Gaga sells more albums than another doesn't really mean that she has to be a more competent musician.
Ratings are only relevant to you being entertained if you're actively trying to mainstream.
McDonald analogy is flawed.Rating means everything
to WWE whether you disagree or no-sell.That is why Vinnie Mac once upon a time was a billionaire.
Raw as a whole is a product manufactured by WWE.Guys like Punk,Guan Sena,Big Show,Hulk Hogan,The Rock are its commodities.TV ratings indicate the marketability of WWE's product.If nobody buys the commodity then your product is doomed to fail.If your product fails then eventually TV Co. will look for alternative products that have marketability.It is all about revenue and revenue sharing.
,Attitude ERA was all about ratings,no?Who lost the ratings war and had to close business
Ratings = Entertainment! CM Phil = Low ratings
That is why i used the ROH,indy company reference in my previous post.Once again, it's World Wrestling Entertainment
and NOT Ring of Honor,right?