Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
Discussing ratings isn't really the problem... it's when posts are made like:
"Punk sucks he can't draw."
"Ryder's a fucking failure."
or even the other way around when that's all that's in the post. This thread isn't about Punk, Cena, Kane, Rock, HHH, or any of those guys, it's about RAW and the ratings. That should be the primary discussion, not whether one person is a draw or not.
I'm fine with it being a side discussion, mentioned in posts that have to do with the overall ratings, etc., but when the majority of posts in this thread probably have to do with whether one guy is a draw or not, especially since ratings is only one part of being a draw, it gets kinda annoying to come here and try and discuss RAW' ratings when you get side-tracked by the Punk stuff.
I wish we'd see more posts in this thread like Starbuck's after the quarterly comes out. He does discuss based on the ratings a little bit if certain guys draw or not, but it's primarily about how well the whole show did.
Granted I do know there are SOME people who do come in here occasionally and try to dispel the ratings importance, while others try to over-blow it based on a number of factors.
Edit: And there's not a little bias on both sides, there's a BIG bias on both sides for and against Punk. That's why these threads get as "heated" as they do.
I'm watching you...
Last edited by #BadNewsSanta; 01-26-2012 at 02:01 PM.