**The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here) - Page 770 - Wrestling Forum : WWE, TNA, Indy Wrestling, Debate League, Women of Wrestling Forums
View Poll Results: Do Wrestlers Draw, Or Does the WWE Brand Draw?
Wrestlers Draw 251 39.53%
WWE Brand draws 384 60.47%
Voters: 635. You may not vote on this poll

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #7691 of 9175 (permalink) Old 11-13-2012, 08:09 PM
Best For Business
 
Starbuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 20,551
Points: 849
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

at everybody marking out over a 2.6 or whatever it ends up being.
Starbuck is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #7692 of 9175 (permalink) Old 11-13-2012, 08:20 PM
The Red Beast
 
Might Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 21,002
Points: 5,931
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Dont see where anyone is marking out due to ratings?

Curious to see how the Punk,Lawler and Foley segment went. either the ppl who hated it who were saying based off FB comments ppl turned it off were right or the segment actually made ppl stay.

Anywahs as a go home show to SS it really didnt hype the ppv much imo. The ending was just funny though



Might Guy is offline  
post #7693 of 9175 (permalink) Old 11-13-2012, 08:54 PM
Lacing SCOTT STEINER's boots
 
SinJackal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,376
Points: 235
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jotunheim View Post
I will laugh like a madman if in fact, it gained ratings during that segment, the Punk Rating haters tears will be hilarious and I'm already predicting it

"this is disgusting, fuck WWE, and fuck the world, how they can gain viewers by doing something so awful!!"
I'm not sure what's so "hilarious" about a segment gaining viewers. Are you that desperate for CM Punk validation that a segment involving him gaining viewers will make you "laugh like a madman"? It was Lawler's return. Obviously it was going to gain viewers (it was advertised for weeks). Advertised as JUST Lawler's return btw, not as a Punk/Lawler confrontation.

Basic logic and common sense dictates that the main draw would've been Lawler returning since that's what was advertised. Punk showing up wasn't.
SinJackal is offline  
post #7694 of 9175 (permalink) Old 11-13-2012, 09:02 PM
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 731
Points: 0
     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by SinJackal View Post
I'm not sure what's so "hilarious" about a segment gaining viewers. Are you that desperate for CM Punk validation that a segment involving him gaining viewers will make you "laugh like a madman"? It was Lawler's return. Obviously it was going to gain viewers (it was advertised for weeks). Advertised as JUST Lawler's return btw, not as a Punk/Lawler confrontation.

Basic logic and common sense dictates that the main draw would've been Lawler returning since that's what was advertised. Punk showing up wasn't.
I forgot the other excuse "It was thanks to lawler"

I almost had a heart attack there
Jotunheim is offline  
post #7695 of 9175 (permalink) Old 11-13-2012, 09:22 PM
Learning to break kayfabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 23
Points: 0
 
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

If a segment involving Punk gains viewers it's always the guy he's with that's the reason, never him.

If a segment involving Punk would happen to lose viewers it's always Punk's fault, never the guys he's with.

The Punk haters are so predictable.
Mockfrog is offline  
post #7696 of 9175 (permalink) Old 11-14-2012, 03:23 AM
Lacing SCOTT STEINER's boots
 
SinJackal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,376
Points: 235
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jotunheim View Post
I forgot the other excuse "It was thanks to lawler"

I almost had a heart attack there
The segment was advertised as Lawler's return, which was an anticipated event. So he should get most of the credit for increases in viewership. Not a guy who randomly showed up and was on mic for a few minutes.

You can't actually be that dumb, so I will give you the benefit of the doubt and just chalk up your shitty posts as Punk mark trolling, rather than just assume you're a total imbecile.

SinJackal is offline  
post #7697 of 9175 (permalink) Old 11-14-2012, 10:08 AM
Vince gives me a comedy gimmick
 
#1Peep4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 6,421
Points: 177
                 
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by SinJackal View Post
The segment was advertised as Lawler's return, which was an anticipated event. So he should get most of the credit for increases in viewership. Not a guy who randomly showed up and was on mic for a few minutes.

You can't actually be that dumb, so I will give you the benefit of the doubt and just chalk up your shitty posts as Punk mark trolling, rather than just assume you're a total imbecile.

it wasnt just a few minutes probably half the segment... then again i am not so sure about it whatever..

#1Peep4ever is offline  
post #7698 of 9175 (permalink) Old 11-14-2012, 11:20 AM
Little Poppa Pump
 
TheF1BOB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: UK, England
Posts: 2,376
Points: 3
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Choke2Death View Post
I assume the Fruit did so well in the main event that it brought the viewership above the 4 million mark. EAT FRUITY PEBBLES AND YOU'LL DRAW!!!
DA FRUITY PEBBLE IS STRONG WIT DIS ONE

TheF1BOB is offline  
post #7699 of 9175 (permalink) Old 11-14-2012, 11:53 AM
Respect My Pimphand..
 
THANOS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 10,518
Points: 4,966
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Starbuck View Post
at everybody marking out over a 2.6 or whatever it ends up being.
Dude your posts in here have really went downhill in the past few weeks. Trying to extrapolate excuses some Punk fans have for the ratings to make it seem like a majority response , when it's quite obvious to everyone with two eyes that its the opposite with people lining up to take shots at Punk.

I always thought that I was the Samaritan in that story (Fisk)

What the hell does that mean? (Officer)

It means that I'm not the Samaritan. That I'm not the priest, or the Levite. That I am the ill intent... who set upon the traveler on a road that he should not have been on. (Fisk)




Thanos is only beaten because he allows himself to be, and he only allows himself to be beaten because, in spite of his ambition to attain ultimate power, he sub-consciously knows that he's not worthy of it.
~ Adam Warlock
THANOS is offline  
post #7700 of 9175 (permalink) Old 11-14-2012, 12:28 PM
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 731
Points: 0
     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by SinJackal View Post
The segment was advertised as Lawler's return, which was an anticipated event. So he should get most of the credit for increases in viewership. Not a guy who randomly showed up and was on mic for a few minutes.

You can't actually be that dumb, so I will give you the benefit of the doubt and just chalk up your shitty posts as Punk mark trolling, rather than just assume you're a total imbecile.
aaaaand, reported, thanks for making my and mods jobs so easy

Jotunheim is offline  
Closed Thread

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome