**The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here) - Page 757 - Wrestling Forum : WWE, TNA, Indy Wrestling, Debate League, Women of Wrestling Forums
View Poll Results: Do Wrestlers Draw, Or Does the WWE Brand Draw?
Wrestlers Draw 251 39.53%
WWE Brand draws 384 60.47%
Voters: 635. You may not vote on this poll

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #7561 of 9175 (permalink) Old 11-01-2012, 07:37 PM
DIRK
 
The Lady Killer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 10,335
Points: 3
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Wouldn't consider Foley much of a draw anymore.





Credit: A$AP
The Lady Killer is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #7562 of 9175 (permalink) Old 11-01-2012, 08:21 PM
Yelled at by SCOTT STEINER
 
Jammy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,764
Points: 3
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

When ryback loses viewers, are we actually starting to use logic before typing? like length of segment and such? Wow

i thought ratings and logic were mutually exclusive.
Jammy is offline  
post #7563 of 9175 (permalink) Old 11-01-2012, 08:32 PM
People are Sheep
 
Santa Snoth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Snoth's Cave
Posts: 1,653
Points: 174
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Nobody tunes in to see fucking Foley. Give me a break.

And I'm sure if the leader of the group had been Orton and no Punk the number would be the same



ChampviaDQ
Santa Snoth is offline  
post #7564 of 9175 (permalink) Old 11-01-2012, 08:35 PM
Searching for a new identity
 
funnyfaces1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 5,709
Points: 1,882
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Somehow, Mark Henry is responsible for any kind of gain, not vanilla midget liberal Punk or old man Foley.
funnyfaces1 is offline  
post #7565 of 9175 (permalink) Old 11-01-2012, 08:50 PM
Ho!
 
#BadNewsSanta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 15,145
Points: 1,961
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rock316AE View Post
Ryback's entire segment was probably less than 5 minutes. When they gave him a main time slot segment, he did good. Two weeks ago IIRC in a match with Ziggler and Otunga.
It was a 512,000 gain, rating 3.04, however it was in the 9PM slot, which has a 100% gain rate, mostly around 400,000-500,000. So it was an average gain. However it's good he didn't turn viewers away and still kept up with the average, and actually it's slightly above average as a more accurate average (based on all Raw's in October) is 460,000.

That being said, I didn't watch most of the show and that includes the Ryback match, so I can't say what else was in the quarter. Only saw one post that said Orton/Barrett was in the same quarter. But I'm certain people are only trolling when they say Ryback isn't a draw. Like Punk, he's a draw to some degree, though not to the likes of Cena.

I'm watching you...



#BadNewsSanta is offline  
post #7566 of 9175 (permalink) Old 11-01-2012, 08:50 PM
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 731
Points: 0
     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by KO Bossy View Post
No wonder those segments did bad, look at all those fat asses in the ring. You got Seem Punk, who looks like he just came from eating a plate of nachos and cheese burgers, and then this Phil Brooks, and we all know how fat his ass is, because he's just a piece of white trash from Chicago, which is right across Lake Mishgin from that cesspool Canada, or as I like to call it, "MEXICO NORTH."

You want a segment to draw, you only need two things going head to head, and that's the largest arms in the world. The peaks of the Big Bad Booty Daddy will have all the freaks tuning into every segment, and those white trash ratings now will scream BOOM shakalaka and sky rocket to the moon!

Jotunheim is offline  
post #7567 of 9175 (permalink) Old 11-02-2012, 09:37 PM
Getting over in the mid-card
 
kokepepsi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 6,662
Points: 590
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by WallofShame View Post
Nobody tunes in to see fucking Foley. Give me a break.
Did he help Tna..............no

Quote:
Originally Posted by WallofShame View Post
And I'm sure if the leader of the group had been Orton and no Punk the number would be the same
Pretty much yes

kokepepsi is offline  
post #7568 of 9175 (permalink) Old 11-03-2012, 08:05 PM
OK Eggman, bring it on!
 
TromaDogg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Liverpool, UK
Posts: 3,229
Points: 285
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by kokepepsi View Post
Did he help Tna..............no
This is where the IWC, and more specifically, WWE marks are fucking hypocritical though.

You could put the likes of Stone Cold Steve Austin on next weeks TNA, announce it in advance and WWE marks still wouldn't watch it and would just carry on with the whole 'TNA sux, lolz' comments.

Have Stone Cold appear on Raw though, and it's all 'OMG! Stone Cold! He's BACK! Must tune in to see this! Best segment ever!' For some bizarre reason, there's a prevailing belief with these people that if a legend appears on WWE, then it will automatically be a better segment than if they appeared elsewhere.

Fact is, nobody they put on Raw will be a significant draw until the whole show improves. If I only liked one character in a sitcom but the rest of them fucking sucked and I didn't find most of the jokes funny, then I wouldn't bother watching it even for the 1 guy I liked. The current ratings suggest that there's a fair few people feeling the same way about Raw.

TromaDogg is offline  
post #7569 of 9175 (permalink) Old 11-04-2012, 05:42 AM
Working on my abs
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,973
Points: 586
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Hogan did boost TNAs ratings in the beginning. For example, his debut did a 1.9 quarter, with over two million viewers. So, yes Austin, Rock or Cena appearing on TNA would do something to their ratings for sure, at least for one or two shows.

The problem is a comeback, debut and maybe the first couple appearances always draw rating but after that they have must have a good story for the character to keep those fans or bring in new fans. That's what TNA failed to do with Hogan, who had his first angle (They) 9 months after his debut.
murder is offline  
post #7570 of 9175 (permalink) Old 11-04-2012, 04:02 PM
Asking SCOTT STEINER for Wrestling Advice
 
Kingy_85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 471
Points: 0
   
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

So RAW tomorrow is in the UK? What time will it be on? I'm guessing it won't be live on Sky Sports as it usually is over here?
Kingy_85 is offline  
Closed Thread

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome