**The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here) - Page 731 - Wrestling Forum : WWE, TNA, Debate League, Wrestling Videos, Women of Wrestling Forums
View Poll Results: Do Wrestlers Draw, Or Does the WWE Brand Draw?
Wrestlers Draw 251 39.53%
WWE Brand draws 384 60.47%
Voters: 635. You may not vote on this poll

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #7301 of 9175 (permalink) Old 10-24-2012, 08:22 AM
Little Poppa Pump
 
roadkill_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: The WWE Universe
Posts: 2,351
Points: 79
                     
Re: With the Raw rating being the worst in 15 years...

Some remarkable similarities with the end of WCW;

1) Not promoting PPV's, even in the run-in show
2) Going to three hours
3) Bringing in celebs for quick-fixes
4) Bringing in has-beens for quick fixes
5) Killing momentum of guys who are clearly over - Daniel Bryan was the most over behind Rock at WM. Fail.
roadkill_ is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #7302 of 9175 (permalink) Old 10-24-2012, 08:28 AM
Humbled
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: DEUTSCHLAND
Posts: 6,531
Points: 0
                     
Re: RAW in 2006 should have been the next "Wrestling Boom" wtf happened?

Wrestling is out.
Patrick Bateman is offline  
post #7303 of 9175 (permalink) Old 10-24-2012, 08:38 AM
HOV
Learning to break kayfabe
 
HOV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 159
Points: 0
   
Re: RAW in 2006 should have been the next "Wrestling Boom" wtf happened?

I agree, 2006 had the rise of RVD, Edge and the return of ECW. It all looked rosey. As for 2007, the Great Khali, Chris Benoit, Donald Trump its hard to specify what went wrong.

"With God as my witness, he is broken in half."

#HEEL

@Jamessi3
HOV is offline  
post #7304 of 9175 (permalink) Old 10-24-2012, 08:40 AM
OK Eggman, bring it on!
 
TromaDogg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Liverpool, UK
Posts: 3,208
Points: 222
                     
Re: With the Raw rating being the worst in 15 years...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scrotey Loads View Post
But I'm sure AD REVENUE has never been higher! And I guess that's what's important - not ratings - when you're a 66-year-old businessman who's done everything that can ever be done in the world of pro wrestling.
They won't continue to get high ad revenue forever with ratings falling the way they are though. The two go hand in hand.

What makes me laugh now is what Vince said when he was introducing the Attitude Era.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vince McMahon
We, in the WWF, think that you, the audience, are quite frankly, tired of having your "intelligence insulted". We also think that you're tired of the same old simplistic theory of "Good Guys VS Bad Guys". Surely the era of "The super-hero urge you to say your prayers and take your vitamins" is definitely, passe.
Basically, most viewers back then felt the exact same way about the show as they do now, WWE recognised this and addressed it and made changes. Now over the last few years, they've got straight back to this bullshit and viewers are tuning out in their droves again. It really isn't difficult to see the connection.

I don't want the Attitude Era back 'as was'....I don't want to see crap like Mae Young giving birth to a hand again, women taking chair headshots from men, anything like that. I do want a show though where there's a point to every guy on the roster being there, where you don't have 'Super Cena' hugging babies snd kissing fat girls, 'Super Sheamus' winning every match with the same move, or even the boring 'Super Punk' that we got for the first half of this year . A show where you have lower card guys featured in backstage segments and a half decent storyline to build them up so that when they come to fight in the ring, the crowd actually gives a shit rather then crap like Hornswoggle being named as the anonymous Raw GM, or that crap on Monday with AJ resigning and being replaced by Vickie. That's truly intelligence insulting to the viewing audience.

Am I, and all the other people who complain each week really asking too much?


Last edited by TromaDogg; 10-24-2012 at 08:44 AM.
TromaDogg is offline  
post #7305 of 9175 (permalink) Old 10-24-2012, 08:44 AM
Asking Meltzer to rate my matches
 
Duke Silver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,259
Points: 201
                     
Re: RAW in 2006 should have been the next "Wrestling Boom" wtf happened?

The rise of Cena and Batista heavily contributed to the success of 2006, but 2007 was a tough year. Constant injuries, shitty storylines, and the Benoit tragedy. I don't know if it's possible to pinpoint exactly why the WWE started to slide. It's more likely to be an amalgamation of reasons. By that point, people were starting to get tired of Cena and Batisita, Triple H was injured in January, Taker was injured in April, HBK was injured in May, Cena was injured in September, add to that list Kennedy and a few others that slip my mind. Raw was at it's worst and Smackdown had more than a few hiccups.

Basically, the product went to hell in 2007.
Duke Silver is offline  
post #7306 of 9175 (permalink) Old 10-24-2012, 08:44 AM
Works at Russo's Pizzeria
 
Fall of Arcadia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 24
Points: 0
 
Re: With the Raw rating being the worst in 15 years...

Quote:
Originally Posted by roadkill_ View Post
Some remarkable similarities with the end of WCW;

1) Not promoting PPV's, even in the run-in show
2) Going to three hours
3) Bringing in celebs for quick-fixes
4) Bringing in has-beens for quick fixes
5) Killing momentum of guys who are clearly over - Daniel Bryan was the most over behind Rock at WM. Fail.
There's just a lack of passion behind almost everything that we see on the show, it's gone on for far too long and it needs to change, CM Punk is practically the only one delivering passion in his promo's...

There is nothing in the desert, and no man needs nothing.
Fall of Arcadia is offline  
post #7307 of 9175 (permalink) Old 10-24-2012, 08:48 AM
Fired by SCOTT STEINER
 
BornBad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 5,458
Points: 734
                     
Re: RAW in 2006 should have been the next "Wrestling Boom" wtf happened?

Cena and UFC killed Wrestling

BornBad is offline  
post #7308 of 9175 (permalink) Old 10-24-2012, 08:49 AM
Acknowledged by SCOTT STEINER
 
MarkOut4Barrett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: England
Posts: 1,201
Points: 0
     
Re: RAW in 2006 should have been the next "Wrestling Boom" wtf happened?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 4hisdamnself View Post
Cena and UFC killed Wrestling
UFC, really?


Currently Marking For
Wade Barrett
CM Punk
Randy Orton
3MB
Prime Time Players

AJ
MarkOut4Barrett is offline  
post #7309 of 9175 (permalink) Old 10-24-2012, 08:50 AM
Learning to break kayfabe
 
The German Suplex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 146
Points: 0
     
Re: With the Raw rating being the worst in 15 years...

Quote:
Originally Posted by roadkill_ View Post
Some remarkable similarities with the end of WCW;

1) Not promoting PPV's, even in the run-in show
2) Going to three hours
3) Bringing in celebs for quick-fixes
4) Bringing in has-beens for quick fixes
5) Killing momentum of guys who are clearly over - Daniel Bryan was the most over behind Rock at WM. Fail.
I see the similarities but the WWE now doesn't have the competition WCW had. TNA isn't big enough of a threat to put the WWE in danger, which basically means that mainstream wrestling/sports entertainment has to die completely to put WWE out of business.

As for point 5, while I agree that the "18 seconds" decision was terrible and a slap in the face for everyone that wanted to see DB at the "biggest stage of them all", Bryan's reaction grew enormously immediately after the match and probably was at an all time high the Raw after WM. So I think, per accident, they didn't kill his momentum and Bryan probably would be less prominent on Raw if this never happened.



Name: Charlie Kelly
Favorite food: Milk Steak (boiled over hard, served with a side of raw jelly beans)
Favorite hobby: Magnets
Likes: Ghouls
Dislikes: People's Knees

Quote: "Yeah well, you've never seen me once wash my testicles either but that doesn't mean I don't do it every Friday."
The German Suplex is offline  
post #7310 of 9175 (permalink) Old 10-24-2012, 08:57 AM
Little Poppa Pump
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Seville, Andalusia, Spain
Posts: 2,427
Points: 223
             
Re: RAW in 2006 should have been the next "Wrestling Boom" wtf happened?

Quote:
Originally Posted by HOV View Post
I agree, 2006 had the rise of RVD, Edge and the return of ECW. It all looked rosey. As for 2007, the Great Khali, Chris Benoit, Donald Trump its hard to specify what went wrong.
2006: Young and really charismatic newcomers like Carlito, Mr.Kennedy, CM Punk and MVP. Legit uppercarder/main eventer talent like Edge, Jeff Hardy, John Cena, Rey Mysterio and Orton were still very young, and a great crop of stars headed by the enshrined veterans Shawn Michaels, Undertaker and Triple H. Also Batista, Booker, RVD, Kurt Angle, Kane, Finlay, Regal, Matt Hardy...

You cannot compare. Now there are people that think McGillicutty and Kofi are amazing. That says a lot about how standards have dropped.
Interceptor88 is offline  
Closed Thread

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome