**The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here) - Page 729 - Wrestling Forum : WWE, TNA, Indy Wrestling, Debate League, Women of Wrestling Forums
View Poll Results: Do Wrestlers Draw, Or Does the WWE Brand Draw?
Wrestlers Draw 251 39.53%
WWE Brand draws 384 60.47%
Voters: 635. You may not vote on this poll

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #7281 of 9175 (permalink) Old 10-24-2012, 01:39 AM
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
Revann's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Mississauga, Ontario
Posts: 609
Points: 87
     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by DenGal View Post
WWE should just hire Vince Russo and let the ratings man bring the magic back. Vince and Vince were a great team.
This.

A russo swerve here and there is much better than this crap.



THE BEST IN THE WORLD!!!
Revann is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #7282 of 9175 (permalink) Old 10-24-2012, 01:53 AM
===Valar Morghulis===
 
Genesis 1.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Attending the Funeral of the Lion of Lannister
Posts: 5,072
Points: 879
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redead View Post
how am i defending it, i fell asleep last night watching it

literally, fell asleep in my chair and woke up with aj crying or whatever. then vickie came out and i turned off the Tv and decided to finish re-reading the count of monte christo. its a very fine book. love it

my problem is with you chucky. your mentality. im not saying ryback will be bigger than austin, because he wont. im commenting that its unfair to hold him to his previous gimmick. my all time favourite wrestler, used to be 'mean mark callous'. but he showed everyone later how great he was

second, hypothetically if i liked the product. well then, fuck you. thats my choice. if everyone in the whole fucking universe, multiverse, across all time and space said something sucked, but i thought it didnt. then it wouldnt make a difference. fuck what everyone else likes, im not gonna like something for them, im gonna fucking like it because i like it.

and the ratings have often very little to do with the product a lot of times. ECW did shit ratings but some of the stuff they did down there with mick foley, Eddie Guerrero, RVD and Jerry lynn, cactus jack and such was amazing. why the fuck would i care about ratings if I enjoy the show? the only instance in HISTORY i gave a flying fuck about ratings is for my favourite TV show community. Because it is a work of art and it would kill me to see it cancelled. But even then i dont monitor the ratings on a day to day basis

seriously chuck. get over it

now if you excuse me, im in the mood for some curly fries
Repped for Truth.



=="Turn All Creation To Ash, Ryujin Jakka."==


Sig emerged from the dark & twisted mind of A$AP
Genesis 1.0 is offline  
post #7283 of 9175 (permalink) Old 10-24-2012, 02:14 AM
Celestial Messiah
 
reDREDD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 33,588
Points: 0
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by chucky101 View Post
ya and it sucks, back in 80s/90s it was less PC

watch movies like richard pryor and such, they did edgy jokes all the time in there movies that would never fly today

PG 2012 is alot different than PG 1983 or even PG 1999

are u saying you like this new soft crappy era?
if you keep putting words in my mouth son, im gonna shove my foot so up your ass its gonna occupy that space in your head where your brain is supposed to be

are we understood boy?

reDREDD is offline  
post #7284 of 9175 (permalink) Old 10-24-2012, 02:16 AM
.
 
Sheik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 8,232
Points: 0
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by chucky101 View Post
ya and it sucks, back in 80s/90s it was less PC

watch movies like richard pryor and such, they did edgy jokes all the time in there movies that would never fly today

PG 2012 is alot different than PG 1983 or even PG 1999

are u saying you like this new soft crappy era?
lol at people still using PG as an excuse for the declining ratings, or lack of interest in the product...
Sheik is offline  
post #7285 of 9175 (permalink) Old 10-24-2012, 02:18 AM
Celestial Messiah
 
reDREDD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 33,588
Points: 0
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

how u doing sheiky

reDREDD is offline  
post #7286 of 9175 (permalink) Old 10-24-2012, 02:19 AM
.
 
Sheik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 8,232
Points: 0
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redead View Post
how u doing sheiky
sup brothaman... just watching the main event of raw on DVR trying to keep my eyes open
Sheik is offline  
post #7287 of 9175 (permalink) Old 10-24-2012, 03:58 AM
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
StonecoldGoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Pakistan
Posts: 731
Points: 26
           
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Its not long before Tna shifts back to Monday and Start competing for ratings with Wwe once again..

StonecoldGoat is offline  
post #7288 of 9175 (permalink) Old 10-24-2012, 04:10 AM
Asking SCOTT STEINER for Wrestling Advice
 
FoxyRoxy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 292
Points: 0
         
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

I wonder if this is a big enough wake up call for Vince to realize his product fucking sucks? How much longer are we gonna have to watch shit like this. The ratings are heading into the 1.9-2.0's and that's sad to see.

Something needs to happen soon or else Vince will lose more and more fans.. I actually think that's what he wants to happen.
FoxyRoxy is offline  
post #7289 of 9175 (permalink) Old 10-24-2012, 04:27 AM
Yelled at by SCOTT STEINER
 
donlesnar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 1,704
Points: 560
 
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

the product has been different from how it was back then
its not a single guys fault
every segment with punk is f'n interesting..its not punks fault.
afterall, its the job of the babyfaces to draw more than the heels
punk was never the top face/draw of the company
even when he was face, they made him #2 to cena
now you cant complain that punk is to blame for it
donlesnar is offline  
post #7290 of 9175 (permalink) Old 10-24-2012, 04:37 AM
Learning to break kayfabe
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 129
Points: 0
   
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Household ratings are irrelevant. A18-49 and C3 are the only important numbers!
wb1899 is offline  
Closed Thread

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome