Challenging SCOTT STEINER's authority
Join Date: Nov 2011
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
I disagree with recent comments, looking back at older WWE PPVs they had something interesting going on on most shows, which also led to more people buying them. This still applies till today, see MITB last year, people want exciting matchups all the time, if there are no fights worth viewing then people certainly won't find the shows worth paying for either. When wrestling was still a hot topic, like when WCW and WWF fought against each other during the late 90s having a dull, filler PPV was not an option. Now obviously that's not the case anymore, WWE is not afraid of TNA and their 10k or less buyrates, but I don't see why from a fan, or a business perspective some people think that it's good having needless PPVs with uninteresting matches, especially since Lesnar is on a limited appearance sort of contract so Vince would want to make as much profit with Brock while he's in the WWE.