Wrestling Forum banner

Do Wrestlers Draw, Or Does the WWE Brand Draw?

  • Wrestlers Draw

    Votes: 251 39.5%
  • WWE Brand draws

    Votes: 384 60.5%
Status
Not open for further replies.

**The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

987K views 9K replies 852 participants last post by  Starbuck 
#1 · (Edited by Moderator)
For a list of the weekly rating dating back to January, please click here:

http://www.gerweck.net/tv-ratings/2012-tv-ratings/

RATINGS BREAKDOWN FOR THIS WEEKS RAW 4/9

Raw on 4/9 did a 3.10 rating and 4.29 million viewers. The show was third for the night on cable. The show did a 2.4 in Males 12-17, 2.7 in Males 18-49, 1.0 in Girls 12-17 and 1.1 in Women 18-49 with a 69.3% male skew. It was down 21% from the 5.46 million viewers of the week after Mania show last year, and last year there was no bombshell along the lines of the Brock Lesnar return on the night after Mania show.

In the segment-by-segment, Brodus Clay & Santino Marella vs. Dolph Ziggler & Jack Swagger lost 99,000 viewers.

Backstage with Laurinaitis with Miz an Cena, Marella looking for the Three Stooges and R-Truth vs. Cody Rhodes gained 255,000 viewers.

Lord Tensai vs. Yoshi Tatsu lost 415,000 viewers.

The mic work between C.M. Punk and Chris Jericho in the top of the hour segment gained 379,000 viewers to a 3.19.

Punk vs. Henry and the post-match with Jericho pouring beer all over Punk, as well as the quick Del Rio vs. Ryder match lost 169,000 viewers.

The Three Stooges in-ring segment lost 240,000 viewers and was the low point of the show at 2.90.

The Brock Lesnar interview gained 423,000 viewers.

And the Cena vs. Otunga match with Lesnar run-in gained 301,000 viewers, which is a very weak overrun number, finishing at 3.42.
 
#7,179 ·
Couldn't be bothered to even record Raw this week with GAME 7 this week and recording the debate on VHS as well. Go, GIANTS! National League Champions!
 
#7,181 ·
I personally stopped watching RAW at the beginning of the 10pm segment with Striker, Kane and Bryan. Not because of NFL or the debate, for the simple fact of how horrible, long, pointless it was with 90% filler on the show just to kill time. 3 hours is unbearable.

It's not going to be 2.1, but I can see a 2.4-2.5.
 
#7,187 ·
I honestly wonder if they even tried to make the show good last night or said fuck it and made it crappy and didn't care and said oh well fuck this week due to all the competion going on from football baseball and most importantly the presidential debate..... Either way if u look at it like this in 2008 the company just turned pg so they wouldn't really have to worry that much about low rating back then cause it was no where as low as it would be now due to it not being as shitty etc. but since its 2012 and its the like second presidential debate since the company is gone to shit since 2008. its gonna be low as fuck rating etc and they should really try hard to make it good imo.

anyways if they really were trying then imo they are fuckin dumb cuz that show was so fucking shitty last night. I honestly hope they get lower than 2.0 rating for this week. and i hope the ratings keep going down and don't improve unless they change this stupid product overall. make it more edgy and fuck off with these stupid shitty storylines. dumbass writers putting vickie guerro in wtf??????????????????????? I mean ya finally aj is gone as gm but shes prob still going to be getting a shit load of tv time now with this vicke/cena/aj angle shit. so dumb and pointless

anyways just my 2 cents
 
#7,188 ·
I love how they need to over emphasize everything now "BIGGEST LUMBERJACK MATCH IN RAW HISTORY".

If it wasn't for that lumberjack match I would have never known Mason was still employed.

Anyways, this fly by booking is seriously cringe worthy now, and it's been like this since the fuck up of the "summer of Punk".
 
#7,196 · (Edited)
The 22/10 edition of Monday Night Raw drew the following viewers:

Hour 1: 3.578m
Hour 2: 3.653m
Hour 3: 3.432m

Compared to last weeks:

Hour 1: 4.067m
Hour 2: 4.013m
Hour 3: 3.886m

The average over the 3 hours is 3,554,333.

The October 1st edition which was the lowest rated Raw in 15 years had an average of 3,502,000 viewers which had a 2.5 rating.

Yesterdays edition of raw averaged just 54,000 viewers more than the lowest rated raw in 15 years on the 1st October.

The final rating will be released later, but it should come out at 2.5
 
#7,201 ·
I suppose better than expected all things considered. Not a good number, but eh...
 
#7,204 ·
Surprised the ratings ppl would want a terrible number. Dont they have wwe stock? Shouldnt they want it to be better lol.

With everything on last night that number is decent. Hell during all of last night I forgot there was a MNF game. Last night was definitely stacked.
 
#7,208 ·
I think it shows that no matter what the competition is or how relatively bad the show is 3.5 million is the number of fans who will tune in no matter what's going on. That's their inner core audience that are currently remaining loyal. If they start dipping below the 3.5 million, or 2.5 rating that's when they're entering troubled waters.
 
#7,218 ·
I think it shows that no matter what the competition is or how relatively bad the show is 3.5 million is the number of fans who will tune in no matter what's going on. That's their inner core audience that are currently remaining loyal. If they start dipping below the 3.5 million, or 2.5 rating that's when they're entering troubled waters.
That number used to be 4.5 million not too long ago. They've already dropped a million. If they dip any further they really will be in troubled waters. This is better than I was expecting but still not good. Era of the 2s indeed. I wonder what will finally crack the 3.0 barrier and be considered a success lol.
 
#7,210 ·
Better than I expected to be honest. I predicted 2.2 - 2.5, but I thought it'd be around 2.2 or 2.3 to be honest, just because of the competition on last night with the debates, football and baseball.
 
#7,213 ·
That was a holiday edition of MNR and generally aren't counted when considering trends etc.

Also the Nielsen number of households which calculates the rating has been changed since July 2011. They also take into account the number of people watching television on a particular night.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
You have insufficient privileges to reply here.
Top