Wrestling Forum banner

Do Wrestlers Draw, Or Does the WWE Brand Draw?

  • Wrestlers Draw

    Votes: 251 39.5%
  • WWE Brand draws

    Votes: 384 60.5%
Status
Not open for further replies.

**The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

988K views 9K replies 852 participants last post by  Starbuck 
#1 · (Edited by Moderator)
For a list of the weekly rating dating back to January, please click here:

http://www.gerweck.net/tv-ratings/2012-tv-ratings/

RATINGS BREAKDOWN FOR THIS WEEKS RAW 4/9

Raw on 4/9 did a 3.10 rating and 4.29 million viewers. The show was third for the night on cable. The show did a 2.4 in Males 12-17, 2.7 in Males 18-49, 1.0 in Girls 12-17 and 1.1 in Women 18-49 with a 69.3% male skew. It was down 21% from the 5.46 million viewers of the week after Mania show last year, and last year there was no bombshell along the lines of the Brock Lesnar return on the night after Mania show.

In the segment-by-segment, Brodus Clay & Santino Marella vs. Dolph Ziggler & Jack Swagger lost 99,000 viewers.

Backstage with Laurinaitis with Miz an Cena, Marella looking for the Three Stooges and R-Truth vs. Cody Rhodes gained 255,000 viewers.

Lord Tensai vs. Yoshi Tatsu lost 415,000 viewers.

The mic work between C.M. Punk and Chris Jericho in the top of the hour segment gained 379,000 viewers to a 3.19.

Punk vs. Henry and the post-match with Jericho pouring beer all over Punk, as well as the quick Del Rio vs. Ryder match lost 169,000 viewers.

The Three Stooges in-ring segment lost 240,000 viewers and was the low point of the show at 2.90.

The Brock Lesnar interview gained 423,000 viewers.

And the Cena vs. Otunga match with Lesnar run-in gained 301,000 viewers, which is a very weak overrun number, finishing at 3.42.
 
#7,135 ·
1.9 will be beautiful.
 
#7,136 ·
It doesn't affect us so what does it matter. They could have the Rock, Stone Cold, Undertaker, Hulk Hogan, Rowdy Piper, Shawn Michaels, and they would draw a 3.2 at most in these day and age.
 
#7,141 ·
Or you know, stop watching and not give a fuck

There are infinitely better things to do with your time than watch a show that bores you, from a company you hate and you hope goes down the crapper

Someone said the Giant game, or football, or even the debate. Heck, read a book. Or play Resident Evil. Or develop alcoholism.
 
#7,142 ·
People like you completely miss the point.

A lot of us who don't like the way the show is at the moment actually want it to improve, because we've seen how much better it was in days gone by and know that they do have the tools there to succeed, they're just not using them properly. The only way they will be jolted into action is if there's a reason to. Like low ratings.

Yeah, I realise that it's hypocritical to wish them to have low ratings when they put on a crappy show, but still watch the show myself but it is what it is. I've been watching Raw pretty much since it began (and WWF itself for a while before thate even) so I'm not about to suddenly give up on it now, knowing that it's greatly entertained me in the past and has the potential to do so again if they stop pandering to a kiddie/social media type audience and just put on a decent wrestling orientated show that everyone can enjoy. I actually enjoyed the road to Wrestlemania and Extreme Rules this year (before things when rapidly back downhill again), Raw Episode 1000 was also good and we're nearly at Survivor Series now, so I'm sure things will pick up at least a little soon, even if only for the short term. I'll be interested to see what they do for the Raw 20th Anniversary show as well.

Complaining about how shit WWE have been in recent years and actually 'hating' them are 2 completely different things.
 
#7,156 ·
Yeah. . .ratings are probably gonna tank tonight. Especially during the midcard. If it's still 2.5, I'll be very surprised. Even though 2.5 isn't great, if they actually do hit that mark again, it should be considered a victory considering how watered down most of the show is right now. . .not to mention all the competion for that timeslot tonight.
 
#7,157 ·
Holy crap are they hyping up the debate tonight. On top of the NLCS and MNF. But if this was 2004 with them against the same amount of competition or if they actually had some sort of big storyline to get people to watch with starpower, the worst they'd do would be a 2.9.
 
#7,159 ·
it would be shocking if it did more than 2.5, 2.5 is best case scenario

more likely it will be 2.3-2.4, maybe even worse

its tough to call, how knows how many normal wrestling fans are also debate/mlb fans, so its tough, it could be as low as 2.2 or as high as 2.5

if vince gets a 2.5 consider himself lucky

i predict 2.3-2.4 range, but it could even be lower
 
#7,160 ·
I can't see them doing less than 2.0, but a sub 2.5 is fairly conceivable given what else is on US TV at the same time.

Though it's not just the competition that's killing their ratings, it's the rut that their product has fallen into in recent months.

They seem to be putting all their eggs in one basket and hoping that Ryback is going to be their 'saviour' of sorts. I'll keep my opinions about him to the Ryback Discussion thread, but I'm not convinced. We'll see over the next few weeks.
 
#7,161 ·
ryback is not the saviour, vince thinks he is but he will be a bust

the fact that there putting all there eggs in the basket shows how bad and desperate they are, the product has been so bad for so long they need some long term solutions

start pushing younger talent like ambrose/ziggler/rollins/etc

either that or keep seeing the rating fall and short term bandage solutions
 
#7,168 ·
With the competition alone, I don't expect a huge rating. I said 2.4-2.6 yesterday, but I'll change that to 2.2-2.5. I don't think they go below 2.0... yet.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
You have insufficient privileges to reply here.
Top