Wrestling Forum banner

Is Reigns getting booed really a bad thing?

8K views 101 replies 69 participants last post by  DJHJR86 
#1 ·
I mean, the crowd didn't give a fuck about anybody in the match, not even Rollins.

But they stop doing whatever they were doing only to start booing Reigns, every move, every single thing he did was booed. They hate Reigns with passion- I don't know if this is a really bad thing because even if he isn't getting a baby face reaction, the crowd is into him.
 
#10 · (Edited)
Reigns is acting more like a tweener lately, i would say his character right now doesn't depend of the crowd anymore, but the crowd is ready to boo him regardless anything and above anything, i think this is good because if they showing passion towards him.

He is different to Cena, he doesn't come to the ring to pender the crowd and and cut a political speech, even if he's booed, i like how his character just don't give a fuck.
 
#36 · (Edited)
Translation : "I'm interested in Reigns reactions outside of cities where the I.Q level of the average wrestling fan is above 80"


Then getting cheered as a heel is just as bad. You cant have it both ways.
Nope, that's vastly different. Heels can get cheered for quite a few reasons, including going against a face nobody likes (rings a bell ?) or simply being awesome at their jobs, by crowds that couldn't care less about kayfabe.

When a face is getting booed, it can only mean that he's actually doing bad. A good face vs even a "well-liked" heel would result in cheers for both.
 
#9 ·
I wouldn't say the fans didn't care. Ryback got a good reaction when he went for shellshocked.

People are still sour on Reigns push and possibly worried all roads lead to him soon enough anyway. It will take time or some change of direction to convince them otherwise or at least to wear off.
 
#20 ·
Perfect night to turn him.

They are persisting with the forced babyface push though. Why i have no idea.


As long as he's in the midcard i don't give a fuck. I'd rather they did something different with him but if this is what they want i just don't care as long as he isn't main eventing.

It will never get over enough to succeed.
Gotta replace Cena fast. Seriously it's like Vince just woke up and realized he hasn't made any real stars (Punk and Bryan made themselves) in the last 10 years so he has to play catch-up.
 
#25 ·
Maybe I'm an idiot for just realizing this now, but this whole time I thought they gave Bryan and Cena mid card titles to elevate those belts. The more I think about it though, did they do that just to get Reigns' two biggest M.E. babyface contenders out of the way, in an attempt to get the fans to go "well, it's either root for this guy or no one"? Not thinking they would ever consider rooting for heels, which they've done with Rollins and Lesnar.

I mean, they wouldn't do that, would they?
 
#33 ·
They hate Reigns with passion
No, they hate Vince's "face of the company" philosophy. Vince is trying to place Roman Reigns in the top spot, but after a decade of John Cena, fans are simply hostile to the very notion of a top spot. And they're protesting it by booing the heir apparent. What these fans want is for WWE to diversify their investments instead of putting it all on one guy. They want some variety. Problem is, those fans are at odds with an important demographic, kids and their casual parents, who want one hero with a supporting cast surrounding him.
 
#41 ·
Yes it is bad, very bad; especially when he is supposed to be the top babyface.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarkLady
#43 ·
Yes. Because it's now bordering on X-Pac / Go Away heat.
 
#45 ·
Faces getting boo's is a bad thing, they are meant to be fan favourites, remember?
 
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top