Why is anyone arguing with the OP? He's never going to accept that 17 was the GOAT WM
Please do not waste my time with idiotic statements like this. This is all completely a matter of opinion, there are no facts involved in this. It's about the reasoning behind your opinions that I care about, and so far from what I've seen, not a lot of them have made sense.
and has completely convinced himself that 19 was better, going as far to say that there was absolutely nothing bad on the card (the Taker match and the Miller catfight girls beg to differ).
The Miller Cat fight was not an official match on the card. If you can't even get simple parts like this right why should I take the rest of your post seriously?
And the Taker match was most certainly not a bad match. It wasn't anything special, but they deserve a lot of credit for managing to make the match itself turn out to be decent.
He also way over hypes the matches that were good. Brock/Angle was very solid, Rock/Austin 3 was as well and Jericho/HBK was MOTN, IMO. However, in terms of importance, outcome build, NOTHING on the WM19 card can hold a candle to Rock/Austin 2.
When was I ever denying any of this? I was talking about the wrestling aspect, NOTHING MORE. That is it. You guys can't bring out all this irrelevant bullshit and expect me to think it makes a difference. It doesn't.
On the whole, 17 had the better wrestling (and that includes everything-not just technicality), better storytelling, better hype, better crowd, more important matches, better buys, and overall the best matches. Every match on that card had a built up story and all of the stories had a conclusion or satisfying way of continuing the feud. That's the point of WM, to be that season finale of the wrestling year and 17 did that better than 19 did.
WM 17 had a lot of great wrestling, yes, but for as many good matches, they had almost as many bad or worthless matches, the part you cannot deny. The fact you're trying to make excuses for that pretty much shows that you know I am right. The only thing I have convinced myself of is that, when talking about consistency, WM 19 consistently had better wrestling than WM 17 did, and if you deny that, then you don't understand the concept of the word "consistency". And WM 19 definitely had a shit ton of great wrestling, and imo beats out WM 17 as a whole. The atmosphere of course was better, as was the crowd. And yes they had more important matches. But none of that is relevant to what I am trying to say. If you can't understand that, then I can't help you.