Originally Posted by Slowhand
Punk/Heyman have history and it's way better like this. Besides, Heyman refers to Brock like he's his pet gorilla, beating people up at his every command. Brock is a beast with no backbone, plus he can't talk for shit. He opens his mouth, Punk will crush him on the mic and there goes the feud.
Bolded the dumb parts.
Brock has no backbone now?
When you're ready to get back to reality, let us know.
Punk wouldn't crush shit on the mic either. Brock could just break Punk's face if he insulted him. Alpha male badassery trumps mouth-running clowns who can't back it up.
The lynch pin of Punk getting over people on the mic (as is the case for just about anyone who gets over on the mic) is that he's booked to not be countered effectively. It isn't that Punk is good on the mic. If, for example, The Rock punched CM Punk in his face like he should have when Punk made the "boxing with god" comment, then it looks like Punk wrote a check his ass couldn't cash and looks like a fool. Instead, Rock was booked to say an d do nothing so Punk looked good.