Royal Rumble Buys - Page 4 - Wrestling Forum : WWE, TNA, Debate League, Wrestling Videos, Women of Wrestling Forums
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #31 of 63 (permalink) Old 03-12-2013, 09:31 PM
Moron
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,758
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: Royal Rumble Buys

Quote:
Originally Posted by Choke2Death View Post
He was away for like 7 years and only appears a total amount of 2 months every year. How come they don't develop any new stars during all that time?

The part-timers are nothing more than the scapegoat for WWE's inability to create stars. Take Ryback for an example. They could've turned him into a big name by now but instead they've jobbed him out in every single match he's had that matters. I would certainly not blame THE ROCK because they booked him so badly. And it looks like he wont even get his revenge against The Shield after 3 losses now.
-It's not Rock's fault for WWE not creating stars

-Ryback is a great example.Here was a guy who was the most over guy since Jeff Hardy in 2009 and WWE completely killed his momentum
austin316 G.O.A.T is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #32 of 63 (permalink) Old 03-12-2013, 11:01 PM
Challenging SCOTT STEINER's authority
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 4,846
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
                   
Re: Royal Rumble Buys

the big jump in domestic has to have the WWE creamin' their pants.

Great number.
RKing85 is offline  
post #33 of 63 (permalink) Old 03-12-2013, 11:03 PM
✯✯✯ Kissing Under the Mistletoe ✯✯✯
 
Clique's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Irving, TX by way of Chicago, IL
Posts: 18,633
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: Royal Rumble Buys

Quote:
Originally Posted by Proc View Post
Compared to previous years:

2012 443,000
2011 446,000
2010 462,000
2009 450,000
2008 533,000
Damn, Orton/Hardy did big business that year.

This year's number is impressive though. There was a lot of hype surrounding the event and it looks to have paid off for Rock/Punk and WWE.


THIS CHRISTMAS
ALL I'M REALLY ASKING FOR IS YOU

Clique is offline  
post #34 of 63 (permalink) Old 03-13-2013, 12:16 AM
Yelled at by SCOTT STEINER
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: India- Land of the Tiger
Posts: 1,542
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: Royal Rumble Buys

Its amazing that (some)people are blaming The Rock for WWE's failure of creating new superstars.When someone shuts his eyes off from the truth,what more can you say.But one thing is sure neither these people understand the business side of things,nor do they care to understand!


Also WWE just can't create new stars,new stars need to get over by their own talent.Take the example of Rock himself.WWE pushed him as first third generation wrestler 'Rocky Maivia' and what happened,he became one of the most hated superstars of all time.But he worked hard,and became the biggest star of all time in The Rock,even though WWE never really booked him like Superman/invincible (like Austin).


Understand it bro,there is no substitute for talent and hard work.If there are no superstars in the WWE right now,don't blame The Rock,blame their own talent or work ethics(or lack of it).

THE ROCK: The biggest star and draw of pro-wrestling industry EVER.

1.Holds the record of drawing most major shows with 10,000+ attendance on top in one calendar year.[Broke Hogan's(1986) and Austin's(1998) record in 1999 and set a record of headlining over 100 shows with 10,000 plus people in attendance in year 2000.A box-office drawing record that is unsurpassed till date.]

2.Holds the record of main-eventing almost 17 PPVs that have got over 500k buys(again,a feat of inimitable drawing power that is unmatched by anyone in pro-wrestling history)

3.Drew the highest cable ratings during the AE.

4.Sold more merchandise than anyone active between mid 1999-2001.
Boots2Asses is offline  
post #35 of 63 (permalink) Old 03-13-2013, 01:39 AM
Acknowledged by SCOTT STEINER
 
Felpent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,124
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
 
Re: Royal Rumble Buys

Seems like they lost money on the PPV revenue, they spent more on advertising and promoting Rock vs Punk and the return wasn't profitable with only 23,000 domestic increase. Not to mention The Rock is going to take a big chunk of it as his payday. Dave Meltzer says the exact same happened with Survivor series 2011.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Clique View Post
Damn, Orton/Hardy did big business that year.
It wasn't really Orton/hardy, Hardy even at his peak didn't move PPV numbers, he was a tremendous merchandise draw however. The main angle built around rumble was the most promoted and heavily pushed for the event, and ofcourse the new york market usually helps going in.

Felpent is offline  
post #36 of 63 (permalink) Old 03-13-2013, 10:20 AM
Humbled
 
Yosihait's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Israel
Posts: 503
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
 
Re: Royal Rumble Buys

The problem with building new stars is not the Rock. But I'll tell you the problem:

Vince pushes guys non-stop from April until January. And then suddenly he gets cold feet.

He wouldn't take any risk.
Yosihait is offline  
post #37 of 63 (permalink) Old 03-13-2013, 11:05 AM
✯✯✯ Kissing Under the Mistletoe ✯✯✯
 
Clique's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Irving, TX by way of Chicago, IL
Posts: 18,633
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: Royal Rumble Buys

Quote:
Originally Posted by Felpent View Post

It wasn't really Orton/hardy, Hardy even at his peak didn't move PPV numbers, he was a tremendous merchandise draw however. The main angle built around rumble was the most promoted and heavily pushed for the event, and ofcourse the new york market usually helps going in.
I don't remember the Royal Rumble match getting as heavily promoted as Orton/Hardy for the WWE Championship. You do have a point with the New York market and promotion there playing a role, but I'm inclined to think Orton/Hardy was a factor too. That program received a substantial amount of build with Jeff's stunts on Randy and the pre-match hype videos were well done.


THIS CHRISTMAS
ALL I'M REALLY ASKING FOR IS YOU


Last edited by Clique; 03-13-2013 at 11:18 AM.
Clique is offline  
post #38 of 63 (permalink) Old 03-13-2013, 11:14 AM
AND YOU SHINE MY SHOES IF I WANT YOU TO
 
xdoomsayerx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Best in the world: CHICAGO
Posts: 9,505
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by WrestlingforEverII View Post
Blaming The Rock for WWE's booking faults they make year round is fucking stupid. Having a guy like Rock on the show is helping them in exposure. All of the part timers bring the eyes, bring the ratings, bring the big time feel. This is when booking is supposed to capitalize on that and book and write interesting angles and characters to build around that. They are letting all that slip away. They fail to do that because they are on crack or something. Its not Rock's fault they cant book for shit. And as others have said the guy is not around enough to truly be taking or hogging the spot from anyone. Stop with the bullshit. They had 7 years without the guy, the pretty much failed. Not his fault. With or without part timers they still cant get shit right and 2010 is a good example of this.

Only thing that is a cancer is your post


Do you work for wwe? No. So him helping ratings shouldn't effect you one fucking bit. It seems all you care about is mainstream exposure which is idiotic with rock burying talent and cutting god awful promos. The buys/ratings don't effect you one bit so have a better excuse than that bs.

Top 10 all time favorites:

Stone Cold Steve Austin
The Undertaker
Shawn Michaels
Chris Jericho
Brock Lesnar
Kurt Angle
HHH
Edge
CM Punk
Kane (98-04)
xdoomsayerx is offline  
post #39 of 63 (permalink) Old 03-13-2013, 01:05 PM
Cutting a shoot promo to get over
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 7,326
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: Royal Rumble Buys

Quote:
Originally Posted by xdoomsayerx View Post
Do you work for wwe? No. So him helping ratings shouldn't effect you one fucking bit. It seems all you care about is mainstream exposure which is idiotic with rock burying talent and cutting god awful promos. The buys/ratings don't effect you one bit so have a better excuse than that bs.
First off, this is not an excuse.

2nd off did you even read my damn post?

How does my post indicate that ALL I care about is mainstream exposure. All I did was state the obvious for The Rock and any part timer.

What I posted is the benefit of having them around, and it is a fact that WWE isn't capitalizing on that exposure, and its sad. Thats not all I care about though so you can fuck off with that. Im glad that these older guys bring eyes to the WWE so that other full time guys get the chance to have more people see them work. Im not the only one who shares this view as guys like Dolph Ziggler, Miz and so on have stated this. I dont need to work in the company to care and appreciate the good that having Rock on the show does.

I can still be a fan and talk about and look at things from a wider perspective. Especially if I see positives for it. Its no different from you talking about how Rock needs to put guys over, hes burying talent, because its "good for business." You are just negative and irrational about it

As a fan, I can care about how many people get to see some of the full time guys work. As a fan, I can care about seeing CM Punk be put on a grand stage and work in a high profile championship feud with a big star like Rock. Same For Cena/Rock. Rock working with them gave us high profile feuds. Feuds we do not get often.

As a fan, I can enjoy seeing guys like Rhodes Scholars or Daniel Bryan cut back and forth promos with Rock.

Those are easily examples and positives of having Rock and it has nothing to do with ratings & buys.

The problem is like I said WWE, not The Rock are not putting on any interesting and compelling angles for these guys to work around with the added benefit of having Rock on their show.

You're a silly for blaming The Rock for WWE's booking decisions. Especially ones they make year round and have been making long before he was in the company again.

The guy hasnt buried any talent and the so called bad promos to you is entirely subjective.

You are also sounding silly for using the "buried" term when it has no merit in this situation.

Last edited by WrestlingforEverII; 03-13-2013 at 01:08 PM.
WrestlingforEverII is offline  
post #40 of 63 (permalink) Old 03-13-2013, 01:09 PM
Wheel Man for SCOTT STEINER
 
ROGERTHAT21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 3,239
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: Royal Rumble Buys

Quote:
Originally Posted by WrestlingforEverII View Post
First off, this is not an excuse.

2nd off did you even read my damn post?

How does my post indicate that ALL I care about is mainstream exposure. All I did was state the obvious for The Rock and any part timer.

What I posted is the benefit of having them around, and it is a fact that WWE isn't capitalizing on that exposure, and its sad. Thats not all I care about though so you can fuck off with that. Im glad that these older guys bring eyes to the WWE so that other full time guys get the chance to have more people see them work. Im not the only one who shares this view as guys like Dolph Ziggler, Miz and so on have stated this. I dont need to work in the company to care and appreciate the good that having Rock on the show does.

I can still be a fan and talk about and look at things from a wider perspective. Especially if I see positives for it. Its no different from you talking about how Rock needs to put guys over, hes burying talent, because its "good for business." You are just negative and irrational about it

As a fan, I can care about how many people get to see some of the full time guys work. As a fan, I can care about seeing CM Punk be put on a grand stage and work in a high profile championship feud with a big star like Rock. Same For Cena/Rock. Rock working with them gave us high profile feuds. Feuds we do not get often.

As a fan, I can enjoy seeing guys like Rhodes Scholars or Daniel Bryan cut back and forth promos with Rock.

Those are easily examples and positives of having Rock and it has nothing to do with ratings & buys.

The problem is like I said WWE, not The Rock are not putting on any interesting and compelling angles for these guys to work around with the added benefit of having Rock on their show.

You're a silly for blaming The Rock for WWE's booking decisions. Especially ones they make year round and have been making long before he was in the company again.

The guy hasnt buried any talent and the so called bad promos to you is entirely subjective.

You are also sounding silly for using the "buried" term when it has no merit in this situation.
Amen, especially the bold underlined part.


Sig Credit: Bubba-3D
ROGERTHAT21 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome