WrestleMania 29 doesn't need to have HHH booked on the card - Page 3 - Wrestling Forum : WWE, TNA, Debate League, Wrestling Videos, Women of Wrestling Forums
Reply

Old 02-01-2013, 07:54 PM   #21 (permalink)
Here he comes...
 
Endors Toi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Leeds, England
Posts: 935
Endors Toi needs to take rep more seriousEndors Toi needs to take rep more seriousEndors Toi needs to take rep more seriousEndors Toi needs to take rep more seriousEndors Toi needs to take rep more seriousEndors Toi needs to take rep more seriousEndors Toi needs to take rep more serious
Default Re: WrestleMania 29 doesn't need to have HHH booked on the card

I would like to see Trips at Mania but not against Lesnar.
__________________
Endors Toi is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 02-01-2013, 10:38 PM   #22 (permalink)
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
LovelyElle890's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: California
Posts: 704
LovelyElle890 needs to make some friendsLovelyElle890 needs to make some friendsLovelyElle890 needs to make some friendsLovelyElle890 needs to make some friendsLovelyElle890 needs to make some friendsLovelyElle890 needs to make some friendsLovelyElle890 needs to make some friendsLovelyElle890 needs to make some friendsLovelyElle890 needs to make some friends
Default Re: WrestleMania 29 doesn't need to have HHH booked on the card

I find it hilarious that people are blasting HHH for being on the card but Lesnar, Taker, and Rock have to be on the card. And not only that, they have to wrestle the most high profile matches possible between them. But Triple H is taking a young guy's spot and not putting over talent. God knows that wrestling Rock, Lesnar, and Taker at Wrestlemania won't ever put a young person over.

The truth is that they should all be on the card, except they should each be wrestling a PG Era star and putting them over. You don't need to have a top heavy card for Wrestlemania. It is actually better to have a well rounded show that entertains from start to finish. People don't like wasting their money anymore. If I am going to pay 65 dollars for an event, I better get more than one match out of it. Especially, since you have been failing to deliver quality for the past couple of years or so.
__________________
LovelyElle890 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2013, 11:12 PM   #23 (permalink)
Learning to break kayfabe
 
LucasTheMenace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NY
Posts: 244
LucasTheMenace LucasTheMenace
Default Re: WrestleMania 29 doesn't need to have HHH booked on the card

Quote:
Originally Posted by LovelyElle890 View Post
I find it hilarious that people are blasting HHH for being on the card but Lesnar, Taker, and Rock have to be on the card. And not only that, they have to wrestle the most high profile matches possible between them. But Triple H is taking a young guy's spot and not putting over talent. God knows that wrestling Rock, Lesnar, and Taker at Wrestlemania won't ever put a young person over.

The truth is that they should all be on the card, except they should each be wrestling a PG Era star and putting them over. You don't need to have a top heavy card for Wrestlemania. It is actually better to have a well rounded show that entertains from start to finish. People don't like wasting their money anymore. If I am going to pay 65 dollars for an event, I better get more than one match out of it. Especially, since you have been failing to deliver quality for the past couple of years or so.
It's mainly a blast if he faces Brock Lesnar, in case you haven't been reading. The Rock vs John Cena match, although many don't want to see again, at least serves a purpose and can be understood business wise. But both HHH and Brock Lesnar gain nothing from this match because both leave after WM, there's nothing on the line, just 2 men fighting for the same reason they did at SummerSlam. Undertaker has something to fight for, the streak...another seller for 'Mania.
LucasTheMenace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2013, 11:14 PM   #24 (permalink)
Learning to break kayfabe
 
LucasTheMenace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NY
Posts: 244
LucasTheMenace LucasTheMenace
Default Re: WrestleMania 29 doesn't need to have HHH booked on the card

Quote:
Originally Posted by rohisawesome34 View Post
i disagree it doesnt matter if they dissapear after mania theyre still huge stars that draw money at the biggest show of the year jeez if you and all these other moronic smarks were running mania then it would be a complete disaster but thank god vince and the creative team dont listen to the internet. it needs to happen hhh vs lesnar 2 it makes sense and the rematch doesnt need to happen at a small ppv it needs to happen at wrestlemania 29 to make it even bigger so im all for it to happen and it will be awesome period and taker needs to be on the card too well i hope he is anyway!
Lol, as if Cena vs The Rock doesn't draw enough money in itself? Hence why Lesnar/HHH part 2 isn't needed, it's not like people care about HHH as much as they do with Rocky or Cena anymore.
LucasTheMenace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2013, 12:04 AM   #25 (permalink)
Humbled
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 347
rohisawesome34
Default Re: WrestleMania 29 doesn't need to have HHH booked on the card

Quote:
Originally Posted by LucasTheMenace View Post
Lol, as if Cena vs The Rock doesn't draw enough money in itself? Hence why Lesnar/HHH part 2 isn't needed, it's not like people care about HHH as much as they do with Rocky or Cena anymore.
im actually really happy theyre having this rematch at wrestlemania 29 i dont think wwe wants to wait until summerslam or another ppv to do this match lesnar will probably face orton at summerslam this year if i had to guess and who knows hhh might not even wrestle at wrestlemania 30 next year so mania 29 is perfect to do this match and i know theyll go all out. rematches are always the best look at stone cold vs rock 2 at wrestlemania 17 compared to 15, 17 blew it away rematches always usually are the best the 1st time they hold back somewhat the 2nd time they go all out which is what i see happening with lesnar vs hhh. i say do a street fight or hell in a cell but thats just me!
rohisawesome34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2013, 12:14 AM   #26 (permalink)
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
LovelyElle890's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: California
Posts: 704
LovelyElle890 needs to make some friendsLovelyElle890 needs to make some friendsLovelyElle890 needs to make some friendsLovelyElle890 needs to make some friendsLovelyElle890 needs to make some friendsLovelyElle890 needs to make some friendsLovelyElle890 needs to make some friendsLovelyElle890 needs to make some friendsLovelyElle890 needs to make some friends
Default Re: WrestleMania 29 doesn't need to have HHH booked on the card

Quote:
Originally Posted by LucasTheMenace View Post
It's mainly a blast if he faces Brock Lesnar, in case you haven't been reading. The Rock vs John Cena match, although many don't want to see again, at least serves a purpose and can be understood business wise. But both HHH and Brock Lesnar gain nothing from this match because both leave after WM, there's nothing on the line, just 2 men fighting for the same reason they did at SummerSlam. Undertaker has something to fight for, the streak...another seller for 'Mania.
We both know that the Undertaker won't be showing up after Wrestlemania either. Triple H has a higher chance of showing up after Wrestlemania than the Undertaker does. The Rock vs Cena match serves no purpose either. Once in a Lifetime. John Cena doesn't need his win back. He lost nothing in defeat. Did he change his character? No. Did he walk around depressed for weeks on end? No. Did he turn heel because it meant everything to him? Nope. In fact, if they have Cena go over Rock, without turning heel, it might cripple this company. The Lesnar/HHH storyline is the only one that makes since because The Shield, who were hired by Paul Heyman, are running wild within the WWE and Brock Lesnar just attacked Vince. Triple H is both the COO and the son-in-law of Vince Mcmahon, surely we would have to believe that he would not ignore these two actions since they both pertain to him.

Look I know you don't want to see the match, I don't really care either way. But I am not going to sit here and pretend that Triple H's ego is any bigger than the people listed above. If they truly were as humble as you make them out to be, then they would be putting over new stars at Mania instead of trying to make big matches.
__________________
LovelyElle890 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums
Copyright (C) Verticalscope Inc Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
Powered by vBulletin Copyright 2000-2009 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007, PixelFX Studios