Originally Posted by Jeff Hardy Hater
Yes Vince, they've booked him like such a midcarder with his one clean loss out of probably 150 matches.
Yeah, losing to a Laurantitis, that made him look really strong. Or how about being pinned clean by Punk. Or losing to Ziggler. Or losing to Rock.
That's 4 loses in one year. Austin probably never had 4 loses in one year, same with Hogan. It's not that he's booked like a midcarder, it's just that he loses much more than he should be when he's the top face of the company.
Originally Posted by shought321
No he hasn't he has main evented multiple ppvs despite not being champion, and been as terrible as ever. They don't need to book him any stronger because he is unequivocally the face of the company. A win over Rock does nothing for Cena in the long run, it just gives the WWE an excuse to promote Cena as in the same bracket as Austin/Rock/Hogan, which will be rejected by everyone but them.
Yeah, people may reject the idea of Cena in the same bracket as Hogan/Austin/Rock. But, it makes all the sense in the world for WWE to do that. He's been the top face for almost 9 years strong. That's enough credibility for him to be in the same bracket as Hogan, Austin and Rock.
A win over The Rock does nothing for Cena in the long run? The Rock is the biggest star he will ever face besides Taker at Mania. They will book Cena over Rock at WrestleMania 29, than use that as a jumpstart to Cena/Taker at WM 30.
Oh, and The Rock was a huge star in the late 90's and early 2000's. Why did he have to beat Hogan and Austin two years in a row? That's how you put over someone. Their going to put Cena over Rock and move on from the "Rock is God" stuff and we'll move back to reality.