Originally Posted by JAROTO
Being honest Cena should have beaten the Rock last year at WM28. It was the WWE's wish to have the Miami crowd leave happy, but at the end of the day it didn't make sense.
I agree. Even though is makes sense to have Rock win his first match back in what? 8 years. It still didn't make sense to have Cena loss. Now their doing rematch and people are acting like it's so predictable, when last year they swerved everyone with Rock going over. This year though, Cena has to win. There is no way, no how that they should have their top face job to a guy two years in a row. Much less 3 years in a row. Cena is still the top face of the company the last time I checked, so if they don't put Cena over Rook I have NO CLUE what their doing with Cena.
Seriously, there's going to come a point when Rock is going to have to take a pin, right? He has to lose eventually, they can't have him win every single match. He lose to Cena this year, than will face (and beat) Lesnar next year. Than he'll either leave, or work WM 31. Either or, it wouldn't make sense in the slightest for WWE to put The Rock over Cena. Again. Even though I didn't agree with Rock going over Cena the first time, it made some sense of the fact that they didn't want to job Rock out right away.
If Cena doesn't win, than I have no clue what WWE is doing with their top face. Cena going over The Rock makes all the sense in the world. One, it's adds to Cena's legacy. Two, it puts him over huge and adds potential fuel for a storyline with Taker at WrestleMania 30. He's beaten them all, h's done it all. But there's one thing he hasn't done yet, and that's take on The Undertaker at WrestleMania. It writes itself.