[Fightme]

I doubt that will happen; he's their poster boy. I know he didn't have an especially great 2012 but they won't have him losing twice to The Rock at Wrestlemania. They know that Rock won't be around for much longer (he isn't even around much at the moment as their Champion) and they know how much money Cena makes them.

In my eyes, it can only go down one of two ways. Either the Undertaker returns at Elimination Chamber, causing CM Punk to lose to The Rock in his rematch. From there that causes The Rock to move into a rematch against John Cena at Wrestlemania, and for Punk to have his shot at the Undertaker's streak. I think it may be the Undertaker's last WM, in which he will beat Punk. Cena will beat Rock and get back the WWE Championship.

If it turns out that the Undertaker isn't returning, and will miss Wrestlemania (it's unlikely they need him in all honesty), then I think that will lead to a last minute triple threat match for the WWE Championship, including Rock, Cena and Punk, with Punk walking out with the title.

And on another note, I think The Big Show will beat Alberto Del Rio for the World Heavyweight Championship at Elimination Chamber. That will be nicely set-up for Chris Jericho to win the Elimination Chamber match. He will beat The Big Show for the title at Wrestlemania after being beaten up for the majority of their 10 minute match. His music will cut out, Dolph Ziggler's will start - he will finally, successfully cash in his Money in the Bank briefcase and win the title.

[Elijah89]

Originally Posted by KingOfKings

NAH. I know Rock has Austin as his main foil (well, the other way around) , but in this generation they're going to make The Rock seem as if he's been Cena's ultimate rival once Cena-Rock have their trilogy that ends at Wrestlemania XXX.

After tomorrow night I just can't wait for Mania to come TBH, as the build is going to be pretty bad.

I'm the only John Cena fan on this forum and even I would be pissed if Cena/Taker does not headline Mania 30. Even if Cena lost again this year, a match at Mania 30 would piss me off. I completely understand Rock winning last year in order for Cena to get his rematch because it was a feud in which a one and done match would not have been ideal unless Rock was going back to Hollywood permanently but he didn't. This year works but it should also be the end of the feud. Rock can face Lesnar and Cena can face Taker next year. The only part time guy who should be headlining the 30's (WM 31-39) is John Cena (he'll be a special attraction winding down his career by then). As for now, keep guys like Bryan, Ziggler, Barrett, Sheamus, Ryback, Cesaro, etc.. away from these guys. They're still being built up. Even though a Sheamus/Lesnar does sound pretty badass. Sheamus seems like a guy who can take a beating from Lesnar.

[Elijah89]

Originally Posted by Fightme

I very much doubt it. One of two things could happen. Rock will retain his title at Elimination Chamber.

If CM Punk doesn't take on the Undertaker at Wrestlemania, he'll be involved in a triple threat for the WWE Championship against The Rock and John Cena - with Punk walking out with the title.

That would be a shocker. What would happen next in your opinion? Another Cena/Punk program where Cena wins the title this time? Besides The Rock, I don't see Punk losing the title to anyone else but Cena.

[Ithil]

Vince does not care what the crowd does, anymore. He wants Cena as the ultimate champion, he's going to be.

[CamillePunk]

You think The Rock is going to wrestle at Extreme Rules? Yeah okay lol. He's gone after WM. Hopefully for good.

[GillbergReturns]

[quote=Elijah89;14086874]

Originally Posted by GillbergReturns

Taker retiring undefeated does not seem like something Mcmahon would. It's just not Vince like. You can't make anymore money off the streak after Taker retires anyway, so just end it. Are you guys gonna keep getting excited every time he wins at Wrestlemania because it is getting tired now.

You guys can't deny that a Taker loss is bigger than another win at this point. Which sounds more fun to talk about: "Man, that is so cool that Taker went 23-0 at WM" "Man, were you there when Taker finally lost at Wrestlemania?". I don't know why I just asked that question on Wrestlingforum.com when I know damn well what the answer is gonna be. But maybe there is at least one person......

I think there's problems with Taker losing at WM too. His character deserves to ride off in the sunset. His whole legacy is rising from dead. It's a hard sell to sell a rematch without the streak and a predictable ending.

Since Taker was never given the company and was always overlooked in the championship scene the streak is his defining legacy. I absolutely could see Vince wanting him to retire with it.

I don't know when Taker is planning on calling it quits but I would absolutely take 23-0 with victories over Lesnar and Rock opposed to losing to Cena at WM 30. I'm not a Cena hater either.

[The Beast Incarnate]

Wrestlemania XXX will be Rock-Cena III and Taker-Brock with the streak on the line, with Punk winning the Royal Rumble and getting third billing in a WWE Championship match against Sheamus who will probably be WWE Champion by then anyways.

[The Pied Piper]

Originally Posted by KingOfKings

Wrestlemania XXX will be Rock-Cena III and Taker-Brock with the streak on the line, with Punk winning the Royal Rumble and getting third billing in a WWE Championship match against Sheamus who will probably be WWE Champion by then anyways.

Taker vs Brock? Not a bad idea, unless WWE signs Sting.

[DesolationRow]

Originally Posted by KingOfKings

Wrestlemania XXX will be Rock-Cena III and Taker-Brock with the streak on the line, with Punk winning the Royal Rumble and getting third billing in a WWE Championship match against Sheamus who will probably be WWE Champion by then anyways.

At this point, I'd say this is about as good a prediction for that Wrestlemania as any.

[Elijah89]

[quote=GillbergReturns;14099921]

Originally Posted by Elijah89

I think there's problems with Taker losing at WM too. His character deserves to ride off in the sunset. His whole legacy is rising from dead. It's a hard sell to sell a rematch without the streak and a predictable ending.

Since Taker was never given the company and was always overlooked in the championship scene the streak is his defining legacy. I absolutely could see Vince wanting him to retire with it.

I don't know when Taker is planning on calling it quits but I would absolutely take 23-0 with victories over Lesnar and Rock opposed to losing to Cena at WM 30. I'm not a Cena hater either.

The Undertaker has more than just the streak. The fact that people feel that his legacy will be tarnished because of a single loss is baffling. I can see Vince putting business before sympathy and having Taker lay down for somebody. I guess I am just different. Taker is going to retire a very rich man with a great legacy regardless of an outcome of a wrestling match. I'm pretty certain he would put business ahead of sympathy as well.

I hate using wrestlers real names, but I don't see Mark Calloway wanting to retire with his streak intact. I can't see us as wrestling fans ever moving on to future Mania legacies if the streak never ended. You guys can't deny that Taker losing would be very historic. Why would you not want to see a moment like that? It's cool to see some of you "smarks" show your inner "markdom" that you had during your childhoods though.