Is WrestleMania this obvious? - Page 5 - Wrestling Forum : WWE, TNA, ROH, Wrestling Videos, Women of Wrestling Forums
Reply

Old 01-28-2013, 11:07 PM   #41 (permalink)
Acknowledged by SCOTT STEINER
 
Gene_Wilder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 1,258
Gene_Wilder 251 - 500Gene_Wilder 251 - 500Gene_Wilder 251 - 500Gene_Wilder 251 - 500
Default Re: Is WrestleMania this obvious?

just let the stories run their course, its about the journey not the destination. But i'll throw you a bone, bitch about Cena as much as you want. Sick of that fucking guy.
__________________

Bring Wrestlemania 32 to St. Louis!!

Smackdown: If WWE can choose when to air it, I can choose when to watch it. Make Smackdown Live on Thursdays

Cut back to 6 PPVs!! Move Survivor Series, The Royal Rumble, and Summer Slam to Stadiums!!!

I predicted the HHH takeover first, not bboy, ME!

if you got a problem with me, you can complain here. otherwise keep your hot garbage out of my threads

Alex, Rogerthat21, McLovin it, HotDiggity11 TomasThunder619 Mithro Sho'nuff and Liberty_JAC are ALLLL Punk Ass Bitches!!

Keep WWE A M E R I C A N no more Raws/Smackdowns/PPVs in the UK
Gene_Wilder is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 01-28-2013, 11:12 PM   #42 (permalink)
Learning to break kayfabe
 
New Jersey Iced J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Jersey
Posts: 5
New Jersey Iced J 50 - 100
Default Re: The E' has options here

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dest Fade View Post
I know that the scenarios I am about to say will most likely get shot down. But after watching raw, we instantly thought Brock/HHH II . Two rematches of last year in a row? I don't think so. This is Wrestlemania 29, not Wrestlemania 28 part 2. I had this idea play in my mind where it would be

Brock and The Shield w/ Heyman (as manager) vs. HHH, Shawn Michaels, Billy Gunn and Road Dogg. w/ Mr.Mcmahon (as manager)

I personally think that would get a lot more people into the match, and there would be some pretty big pops.

Also, if they could find someone else to wrestle on Brock's team, (most likely not CM punk or Brad Maddox) then they could put X-PAC in the match too.

Honestly, I believe all of the pieces are there, and I hope WWE considers this.

I actually thought of this and took it a step further to include Punk with Team Heyman and X-Pac on Team Vince (setting up DX) in a traditional Survivor Series match at Mania. Would really shake things up. But I understand you lose the potential Punk-Taker bout.
__________________
The Best there is, the Best there was and the Best there ever will be!
New Jersey Iced J is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2013, 11:20 PM   #43 (permalink)
Yelled at by SCOTT STEINER
 
itsmadness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,761
itsmadness 29001 - 29500itsmadness 29001 - 29500itsmadness 29001 - 29500itsmadness 29001 - 29500itsmadness 29001 - 29500itsmadness 29001 - 29500itsmadness 29001 - 29500itsmadness 29001 - 29500itsmadness 29001 - 29500itsmadness 29001 - 29500itsmadness 29001 - 29500
Default Re: Is WrestleMania this obvious?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheAverageGuy View Post
Less obvious booking would be...

HHH obviously being mad at Bork, so he wants to retaliate, but HHH feels like his days are over and remembers how Bork beat him up good. So, HHH instead brings in Taker who he feels can woop lesnars ass, and the rest just writes itself. Bork/Taker have good history
You seriously think HHH is going to let Taker get a win over bork instead of himself?

itsmadness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2013, 11:59 PM   #44 (permalink)
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
THErealLEGACY's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: boston
Posts: 890
THErealLEGACY 501 - 1000THErealLEGACY 501 - 1000THErealLEGACY 501 - 1000THErealLEGACY 501 - 1000THErealLEGACY 501 - 1000THErealLEGACY 501 - 1000THErealLEGACY 501 - 1000
Default Re: Is WrestleMania this obvious?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flocka Street Lottery View Post
Yeah, just like Taker vs HHH was horrendous right? Every single year you group of kids come out and say that Taker shouldn't be in a match at mania anymore because he is too old, he's bad in the ring now, out of shape, etc....Then every single year Taker has match of the night and match of the year candidate type matches. Get over yourselves, he can go once a year for another 2-3 years at the very least, and guess what, he'll still put on a better match than your favorite wrestler can bud.
Hmm. You seemed to jump the gun a little bit. The guy you quoted never came out and said Undertaker shouldn't wrestle anymore, that he's bad in the ring or even out of shape. maybe he was just stating it would be horrendous to match him up with Sheamus, which I agree with..

Also it would be a little ironic if Taker was his favorite wrestler.

EDIT: Taker is one of my favorites and I hope he keeps wrestling.
__________________


Credit: The Fourth Wall

"Life is not a spectator sport. If you're going to spend your whole life in the grandstand just watching what goes on, in my opinion you're wasting your life."
THErealLEGACY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2013, 04:50 AM   #45 (permalink)
Yelled at by SCOTT STEINER
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,512
redban 1001 - 1500redban 1001 - 1500redban 1001 - 1500redban 1001 - 1500redban 1001 - 1500redban 1001 - 1500redban 1001 - 1500redban 1001 - 1500
Default Wrestlemania 29 Slogan: "Let's Return the Favor."

Unless we get a massive swerve, we are going to get:
  1. John Cena defeats The Rock (c.)
  2. HHH (w/ McMahon) defeats Brock Lesnar

The rationale is this:
  1. The Rock beat John Cena @ 'Mania 28. Thus, Rock must return the favor and lose to Cena at 'Mania 29.
  2. Brock Lesnar beat HHH @ Summerslam 2012. Thus, Lesnar must return the favor and lose to HHH @ 'Mania 29.

What kind of nonsense is this!

Why can't there be 1 match that settles a feud. Rock beat Cena last year. That's it; end the rivalry. Rock > Cena. Move on to something else. Brock beat HHH at Summerslam. Lesnar > HHH. Move on!

Imagine if Wrestlemania 4 had Andre beating Hogan in a similar return-the-favor-match. How diluted and weakened would their Wrestlemania 3 match become?

Or what if Hogan at Wrestlemania 7 defeated Warrior in a return-the-favor-match. Their Wrestlemania 6 match loses its luster.

Or what if Hogan had beaten Rock at Wrestlemania 19 to get a return-the-favor-match.

STOP RETURNING THE FAVOR!
redban is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2013, 05:07 AM   #46 (permalink)
Learning to break kayfabe
 
GNR4LIFE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Sydney
Posts: 213
GNR4LIFE 101 - 250GNR4LIFE 101 - 250
Default Re: Wrestlemania 29 Slogan: "Let's Return the Favor."

I'm still clinging on to hope that something happens at EC that could result in giving us Rock/Brock or Taker/Brock and a Cena heel turn, but at this point i think having a 3 way with Pink and Rachel MacAdams is more realistic
GNR4LIFE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2013, 05:55 AM   #47 (permalink)
Learning to break kayfabe
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Oldham, England
Posts: 82
tony2074 50 - 100
Default

Taker's streak is a massive selling point these days. He'll have a match.

The thing that scares me is Cena's "Year of redemption". He's gonna be more unbeatable, more in our faces and more annoying. My theory is he could feasibly go unbeaten all year, leading to a match with Taker at WM 30.


Sent from Verticalsports.com Free App
tony2074 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2013, 09:24 AM   #48 (permalink)
Chief Operating Officer and World Heavyweight Champion BRRRRROCKKKK LESSSSSNARRR
 
KING.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 9,243
KING. 14001 - 14500KING. 14001 - 14500KING. 14001 - 14500KING. 14001 - 14500KING. 14001 - 14500KING. 14001 - 14500KING. 14001 - 14500KING. 14001 - 14500KING. 14001 - 14500KING. 14001 - 14500KING. 14001 - 14500
Default Re: Wrestlemania 29 Slogan: "Let's Return the Favor."

Quote:
Originally Posted by redban View Post
Why can't there be 1 match that settles a feud.
This is your answer.

__________________
KING. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2013, 09:27 AM   #49 (permalink)
BELIEVE
 
Cloverleaf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: ENGLAND
Posts: 2,662
Cloverleaf 4001 - 4500Cloverleaf 4001 - 4500Cloverleaf 4001 - 4500Cloverleaf 4001 - 4500Cloverleaf 4001 - 4500Cloverleaf 4001 - 4500Cloverleaf 4001 - 4500Cloverleaf 4001 - 4500Cloverleaf 4001 - 4500Cloverleaf 4001 - 4500Cloverleaf 4001 - 4500
Default Re: Wrestlemania 29 Slogan: "Let's Return the Favor."

Quote:
Originally Posted by redban View Post
Unless we get a massive swerve, we are going to get:
  1. John Cena defeats The Rock (c.)
  2. HHH (w/ McMahon) defeats Brock Lesnar

The rationale is this:
  1. The Rock beat John Cena @ 'Mania 28. Thus, Rock must return the favor and lose to Cena at 'Mania 29.
  2. Brock Lesnar beat HHH @ Summerslam 2012. Thus, Lesnar must return the favor and lose to HHH @ 'Mania 29.

What kind of nonsense is this!

Why can't there be 1 match that settles a feud. Rock beat Cena last year. That's it; end the rivalry. Rock > Cena. Move on to something else. Brock beat HHH at Summerslam. Lesnar > HHH. Move on!

Imagine if Wrestlemania 4 had Andre beating Hogan in a similar return-the-favor-match. How diluted and weakened would their Wrestlemania 3 match become?

Or what if Hogan at Wrestlemania 7 defeated Warrior in a return-the-favor-match. Their Wrestlemania 6 match loses its luster.

Or what if Hogan had beaten Rock at Wrestlemania 19 to get a return-the-favor-match.

STOP RETURNING THE FAVOR!
It's funny, cause Hogan and Andre did fight at Wrestlemania 3...but it was a draw.

I see you point, I too, am against those matches listed above. But, I'll probs really enjoy them when they happen.

We've seen Punk vs Taker before. Do we want to see that again?

__________________

Last edited by Cloverleaf : 01-29-2013 at 09:28 AM. Reason: Pic added...
Cloverleaf is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2013, 02:52 PM   #50 (permalink)
Because It's The Cup
 
Cobruh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: USA~!
Posts: 1,376
Cobruh 1501 - 2000Cobruh 1501 - 2000Cobruh 1501 - 2000Cobruh 1501 - 2000Cobruh 1501 - 2000Cobruh 1501 - 2000Cobruh 1501 - 2000Cobruh 1501 - 2000Cobruh 1501 - 2000Cobruh 1501 - 2000Cobruh 1501 - 2000
Default Two year "Rematches" at WrestleMania - Annoying or not?

Wrestlemania 25 - Shawn Michaels vs. The Undertaker

Wrestlemania 26 - Shawn Michaels vs. The Undertaker

Wrestlemania 27 - Triple H vs. The Undertaker

Wrestlemania 28 - Triple H vs. The Undertaker

Wrestlemania 28 - John Cena vs. The Rock (Dubbed "once in a lifetime")

Wrestlemania 29 - John Cena vs. The Rock (?)

These double matches are really starting to piss me off. I want to see things at Wrestlemania that I haven't seen before, something unique and spectacular. These just seem like a big waste of space for me on honestly and also a waste of time. The Rock won't be here too much longer as he is getting up there in age, The Undertaker is up there in age as well, and facing two people at wrestlemania in four years? He could have battled Cena, Jericho, or anyone else to change it up but it just seems like they are doing too many "Wrestlemania Rematches"

What are your opinions on this?
Cobruh is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums
Copyright (C) Verticalscope Inc Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
Powered by vBulletin Copyright © 2000-2009 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007, PixelFX Studios