Originally Posted by just1988
Gunner's ban is only till the 15th, he'll put a new thread up then and sort all the matches in time for Elimination Chamber.
Well, there you go.
Originally Posted by TheVoiceless
The only question I have is Proc gonna keep the matches in place for EC that Gunner already set? Such as the Elimination Chamber for the Forum Title and my Match with Gimmicky?
Still, I'd like to answer your question anyways.
I looked through Gunner's mess that some may want to call a supposedly title picture for EC. At one point there was an 1on1 match booked for the Forum Title, then there were the wrong scores posted and by the end (or atlest what I figure to be the end) we have a seven (wtf?) men match for said championship. It's confusing when the card gets changed that many times and the first post actually does not include the last booked card (which you can find in post #216 no, I am not kidding).
It's completely irrelevant to book hypothetic matches for EC at this point, but yes, I would have made adjustments to the card. There are several reasons for that starting by the fact that Gunner booked things for EC, for which I just can't find any reason whatsoever. But I'll admit that I didn't care too much for his booking recently, besides the Forum Title, as I lost somewhat interest in the game, or atleast how he handled it. I'm in this since the very first event and didn't miss it once, but if you look back I used to be way more involved.
My favourite part of the game always was the creative aspect (writing promos, Dandy Family feud etc.), which imo is totally lost now because of the mathematical and formulated approach. So I stopped bothering with it.
To be honest I got quite excited over the last 24 hours, thinking I'd have a chance to revitalize said creative aspect.
Sorry, I am digressing. To answer your question: yes, I would have changed parts of the card. Don't forget I would have re-introduced the divisions. As mentioned before I would have had an elimination chamber for the Forum Championship (but not with 7 participants) and yes, you would have been in it, challenging for my title. I presumably would have based most participants on Gunner's 4 month scoring table.
Obviously Gunner and myself don't see eye to eye on most details of this game, but I do consider the 4 month table a very good idea for a start, so to speak. But imo there is much more to this game than just a plain, monthly scoring table.