Boy, I Gotta Watch My Back, Cause I'm Not Just Anybody
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Breaux Bridge, Louisiana
Posts: 3,292
Re: Reasons why ROCK/CENA II and HHH/LESNAR II may not happen at WM29
If they were smart, they'd do either Brock/Rock or Brock/Taker. Cena/Rock II will fail to even live up to last year's disappointment. I don't care if the WWE title is involved. Plus, who would want to watch two rematches with obvious outcomes, anyways. I feel that CM Punk deserves a main event match at Wrestlemania. Would much rather he keep the title til then. Brock/Rock & Cena/Punk sound more appealing than Brock/HHH II or Rock/Cena II. Hell WM 29 should look like Brock/Taker & Punk/Rock/Cena. Leave HHH off the card if he's gonna be in a rematch.
__________________ All Time Faves: The Rock(1), Chris Benoit(2), Steve Austin(3),Kurt Angle(4),Chris Jericho(5),HBK(6) Edge(7), Taker(8), Eddie Guerrero(9), Kane(10)
Re: Reasons why ROCK/CENA II and HHH/LESNAR II may not happen at WM29
Quote:
Originally Posted by GillbergReturns
People think it's going to be Rock v Cena 2 because that's what booking is telling us.
You don't honestly think WWE would let Rock win at Wrestlemania and have Cena away from the belt for 18 months unplanned right?
Triple H v Lesnar could be marketable if Floyd Mayweather is involved like Floyd hinted.
At this point I'd be shocked if the card is any different. Every single sign is pointing to those 3 Main Events.
If they were bothered about Cena going over Rock, then they would have just put him over Rock in the first place. They wouldn't have given Punk a 400 day reign, and put Rock over Cena at their most hyped show ever, and given Cena his worst ever year just to set up a rematch that Cena would win. It makes no sense. The booking right now has given no indication that Rock/Cena 2 will happen. They've had no interaction on TV (they had an off-air promo after raw 1000). The other reason I'm not expecting Rock/Cena 2 is that I'm expecting Rock/Brock. While Heyman's been good in his role, its not as if Punk really needed a mouthpiece, so I see them using Heyman in that role to link Punk to Lesnar and have Lesnar interfere at the Rumble.
As for the other two main events, again there's been nothing to point to them. Punk/Taker is something that's been pulled completely out of thin air, with absolutely no hint towards it, the same with a HHH/Lesnar rematch, not to mention that this card would do a worse buyrate than last year.
tbh this whole "Rock/Cena 2 is definitely happening" attitude that so many people have reminds me of last years mania when everyone said Cena was going over 100%, or MITB 2011, where Punk was definitely leaving and Cena was definitely going over. But in those two cases the decisions Vince made were the options that were best for business, just like he will for this Mania by using Rock/Brock. There's no way he has Brock on a one year contract and has 3 matches, against HHH and Cena, its just not good business.
Re: Reasons why ROCK/CENA II and HHH/LESNAR II may not happen at WM29
IMO i think it will be
Brock/HHH 2
Punk/Taker
Cena/Rock 2
these of course are diffrent from what I wanna see
Brock/HHH (I guess)
Cena/Taker
Punk/Rock 2 (have someone want revenge its already got a ton of pop built up)
__________________
Do I Look Like A Reasonable Man To You Boy? Or Do I Look Like A Peppermint Nightmare?!?!?! - The Hitcher
[]Not Removing Until Adrian Neville/PAC wins a Title In WWE
Re: Reasons why ROCK/CENA II and HHH/LESNAR II may not happen at WM29
Am I the only one who thinks if Brock/HHH 2 happened, Brock would go over again? There is no point in Triple H winning and I think everybody knows it.
__________________
Mark For Now: CM Punk, Daniel Bryan, Dolph Ziggler, Ryback, The Shield, Wade Barrett, Cody Rhodes, Damien Sandow, Christian Favorite Wrestlers All Time: The Rock (1A), Shawn Michaels (1B), The Undertaker, Chris Jericho, "Stone Cold" Steve Austin, "Macho Man" Randy Savage, Ric Flair, Sting, Mick Foley, Mr. Perfect, Bret Hart, Owen Hart, "Rowdy" Roddy Piper, Edge, Team Extreme, Trish Stratus
Re: Reasons why ROCK/CENA II and HHH/LESNAR II may not happen at WM29
A wrestlemania with both rock/cena 2 and Lesnar/HHH 2 sounds awful and I will be extremely disappointed if it happens since this is probably the only WM that I will attend in my whole life .
Re: Reasons why ROCK/CENA II and HHH/LESNAR II may not happen at WM29
If they go with the rematches, then I really can't see them even reaching a million buys, never mind matching last year. Taker/Cena is the only way they're matching last year.
Re: Reasons why ROCK/CENA II and HHH/LESNAR II may not happen at WM29
Remember when HHH was alone in the ring at Summerslam? The smarks shit all over him, he must be aware if he beats Brock the NY crowds will do the same. I don't mind that match if Brock resigns and wins.
Re: Reasons why ROCK/CENA II and HHH/LESNAR II may not happen at WM29
We can only guess as to what matches will take place, but after seeing HHH and Lesnar, you can't tell me that they weren't building off that match unless that's the story they wanted to tell. The match wasn't terrible, but it certain wasn't good enough to pay for another sample. It was literally a NO DQ match, and I kept waiting for the pain. It never showed. That's the only reason I can even think of them doing it again; to complete the story with a Triple H win in a hard fought battle.
As far as Rock and Cena? I'll put it like this...Suppose Rock goes over and beats Punk. Besides Lesnar (who might be leaving after WM), what is the biggest match that could be made? The options become limited if your trying to get people to you know..BUY THE SHOW! I'm sure a lot of people would love to see Rock vs Sheamus, or Orton, but if it isn't Taker or Lesnar, it's just a waste of money. Like him or not, People pay to see Cena, and those who rooted for Cena last yr, will cheer even harder to see him beat the one guy he has never beaten. Do I want to see it? FUCK NO, but it's highly possible. There's no denying that.