Reasons why ROCK/CENA II and HHH/LESNAR II may not happen at WM29 - Page 2 - Wrestling Forum : WWE, TNA, ROH, Wrestling Videos, Women of Wrestling Forums
Reply

Old 01-17-2013, 08:02 PM   #11 (permalink)
Boy, I Gotta Watch My Back, Cause I'm Not Just Anybody
 
Queen Akasha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Breaux Bridge, Louisiana
Posts: 3,292
Queen Akasha 1501 - 2000Queen Akasha 1501 - 2000Queen Akasha 1501 - 2000Queen Akasha 1501 - 2000Queen Akasha 1501 - 2000Queen Akasha 1501 - 2000Queen Akasha 1501 - 2000Queen Akasha 1501 - 2000Queen Akasha 1501 - 2000Queen Akasha 1501 - 2000Queen Akasha 1501 - 2000
Default Re: Reasons why ROCK/CENA II and HHH/LESNAR II may not happen at WM29

If they were smart, they'd do either Brock/Rock or Brock/Taker. Cena/Rock II will fail to even live up to last year's disappointment. I don't care if the WWE title is involved. Plus, who would want to watch two rematches with obvious outcomes, anyways. I feel that CM Punk deserves a main event match at Wrestlemania. Would much rather he keep the title til then. Brock/Rock & Cena/Punk sound more appealing than Brock/HHH II or Rock/Cena II. Hell WM 29 should look like Brock/Taker & Punk/Rock/Cena. Leave HHH off the card if he's gonna be in a rematch.
__________________
All Time Faves: The Rock(1), Chris Benoit(2), Steve Austin(3),Kurt Angle(4),Chris Jericho(5),HBK(6) Edge(7), Taker(8), Eddie Guerrero(9), Kane(10)
Queen Akasha is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 01-17-2013, 08:14 PM   #12 (permalink)
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 928
jm99 251 - 500jm99 251 - 500jm99 251 - 500jm99 251 - 500jm99 251 - 500
Default Re: Reasons why ROCK/CENA II and HHH/LESNAR II may not happen at WM29

Quote:
Originally Posted by GillbergReturns View Post
People think it's going to be Rock v Cena 2 because that's what booking is telling us.

You don't honestly think WWE would let Rock win at Wrestlemania and have Cena away from the belt for 18 months unplanned right?

Triple H v Lesnar could be marketable if Floyd Mayweather is involved like Floyd hinted.

At this point I'd be shocked if the card is any different. Every single sign is pointing to those 3 Main Events.
If they were bothered about Cena going over Rock, then they would have just put him over Rock in the first place. They wouldn't have given Punk a 400 day reign, and put Rock over Cena at their most hyped show ever, and given Cena his worst ever year just to set up a rematch that Cena would win. It makes no sense. The booking right now has given no indication that Rock/Cena 2 will happen. They've had no interaction on TV (they had an off-air promo after raw 1000). The other reason I'm not expecting Rock/Cena 2 is that I'm expecting Rock/Brock. While Heyman's been good in his role, its not as if Punk really needed a mouthpiece, so I see them using Heyman in that role to link Punk to Lesnar and have Lesnar interfere at the Rumble.

As for the other two main events, again there's been nothing to point to them. Punk/Taker is something that's been pulled completely out of thin air, with absolutely no hint towards it, the same with a HHH/Lesnar rematch, not to mention that this card would do a worse buyrate than last year.

tbh this whole "Rock/Cena 2 is definitely happening" attitude that so many people have reminds me of last years mania when everyone said Cena was going over 100%, or MITB 2011, where Punk was definitely leaving and Cena was definitely going over. But in those two cases the decisions Vince made were the options that were best for business, just like he will for this Mania by using Rock/Brock. There's no way he has Brock on a one year contract and has 3 matches, against HHH and Cena, its just not good business.
__________________
jm99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2013, 08:34 PM   #13 (permalink)
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
The Dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Neptune
Posts: 645
The Dude 251 - 500The Dude 251 - 500The Dude 251 - 500The Dude 251 - 500
Default Re: Reasons why ROCK/CENA II and HHH/LESNAR II may not happen at WM29

IMO i think it will be

Brock/HHH 2
Punk/Taker
Cena/Rock 2

these of course are diffrent from what I wanna see
Brock/HHH (I guess)
Cena/Taker
Punk/Rock 2 (have someone want revenge its already got a ton of pop built up)
__________________

Do I Look Like A Reasonable Man To You Boy? Or Do I Look Like A Peppermint Nightmare?!?!?! - The Hitcher

[]Not Removing Until Adrian Neville/PAC wins a Title In WWE

Last edited by The Dude : 01-17-2013 at 08:37 PM.
The Dude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2013, 10:22 PM   #14 (permalink)
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 662
joeycalz 501 - 1000joeycalz 501 - 1000joeycalz 501 - 1000joeycalz 501 - 1000joeycalz 501 - 1000joeycalz 501 - 1000joeycalz 501 - 1000
Default Re: Reasons why ROCK/CENA II and HHH/LESNAR II may not happen at WM29

Am I the only one who thinks if Brock/HHH 2 happened, Brock would go over again? There is no point in Triple H winning and I think everybody knows it.
__________________

Mark For Now: CM Punk, Daniel Bryan, Dolph Ziggler, Ryback, The Shield, Wade Barrett, Cody Rhodes, Damien Sandow, Christian
Favorite Wrestlers All Time: The Rock (1A), Shawn Michaels (1B), The Undertaker, Chris Jericho, "Stone Cold" Steve Austin, "Macho Man" Randy Savage, Ric Flair, Sting, Mick Foley, Mr. Perfect, Bret Hart, Owen Hart, "Rowdy" Roddy Piper, Edge, Team Extreme, Trish Stratus
joeycalz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2013, 01:12 AM   #15 (permalink)
Acknowledged by SCOTT STEINER
 
JAROTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,462
JAROTO 501 - 1000JAROTO 501 - 1000JAROTO 501 - 1000JAROTO 501 - 1000JAROTO 501 - 1000JAROTO 501 - 1000
Default Re: Reasons why ROCK/CENA II and HHH/LESNAR II may not happen at WM29

Quote:
Originally Posted by joeycalz View Post
Am I the only one who thinks if Brock/HHH 2 happened, Brock would go over again? There is no point in Triple H winning and I think everybody knows it.
The match itself is so pointless. There's no reason to have this match again. HHH doesn't need to win neither Brock. Nobody cares about it.
JAROTO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2013, 05:04 AM   #16 (permalink)
Acknowledged by SCOTT STEINER
 
fulcizombie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 1,140
fulcizombie 101 - 250fulcizombie 101 - 250fulcizombie 101 - 250
Default Re: Reasons why ROCK/CENA II and HHH/LESNAR II may not happen at WM29

A wrestlemania with both rock/cena 2 and Lesnar/HHH 2 sounds awful and I will be extremely disappointed if it happens since this is probably the only WM that I will attend in my whole life .
fulcizombie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2013, 05:30 AM   #17 (permalink)
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: England
Posts: 820
purple_gloves 251 - 500purple_gloves 251 - 500purple_gloves 251 - 500
Default Re: Reasons why ROCK/CENA II and HHH/LESNAR II may not happen at WM29

If they go with the rematches, then I really can't see them even reaching a million buys, never mind matching last year. Taker/Cena is the only way they're matching last year.
__________________
Cena is crap.

purple_gloves is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2013, 06:49 AM   #18 (permalink)
Yelled at by SCOTT STEINER
 
ashes11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Watching streak matches on YouTube
Posts: 1,957
ashes11 1001 - 1500ashes11 1001 - 1500ashes11 1001 - 1500ashes11 1001 - 1500ashes11 1001 - 1500ashes11 1001 - 1500ashes11 1001 - 1500ashes11 1001 - 1500
Default Re: Reasons why ROCK/CENA II and HHH/LESNAR II may not happen at WM29

Remember when HHH was alone in the ring at Summerslam? The smarks shit all over him, he must be aware if he beats Brock the NY crowds will do the same. I don't mind that match if Brock resigns and wins.
__________________



Legend
ashes11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2013, 07:21 AM   #19 (permalink)
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 995
cyrus_cesar 101 - 250cyrus_cesar 101 - 250
Default Re: Reasons why ROCK/CENA II and HHH/LESNAR II may not happen at WM29

We can only guess as to what matches will take place, but after seeing HHH and Lesnar, you can't tell me that they weren't building off that match unless that's the story they wanted to tell. The match wasn't terrible, but it certain wasn't good enough to pay for another sample. It was literally a NO DQ match, and I kept waiting for the pain. It never showed. That's the only reason I can even think of them doing it again; to complete the story with a Triple H win in a hard fought battle.

As far as Rock and Cena? I'll put it like this...Suppose Rock goes over and beats Punk. Besides Lesnar (who might be leaving after WM), what is the biggest match that could be made? The options become limited if your trying to get people to you know..BUY THE SHOW! I'm sure a lot of people would love to see Rock vs Sheamus, or Orton, but if it isn't Taker or Lesnar, it's just a waste of money. Like him or not, People pay to see Cena, and those who rooted for Cena last yr, will cheer even harder to see him beat the one guy he has never beaten. Do I want to see it? FUCK NO, but it's highly possible. There's no denying that.
cyrus_cesar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2013, 07:46 AM   #20 (permalink)
3.31.13
 
Tyrion Lannister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: King's Landing
Posts: 63,925
Tyrion Lannister is a rep whoreTyrion Lannister is a rep whoreTyrion Lannister is a rep whoreTyrion Lannister is a rep whoreTyrion Lannister is a rep whoreTyrion Lannister is a rep whoreTyrion Lannister is a rep whoreTyrion Lannister is a rep whoreTyrion Lannister is a rep whoreTyrion Lannister is a rep whoreTyrion Lannister is a rep whore
Default Re: Reasons why ROCK/CENA II and HHH/LESNAR II may not happen at WM29

Come up with a billions reasons, these boring rematches ARE happening. Nothing's gonna stop them at this rate.
__________________

Game of Thrones has been renewed for season 4. A man is pleased.

"As the future of the land hangs in the balance, no one will rest until the Seven Kingdoms have exploded in a veritable storm of swords...."
Tyrion Lannister is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums
Copyright (C) Verticalscope Inc Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
Powered by vBulletin Copyright © 2000-2009 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007, PixelFX Studios