That's irrelevant

Yup. That match is too big not to be the main event.

__________________
Word life: This is Basic ThuganomicsSmackdown in 2003: The best year for the blue brand

TripleG

Cena Vs. Undertaker is probably the one Mania match I'd like to see both guys have (well except Taker Vs. Sting, but that ain't going to happen).

Why is it interesting? Because if ANYBODY is going to end the streak, it is going to be Cena. It would make my eyes roll if he did, but at least I would be going into it thinking "Wow, Taker might actually lose this one"

__________________
TRIPLE H, EXTREME RULES 2013, & MONDAY NIGHT RAW

Trucoltsfan

I couldnt agree more, At this pt, no one poses a "real" threat to the streak besides Cena. At this pt, if they dont have Cena/taker this yr, I think it leaves Taker wrestling in a match with an obvious outcome. It would be a huge "rub" for whomever, if ever, ends his streak. Cena is the only guy that deserves, that can take that "rub" and build upon it. No one else is deserving. Rock or Brock arent worthy of it just cause neither one of them is going to be around to carry the company. Cena makes perfect sense. And it appeals to every wrestling fan because we truly dont know what would happen. CM Punk is of no threat to the streak. How many matches/yrs does taker have left? I think this yr, he can still bring "it" and Cena is obviously in his prime. This yr is the time to do it!! Just my opinion.

Id love to see Sting/taker but Sting isnt smart enough to realize he deserves his 'Mania moment but he isnt going to get it at this pt.

__________________
Wrestlemania 30 will be my 9th in a row!!

TJTheGr81

Exactly how I feel about it. It would be a good big time match, but its not must see for me. Plus the possibility of Cena winning is too scary.

He won't be, so why even bother barking up that tree?

__________________


It's About Damn Time.