 |
|
12-20-2012, 04:04 PM
|
#51 (permalink)
|
|
Learning to break kayfabe
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 150
|
Re: One Person WWE Is Considering On Winning The Royal Rumble
Cena's winning the Rumble, I cannot see anything other than him winning it. Rock against Cena at Wrestlemania for the WWE Title is the only way they can eclipse last year's match.
Punk/Taker. Lesnar/HHH II. Rock/Cena II for WWE. Orton/Sheamus/Ziggler for WHC.
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
12-20-2012, 04:13 PM
|
#52 (permalink)
|
|
Working on my abs
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Boston, MA.
Posts: 2,709
|
Re: One Person WWE Is Considering On Winning The Royal Rumble
|
|
|
12-20-2012, 04:13 PM
|
#53 (permalink)
|
|
Little Poppa Pump
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,421
|
Re: One Person WWE Is Considering On Winning The Royal Rumble
I don't know who wants Lesnar/HHH 2 besides Triple H himself. Lesnar will have no reason to accept a rematch, and Triple H lost to him fair and square. Not to mention Lesnar broke his arm TWICE. Why would you have Lesnar come back to lose 2 matches?
If it's anything besides Undertaker vs. Lesnar at Wrestlemania, it'll be a bust in my opinion. Lesnar/Taker have such a great backstory, they have a history with one another. Taker never beat Lesnar, so that adds intrigue to it and begs the question, "can Taker actually beat Lesnar." Than you add that Lesnar is a legit MMA fighter, so that make it even more possible that this could be Taker's end of the Streak. I think about of fans (the marks at least) will be scared that Lesnar is going to pummel Taker to a pulp.
I don't want Sheamus vs. Orton. One, it doesn't interest me. Two, I don't agree with Sheamus winning the Rumble again. I really want them to have Ryback win the Royal Rumble than face Big Show for the WWE Championship. If Sheamus does win the Rumble, than what are you going to do with Ryback?
Rock/Cena II seems like a lock. I don't give a crap what Punk does this year, he could face Miz for all I care. He's not the star he think's he is, I'm sorry. I think Triple H should just take the year off.
__________________
Quote:
|
Unnecessary flips and choreographed spots does not equal good wrestling. Just because you can work a 25 minute match in front of 1,500 people does not means your a good wrestler.
|
Quote:
|
TNA's current product is like someone trying to sell a type-writer in 2013.
|
Quote:
|
Dear TNA and their fans: The 90's are over and their never coming back. Move on.
|
|
|
|
12-20-2012, 04:42 PM
|
#54 (permalink)
|
|
_
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 6,225
|
Re: One Person WWE Is Considering On Winning The Royal Rumble
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buckley
|
As much as I'd love for it to happen, and believe me I don't think there's anyone as bigger Ziggler fan as me (my favorite wrestler in the company for three years now). It's not happening. So I'd rather not even attempt to get my hopes up.
Quote:
Originally Posted by itssoeasy23
I don't want Sheamus vs. Orton. One, it doesn't interest me. Two, I don't agree with Sheamus winning the Rumble again. I really want them to have Ryback win the Royal Rumble than face Big Show for the WWE Championship. If Sheamus does win the Rumble, than what are you going to do with Ryback?
|
Agreed. Doesn't interest me either. And as I said in a previous post, if they really wanted to do Sheamus/Orton then make the match a personal feud with a heel Orton that doesn't need the title. They have a star in the making with Ryback in their hands and they should capitalize on that, instead of giving the Rumble win to a guy who doesn't need it and won't get any rub from it.
__________________

|
|
|
12-20-2012, 04:45 PM
|
#55 (permalink)
|
|
Little Poppa Pump
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,421
|
Re: One Person WWE Is Considering On Winning The Royal Rumble
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buckley
|
He's already got the MITB.
__________________
Quote:
|
Unnecessary flips and choreographed spots does not equal good wrestling. Just because you can work a 25 minute match in front of 1,500 people does not means your a good wrestler.
|
Quote:
|
TNA's current product is like someone trying to sell a type-writer in 2013.
|
Quote:
|
Dear TNA and their fans: The 90's are over and their never coming back. Move on.
|
|
|
|
12-20-2012, 04:57 PM
|
#56 (permalink)
|
|
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 788
|
Re: One Person WWE Is Considering On Winning The Royal Rumble
Ryback to win rumble, faces Show at Mania, wins but gets pummeled by Show during the celebration, "I'm here to show the world", Ziggler cashes in, takes the title setting up Ryback vs Ziggler w/AJ and Ryblack. My guess. It's just a guess though I have no clue.
I haven't followed wrestling background/dirtsheet info in like forever, how often are they right? As often as is statistically likely or more often than not?
|
|
|
12-20-2012, 05:26 PM
|
#57 (permalink)
|
|
Celebrating my first World title
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Bronx, NY
Posts: 13,660
|
Re: One Person WWE Is Considering On Winning The Royal Rumble
Quote:
Originally Posted by itssoeasy23
If it's anything besides Undertaker vs. Lesnar at Wrestlemania, it'll be a bust in my opinion. Lesnar/Taker have such a great backstory, they have a history with one another. Taker never beat Lesnar, so that adds intrigue to it and begs the question, "can Taker actually beat Lesnar." Than you add that Lesnar is a legit MMA fighter, so that make it even more possible that this could be Taker's end of the Streak. I think about of fans (the marks at least) will be scared that Lesnar is going to pummel Taker to a pulp.
|
Exactly. A Hell in a Cell between Lesnar and Taker would have a real fight feel to it and like mentioned Taker has never beaten Lesnar.
|
|
|
12-20-2012, 06:41 PM
|
#58 (permalink)
|
|
Asking SCOTT STEINER for Wrestling Advice
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 369
|
Re: One Person WWE Is Considering On Winning The Royal Rumble
Big daddy V is going to return and win it.
Just because shellshocking him would be a super-boner
|
|
|
12-20-2012, 07:15 PM
|
#59 (permalink)
|
|
Boy, I Gotta Watch My Back, Cause I'm Not Just Anybody
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Breaux Bridge, Louisiana
Posts: 3,330
|
Re: One Person WWE Is Considering On Winning The Royal Rumble
Yea, I don't buy this for one minute. They'd be idiots not to have Ryback win it. In fact, I think that other than Ryback winning the Rumble,Cena is the only other guy who has a chance to win. Sheamus vs Orton doesn't need to be for the title at all. They can have Orton cost Sheamus a match with Big Show or eliminate him from the Rumble in a heel manner. What will they do with Ryback if he doesn't win it.
__________________
All Time Faves: The Rock(1), Chris Benoit(2), Steve Austin(3),Kurt Angle(4),Chris Jericho(5),HBK(6) Edge(7), Taker(8), Eddie Guerrero(9), Kane(10)
|
|
|
12-20-2012, 07:34 PM
|
#60 (permalink)
|
|
Acknowledged by SCOTT STEINER
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: England
Posts: 1,252
|
Re: One Person WWE Is Considering On Winning The Royal Rumble
That would be terrible. And if it is Orton/Sheamus for the WHC, where does that leave Dolph?
__________________
Current favorite wrestlers: CM Punk, Daniel Bryan, Dolph Ziggler, Mark Henry, Roman Reigns
All-time favorite wrestlers: Stone Cold, The Rock, Kurt Angle, Triple H, HBK, The Undertaker, Brock Lesnar, Y2J, Eddie Guerrero, Edge
|
|
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|