SAMOA

Brock Lesnar v Shawn Michaels at this year's Wrestlemania??

Although I'd say its 95% likely were getting Brock/HHH the rematch which I think I can safely say nobody wants, alot of people seem to be forgetting that Brock "broke" Shawn's arm and not alot has been said about it since? With the 20th RAW Aniversary being in Texas,It would be the perfect way to re-start the Shawn/Brock feud? Maybe even some form of tag match HHH/HBK V Lesnar/Punk w/Heyman (Freeing up a Cena/Taker, and Rock v Young up-coming Superstar?) Perhaps I'm dreaming a little but this years WrestleMania has the potential to be huge, and as usual WWE Creative are just going to screw up.

MasterChan

Yo there!

What's your opinion on having a HHH/Lesnar Rematch at Wrestlemania? As it seems this is what the WWE Creatives are coming with this year. I was already bored with the first matchup they had. Cena/Lesnar was way better.

Me personally i dont wanna see that. There would be much more interesting Matchups (like Taker/Lesnar, CM Punk/Lesnar, Rock/Lesnar, Ryback/Lesnar..hell, i'd even prefer Daniel Bryan/Lesnar over HH/Lesnar).

So do you want another Lesnar/HHH at WM29?

dxbender

So because 1 dirtsheet reports this, suddenly everyone believes it?

Look at all the "rumored Wrestlemania cards" in the past few years. How many of those matches ever did happen.....

__________________


Other Faves:The Rock,Edge,Jericho,Kaitlyn,McIntyre,Usos
WWE isn't in PG ERA, It's in REBUILDING ERA

MasterChan

Just please no HHH/Lesnar-Rematch. That would be a wasted opportunity to use Lesnar again.

JAROTO

Please NO! That rumor is turning me off.

TripleG

I do believe this match is possible, but I hope they don't do it.

What would the point be? To give Triple H his win back? What purpose would that serve? Why can't Lesnar just take the heat he's gotten from breaking Triple H's arm and potentially ending his career and use it to set him up for a new star to take down? If Triple H just beats Brock, it just undoes the Summerslam match and that is it.

Triple H is still a legend and is as big a star as he is ever going to be. So why not use Brock to try and build up somebody new instead?

I always use this comparison, but is it better to have Obi-Wan get his revenge on Darth Vader, or is it better to use Obi-Wan's loss to build heat on Vader and give Luke purpose to face him?

__________________
TRIPLE H, EXTREME RULES 2013, & MONDAY NIGHT RAW

BillyKidman

If WWE wants to do Punk vs. Taker as Streak vs. Streak (so for the WWE-title), they need to get Taker to drop the title in a way that people will accept. What if there's a MitB-match (since for the first time someone failed to cash it in) at WM? You could have Taker winning at WM. The Shield (with or without Punk) could interrupt a promo of Taker (his celebration perhaps) on a RAW after WM (the day after, or a few weeks after). They could beat him down to a point where he can't get up anymore, and than the winner of the MitB could come out and defeat Taker. Punk could be angry at Taker for breaking his streak and/or not giving him the respect he deserves; The Shield could say that Taker didn't respect the WWE-champion by challenging him, and that's an injustice (or you could just have Ambrose winning the MitB-match). That would give Punk/The Shield and the MitB-winner major heat in the process. And the Undertaker could say he doesn't need a rematch because it wasn't about the WWE-title, but it was about his streak being the only streak people talk about (because he is personified by the streak, and if people forget the streak people forget him).

We have a streak vs. streak match, Taker's streak remains intact, Taker drops the title shortly after WM in a way people could accept, a new star gets a big rub and major heat by defeating a beaten down Taker.

Punk(c) vs. Undertaker
Cena vs. Rock II
Lesnar vs. HHH II (with HBK somewhat involved)
Ryback vs. Big Show(c)
Rey vs. Sin Cara
Money in the Bank
(if you ignore the fact two matches already happened, that's an awesome card; and it's a card I could really see happening)

__________________
IT'S ABOUT DAMN TIME

I'VE BEEN TOO DAMN GOOD FOR TOO DAMN LONG

Cliffy Byro

Big Dave isn't a dirtsheet.

cyrus_cesar

Let's be honest...after seeing that match play out the way it did, the only reason it could have been so lackluster and anticlimactic is because they plan on continuing with the story. That's the only reason I could see a rematch happening, otherwise no. I have no interest in seeing Triple H beat Lesnar just for the purpose of having something to do in another shitty match. It would be a waste, but then again WWE does have a habit of turning gold into shit pretty quickly.

the modern myth

No, I'm not interested in Lesnar/Triple H again. Their last match wasn't good and I would be far more interested in seeing Lesnar face either the Rock or the Undertaker.

__________________
Too many freaks, not enough circuses.