Wrestlemania 30: Austin Vs. Punk or Cena Vs. Undertaker? - Page 4 - Wrestling Forum : WWE, TNA, Debate League, Wrestling Videos, Women of Wrestling Forums
Reply

Old 12-10-2012, 01:51 PM   #31 (permalink)
Getting over in the mid-card
 
Kabraxal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 6,594
Kabraxal better hope they're relatively new hereKabraxal better hope they're relatively new hereKabraxal better hope they're relatively new hereKabraxal better hope they're relatively new hereKabraxal better hope they're relatively new hereKabraxal better hope they're relatively new hereKabraxal better hope they're relatively new hereKabraxal better hope they're relatively new hereKabraxal better hope they're relatively new hereKabraxal better hope they're relatively new hereKabraxal better hope they're relatively new here
Default Re: Wrestlemania 30: Austin Vs. Punk or Cena Vs. Undertaker?

Taker/Cena would accomplish nothing... either you have Taker go over again or you end the streak for someone that doesn't need it. But this is the WWE so that's probably what's going to happen. Just can't escape the stupid with this company right now.
__________________
Thanks for the wonderful memories Ultimate Warrior... happy you got to be recognised as the legend you are before you went. Rest in peace
Kabraxal is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 12-10-2012, 02:23 PM   #32 (permalink)
Wheel Man for SCOTT STEINER
 
The Pied Piper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,116
The Pied Piper The Pied Piper The Pied Piper The Pied Piper The Pied Piper The Pied Piper The Pied Piper The Pied Piper
Default Re: Wrestlemania 30: Austin Vs. Punk or Cena Vs. Undertaker?

Quote:
Originally Posted by austin316 G.O.A.T View Post
There is so much difference between Taker of 2003 and Taker 2012.Back then,Cena was a rookie.Now,he is one of the biggest superstars of all time.I personally prefer to see Cena vs Taker over Cena vs Rock.
But in literal sense, it can no longer be called a dream match due to it happening before.

And I think everybody (except Vince) prefers Taker/Cena over Cena/Rock.
The Pied Piper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2012, 01:23 AM   #33 (permalink)
Asking SCOTT STEINER for Wrestling Advice
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 438
screw you mcmahon screw you mcmahon
Default Re: Wrestlemania 30: Austin Vs. Punk or Cena Vs. Undertaker?

Hey guys I don't know if you heard, but Vince wants to do Punk vs. Undertaker at WM 29 and then follow it up by doing a rematch of Punk vs. Undertaker at WM 30. But on to the topic of the question. Under normal circumstances I would say Cena vs. Undertaker is a bigger drawing match than Punk vs. Austin if we operated under the assumption that Austin was not coming out of retirement. But I think Austin coming out of retirement in a match against Punk would be considered a big deal by fans and the major reason people would buy wrestlemania not Undertaker vs. Cena unless it was Undertaker's last match then there could be some debate there.
screw you mcmahon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2012, 11:01 AM   #34 (permalink)
Wheel Man for SCOTT STEINER
 
The Pied Piper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,116
The Pied Piper The Pied Piper The Pied Piper The Pied Piper The Pied Piper The Pied Piper The Pied Piper The Pied Piper
Default Re: Wrestlemania 30: Austin Vs. Punk or Cena Vs. Undertaker?

Quote:
Originally Posted by screw you mcmahon View Post
Hey guys I don't know if you heard, but Vince wants to do Punk vs. Undertaker at WM 29 and then follow it up by doing a rematch of Punk vs. Undertaker at WM 30. But on to the topic of the question. Under normal circumstances I would say Cena vs. Undertaker is a bigger drawing match than Punk vs. Austin if we operated under the assumption that Austin was not coming out of retirement. But I think Austin coming out of retirement in a match against Punk would be considered a big deal by fans and the major reason people would buy wrestlemania not Undertaker vs. Cena unless it was Undertaker's last match then there could be some debate there.
Source?

And about Taker/Cena & Austin/Punk....well, of course Vince can book Austin/Punk as main event, but if Cena/Taker goes before Austin/Punk then, at best, Austin/Punk will receive a similar crowd reaction to Orton/HHH at WM 25.
The Pied Piper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2012, 12:57 PM   #35 (permalink)
Getting over in the mid-card
 
Stone Hot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 6,902
Stone Hot needs to take rep more seriousStone Hot needs to take rep more seriousStone Hot needs to take rep more seriousStone Hot needs to take rep more seriousStone Hot needs to take rep more seriousStone Hot needs to take rep more serious
Default Re: Wrestlemania 30: Austin Vs. Punk or Cena Vs. Undertaker?

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Pied Piper View Post
Source?

And about Taker/Cena & Austin/Punk....well, of course Vince can book Austin/Punk as main event, but if Cena/Taker goes before Austin/Punk then, at best, Austin/Punk will receive a similar crowd reaction to Orton/HHH at WM 25.
no not all. they can put cena and taker in the middle of the card just like hhh vs taker at 28 and then have diva matches hof ceremony,world title matches after that to really rest up then have Punk vs Austin with a crowd just like they had with cena vs rock only 10 times better
__________________
Proud mark and supporter of Triple H. All of his wins are well deserved and he has earned his spot. Theres nothing you guys can do about it. Haters can suck it.

My 10 Favorite Wrestlers of all Time
1. Stone Cold Steve Austin
2. Shawn Michaels
3. Chris Jericho
4. Triple H
5. Edge
6. Undertaker
7. The Rock
8. Bret Hart
9. Kurt Angle
10. Mick Foley
Stone Hot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2012, 01:11 PM   #36 (permalink)
Acknowledged by SCOTT STEINER
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,067
BRITLAND should be embarassed if they have more than 50 postsBRITLAND should be embarassed if they have more than 50 postsBRITLAND should be embarassed if they have more than 50 postsBRITLAND should be embarassed if they have more than 50 postsBRITLAND should be embarassed if they have more than 50 posts
Default Re: Wrestlemania 30: Austin Vs. Punk or Cena Vs. Undertaker?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stone Hot View Post
no not all. they can put cena and taker in the middle of the card just like hhh vs taker at 28 and then have diva matches hof ceremony,world title matches after that to really rest up then have Punk vs Austin with a crowd just like they had with cena vs rock only 10 times better
nah replace Punk/Austin with Cena/Taker so they main event
BRITLAND is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2012, 01:58 PM   #37 (permalink)
Getting over in the mid-card
 
Kabraxal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 6,594
Kabraxal better hope they're relatively new hereKabraxal better hope they're relatively new hereKabraxal better hope they're relatively new hereKabraxal better hope they're relatively new hereKabraxal better hope they're relatively new hereKabraxal better hope they're relatively new hereKabraxal better hope they're relatively new hereKabraxal better hope they're relatively new hereKabraxal better hope they're relatively new hereKabraxal better hope they're relatively new hereKabraxal better hope they're relatively new here
Default Re: Wrestlemania 30: Austin Vs. Punk or Cena Vs. Undertaker?

Quote:
Originally Posted by BRITLAND View Post
nah replace Punk/Austin with Cena/Taker so they main event
Punk/Austin would actually be bigger and probalby drain the crowd more. And really, I don't think you want to end a WM with last thing you see is Cena standing tall and hearing Cole and Lawler shit themselves with "Cena has done it! He's ended the streak! He has got to be thre greatest wrestler that will ever live!". Of course... WM might not be able to continue if it was in the middle of the show because of the riot...
__________________
Thanks for the wonderful memories Ultimate Warrior... happy you got to be recognised as the legend you are before you went. Rest in peace
Kabraxal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2012, 02:02 PM   #38 (permalink)
Know Your Worth
 
Alim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 10,725
Alim is a rep whoreAlim is a rep whoreAlim is a rep whoreAlim is a rep whoreAlim is a rep whoreAlim is a rep whoreAlim is a rep whoreAlim is a rep whoreAlim is a rep whoreAlim is a rep whoreAlim is a rep whore
Default Re: Wrestlemania 30: Austin Vs. Punk or Cena Vs. Undertaker?

This is not the year 1999. Stone Cold is not a bigger draw than The Undertaker, especially at Wrestlemania.
__________________
THERE IS ONLY ONE DIAMOND IN THE BUSINESS AND HIS NAME IS TITUS O'NEIL

Alim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2012, 02:20 PM   #39 (permalink)
Getting over in the mid-card
 
Kabraxal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 6,594
Kabraxal better hope they're relatively new hereKabraxal better hope they're relatively new hereKabraxal better hope they're relatively new hereKabraxal better hope they're relatively new hereKabraxal better hope they're relatively new hereKabraxal better hope they're relatively new hereKabraxal better hope they're relatively new hereKabraxal better hope they're relatively new hereKabraxal better hope they're relatively new hereKabraxal better hope they're relatively new hereKabraxal better hope they're relatively new here
Default Re: Wrestlemania 30: Austin Vs. Punk or Cena Vs. Undertaker?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alim View Post
This is not the year 1999. Stone Cold is not a bigger draw than The Undertaker, especially at Wrestlemania.
His first match back would be pretty big. But I'm not just basing it on that, but the fact that you people are highly overrating the appeal of Cena v Taker. It doesn't sound like a match that could even be all that good, even not taking into the account the riot inducing ending sure to happen. There is at least an aura of possibility around Punk/Austin.

But in all fairness, at this point I wouldn't mind a Punk/Taker. Or maybe by WM30 someone like Ziggler or Bryan will be a big enough name to make a believable opponent. But for Cena... that ship has passed. He doesn't need the win and to break the streak. And on the unlikely chance he loses, most likely we'd have gotten a pretty mediocre match that accomplished nothing. Cena/Taker is pretty much as lose/lose as a match can get.
__________________
Thanks for the wonderful memories Ultimate Warrior... happy you got to be recognised as the legend you are before you went. Rest in peace
Kabraxal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2012, 02:34 PM   #40 (permalink)
Know Your Worth
 
Alim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 10,725
Alim is a rep whoreAlim is a rep whoreAlim is a rep whoreAlim is a rep whoreAlim is a rep whoreAlim is a rep whoreAlim is a rep whoreAlim is a rep whoreAlim is a rep whoreAlim is a rep whoreAlim is a rep whore
Default Re: Wrestlemania 30: Austin Vs. Punk or Cena Vs. Undertaker?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kabraxal View Post
His first match back would be pretty big. But I'm not just basing it on that, but the fact that you people are highly overrating the appeal of Cena v Taker. It doesn't sound like a match that could even be all that good, even not taking into the account the riot inducing ending sure to happen. There is at least an aura of possibility around Punk/Austin.

But in all fairness, at this point I wouldn't mind a Punk/Taker. Or maybe by WM30 someone like Ziggler or Bryan will be a big enough name to make a believable opponent. But for Cena... that ship has passed. He doesn't need the win and to break the streak. And on the unlikely chance he loses, most likely we'd have gotten a pretty mediocre match that accomplished nothing. Cena/Taker is pretty much as lose/lose as a match can get.
Shawn Michaels and HHH didn't need the win either... but they sure made it look believable that they were going to beat Taker. Cena can do the same. In fact, Cena can make it work even better.

He is undeniably the biggest star of this generation and defines an era. The match quality doesn't have to be great for a match to be good. Take Hogan/Rock for example. Wasn't a great wrestling match, but the crowd, the story being told in the ring, and the emotion being poured by the wrestlers made the match what it is. Cena/Taker can be structured similarly, but for that I think Cena would have to turn heel.
__________________
THERE IS ONLY ONE DIAMOND IN THE BUSINESS AND HIS NAME IS TITUS O'NEIL

Alim is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums
Copyright (C) Verticalscope Inc Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
Powered by vBulletin Copyright 2000-2009 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007, PixelFX Studios