Re: Wrestlemania 30: Austin Vs. Punk or Cena Vs. Undertaker?
All depends on if Punk/Taker happens this year... though even then, Punk/Austin by a longshot. The only great feuds Cena has been a part of are Edge and Punk. Whether it's the booking or just is ability, his feuds tend to fall completely flat.
But in reality... niether match should be for any belt and they need a long build to solidifying to newer stars with a huge feud: Bryan/Barret, Cesaro/Bryan, perhaps someone from the Shield having a year on fire leading to a Rumble win to face off a long standing champion. The only way you don't have this match have everything behind it is if you are going to put one of those younger stars up against Taker and actually end the streak and win the title. We need to stop this stupid part time attraction bullshit. It might spark buys for right now, but if you refuse to give your current stars a chance to reach the next level, you won't be able to have WM40 feature a part timer with enough star power to pull any buys.
Wrestling fan first... company fan last. Nothing worst than the fan that is loyal to the brand first and the wrestling second.
Ahhhh... late night strolls through the forum with my booze. Here's to finding out what the hell I did the next day!