Which Royal Rumbles do you consider the most entertaining? - Page 4 - Wrestling Forum : WWE, TNA, Debate League, Wrestling Videos, Women of Wrestling Forums
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #31 of 40 (permalink) Old 11-14-2012, 05:58 PM
Stand Up for the Boy in Green
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: dirty old town, dirty old town
Posts: 3,754
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
                     
Re: Which Royal Rumbles do you consider the most entertaining?

92 easily, I had to squint my eyes and watch that shit scrambled on sky movies (dont think sky sports existed yet) and it still ruled.

Hollywood Hanoi is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #32 of 40 (permalink) Old 11-14-2012, 05:59 PM
Learning to break kayfabe
 
DarkerDays's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 81
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
 
Re: Which Royal Rumbles do you consider the most entertaining?

2002. House clearance by Taker, with his shock elimination by Maven + reaction that lead to a one-sided brawl spilling into the crowd and beyond. Another reunion this time the Hardys & Lita. SCSA had his moment, stunners everywhere, even to burn time waiting for the next entrant. Awesome face-off between him and Triple H. Goldust of course returned. Mr. Perfect returned! Stone Cold's amusing elimination of Booker T. Kane and Big Show's clash of the titans, Kane impressive picking up 'Show and dumping him out of the ring. Obvious is was Triple H's rumble, but what a comeback. In short... that rumble had not a dull moment from start to finish.
DarkerDays is offline  
post #33 of 40 (permalink) Old 11-14-2012, 06:19 PM
Swaying to the Symphony Of Destruction
 
Snake Plissken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: England
Posts: 1,723
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
                     
Re: Which Royal Rumbles do you consider the most entertaining?

2001 : Kane going crazy eliminating 11 people, Hardcore Rumble, highly entertaining appearance by Honky Tonk Man, Big Show epic return, Austin, Kane and Rock ending was just awesome and the participants overall were just a great mix. 1999 was my second fave, Austin vs McMahon and the corporation was entertaining, McMahon would try anything to make sure Austin didn't win, Kane beating it up the asylum people, and yet again very entertaining, 1998 is my 3rd fave, Rock started becoming a true star at this point with the him and Austin finish, Mick Foley showing up as all 3 of his personas and I enjoyed the start with him and Chainsaw Charlie, awesome Rumble.
Snake Plissken is offline  
post #34 of 40 (permalink) Old 11-14-2012, 06:24 PM
Humbled
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 4,704
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: Which Royal Rumbles do you consider the most entertaining?

I am shocked almost nobody mentions 1999
There was a freakin movie in the Royal Rumble match with every second something new happening in the ring and backstage
DualShock is offline  
post #35 of 40 (permalink) Old 11-14-2012, 06:35 PM
THE CONQUEROR
 
RatedR10's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,268
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
                     
Re: Which Royal Rumbles do you consider the most entertaining?

2001 Rumble is my personal favourite. It's just a ton of fun to watch every single time.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dec_619 View Post
Can anyone remember Taka Michinoku being thrown out of the Rumble in 2000?
I watched that Rumble on VHS when I was about 6 or 7 years old and I still remember that.



"It's going to be great. I can't wait for the crowd, the noise, the energy in the building. I can't wait to take that all away from them."
- PK Subban
RatedR10 is offline  
post #36 of 40 (permalink) Old 11-15-2012, 09:13 AM
Learning to break kayfabe
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 25
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
 
Re: Which Royal Rumbles do you consider the most entertaining?

1.2001
2.2002
3.2000
grantus444 is offline  
post #37 of 40 (permalink) Old 11-15-2012, 09:30 AM
Challenging SCOTT STEINER's authority
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 4,562
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
                     
Re: Which Royal Rumbles do you consider the most entertaining?

When I think of the Rumble, I think of 3.

I had a videotape of 1992, and although I didn't appreciate it for what it was (Great commentary, great story, overall great match and fantastic roster,) I did really enjoy it. I think just the fact it was the first one I ever watched made me enjoy it no matter what, but as I've watched it since I really appreciate the things I mentioned in the brackets.

1998 was another one I had on video, and loved the Austin as the target man story. He had to win it too. I wasn't a fan of the Rumble being prior to the main event. I also remember and really enjoyed Foley entering as all 3 of his characters, Owen Hart falling down the steps was funny and Steve Blackman doing perhaps the greatest roundhouse kick I've ever seen.

I remember watching Royal Rumble 2000 live as the first one I had ever seen as it happened and not a few weeks/months later. Looking back, I'm amazed at how different 1998 and 2000 was in such a short time. 2000 to me seems like a completely different promotion. I loved the entire event and enjoyed the Rumble. Ridiculous as it was, the Too Cool and Rikishi moment was great, I will never forget Taka Michinoku's elimination and I was rooting for The Rock to win.
Issues_Sunshyne is offline  
post #38 of 40 (permalink) Old 11-15-2012, 10:16 AM
Winning World titles, Custom Made Clothes
 
RyanPelley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Belleville, Indiana
Posts: 15,060
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
                     
Re: Which Royal Rumbles do you consider the most entertaining?

Favorite: 1992. The most star studded Rumble ever, with the winner getting the WWF Championship. Hogan, Flair, Savage, Piper, and Sid remained at the end. Incredible.

Least favorites: 1998, 2000. 98 was just Steve Austin and 29 other jobbers / midcarders. Was so obvious that he was winning. 2000, in my opinion, was just a bad PPV all around. Triple H and Foley was amazing, but the rest, Rumble match included, bored me.


That has got to be Kane.
RyanPelley is offline  
post #39 of 40 (permalink) Old 11-15-2012, 10:33 AM
Working on my abs
 
legendmaker2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,792
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: Which Royal Rumbles do you consider the most entertaining?

1990-94 then 97-2005

legendmaker2 is offline  
post #40 of 40 (permalink) Old 11-15-2012, 11:46 AM
AND YOU SHINE MY SHOES IF I WANT YOU TO
 
xdoomsayerx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Best in the world: CHICAGO
Posts: 9,498
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
2001 by far

Top 10 all time favorites:

Stone Cold Steve Austin
The Undertaker
Shawn Michaels
Chris Jericho
Brock Lesnar
Kurt Angle
HHH
Edge
CM Punk
Kane (98-04)
xdoomsayerx is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome